33.8 C
Bangkok
Saturday, June 27, 2026
Home Blog Page 1450

House Panel Presses Toward Historic Trump Impeachment Vote

A file photo of US President Donald Trump. Image: Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Judiciary Committee pushed deliberately toward a historic vote Thursday night to approve articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, splitting sharply along party lines in a grueling session that stretched late into the evening. It was expected to end with charges being sent to the full House for action next week, before the holidays.

The committee, made up of some of the most strident Democrats and Republicans in Congress, clashed for hours in pointed and at times emotional debate, drawing on history and the Constitution to argue over the two charges. Trump is accused, in the first article, of abusing his presidential power by asking Ukraine to investigate his 2020 rival, Joe Biden, while holding military aid as leverage, and, in the second, of obstructing Congress by blocking the House’s efforts to probe his actions.

Trump is only the fourth U.S. president to face impeachment proceedings and the first to be running for reelection at the same time. He insists he did nothing wrong and blasts the Democrats’ effort daily as a sham and harmful to America. Republican allies seem unwavering in their opposition to expelling Trump, and he claims to be looking ahead to swift acquittal in a Senate trial.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi sounded confident Thursday that Democrats, who once tried to avoid a solely partisan effort, will have the votes to impeach the president without Republican support when the full House votes. But she said it was up to individual lawmakers to weigh the evidence.

“The fact is we take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi told reporters. “No one is above the law; the president will be held accountable for his abuse of power and for his obstruction of Congress.”

The outcome poses potentially serious political consequences for both parties ahead of the 2020 elections, with Americans deeply divided over whether the president indeed conducted impeachable acts and if it should be up to Congress, or the voters, to decide whether he should remain in office.

The president has refused to participate in the proceedings, tweeting criticisms as he did Thursday from the sidelines, mocking the charges against him in the House’s nine-page resolution as “impeachment light.” But Pelosi said the president was wrong and the case against him is deeply grounded.

Democrats contend that Trump has engaged in a pattern of misconduct toward Russia dating back to the 2016 election campaign that s pecial counsel Robert Mueller investigated. And they say his dealings with Ukraine have benefited its aggressive neighbor Russia, not the U.S., and he must be prevented from “corrupting” U.S. elections again and cheating his way to a second term next year.

“It is urgent,” Pelosi said.

The Judiciary Committee session drew out over two days, with both sides appealing to Americans’ sense of history — Democrats describing a sense of duty to stop what one called the president’s “constitutional crime spree” and Republicans decrying what one said was the “hot garbage’’ impeachment and what it means for the future of the country.

Trump, apparently watching the live proceedings on television, tweeted his disapproval

“Very sad,” Trump said.

As lawmakers dug in for the second day at the stately hearing room in the Capitol, Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., immediately asked for a full reading of the two articles of impeachment against the president as TV cameras carried the live proceedings . Then came a long day of fights over amendments, primarily by Republicans trying to stop the impeachment. They were being rejected by Democrats along party lines.

“The central issue of this impeachment is the corruption of our institutions that safeguard democracy by our president,” Nadler said. “We cannot tolerate a president subverting the fairness and integrity of our elections.”

The top Republican, Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, called the proceedings a “farce” and said they should be halted until his side was provided a chance for its own hearing. The request was denied, with the chairman saying the process was in line with the impeachment hearings of Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

First up was an amendment from GOP Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who tried to delete the first charge against Trump. “This amendment strikes article one because article one ignores the truth,” he declared.

Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., argued there was “overwhelming evidence” that the president with his lawyer Rudy Giuliani, in pushing Ukraine to investigate rival Biden, was engaged in an abuse of power “to corrupt American elections.″

Debate on that one amendment lasted for hours before it was defeated, 23-17, on a party-line vote.

Another amendment, from Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., sought to replace part of the article that says Trump “corruptly solicited” Ukraine to launch an investigation into Biden with his reference to Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the gas company in Ukraine where he served on the board. That, too, was rejected by the panel on party lines. Others followed.

Republicans say Democrats are impeaching the president because they can’t beat him in 2020. Democrats warn Americans can’t wait for the next election because they worry what Trump will try next.

“People who know right from wrong are listening,” said Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif. Gaetz shot back, “They’re right, they can’t wait.”

Thursday’s hearing picked up where Wednesday’s late-night session left off.

Into the night, Democrats and Republicans delivered sharp, poignant and, at times, personal arguments for and against impeachment. Cicilline asked Republicans standing with Trump to “wake up” and honor their oath of office. Republican Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana responded with his own request to “put your country over party.” Rep. Lou Correa, D-Calif., shared his views in English and Spanish.

One Democrat, Rep. Val Demings of Florida, told the panel that, as a descendant of slaves and now a member of Congress, she has faith in America because it is “government of the people” and in this country “nobody is above the law.” Freshman Democratic Rep. Lucy McBath of Georgia emotionally talked about losing her son to gun violence and said that while impeachment was not why she came to Washington, she wants to “fight for an America that my son Jordan would be proud of.”

But Jordan of Ohio insisted Democrats were impeaching because “they don’t like us” — referring to Trump voters in what he called “fly-over” states like his.

Said Nadler: “History will look back on our actions here today. How would you be remembered?”

One Republican, Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan, who is not on the panel, announced Thursday he would not support impeachment.

The House is expected to vote on the articles next week, in the days before Christmas. That would send them to the Senate for a 2020 trial.

___

Associated Press writers Laurie Kellman, Alan Fram, Padmananda Rama and David Eggert contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Court Rules Toilet Use Limit for Transgender Gov’t Official Illegal

Tokyo pride parade in 2017. Image: Kyodo
Tokyo pride parade in 2017. Image: Kyodo

TOKYO — A court ordered the government on Thursday to pay damages to a transgender official, ruling that it was illegal for her workplace to impose restrictions on her use of women’s toilets.

The Tokyo District Court ordered the state to pay the official, who was born male but has led a life as a female, a total of 1.32 million yen ($12,000).

It is the first court ruling in Japan in favor of a plaintiff suffering discrimination in a workplace on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity and seeking improved treatment, according to the lawyers of the plaintiff.

Continue reading the story here.

Advertisement

UK Edges Closer to Brexit as Tories Close in on Majority

Britain's Prime Minister and Conservative Party leader Boris Johnson holds his dog Dilyn as he leaves after voting in the general election at Methodist Central Hall, Westminster, London, Thursday, Dec. 12, 2019. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein)

LONDON (AP) — Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party is likely to win a solid majority of seats in Parliament, an exit poll suggested late Thursday — a decisive outcome to a Brexit-dominated election that should allow Johnson to fulfill his plan to take the U.K. out of the European Union next month.

It would also make Johnson the most electorally successful Conservative leader since Margaret Thatcher, another politician who was loved and loathed in almost equal measure.

The survey, released just after polls closed, predicted the Conservatives would get 368 of the 650 House of Commons seats and the Labour Party 191. In the last election in 2017, the Conservatives won 318 seats and Labour 262.

It would be the biggest Tory majority since Thatcher’s 1980s’ heyday, and Labour’s lowest number of seats since 1935.

That result would be a triumph for Johnson and a disaster for left-wing Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who faced immediate calls for his resignation.

Based on interviews with voters leaving 144 polling stations across the country, the poll is conducted for a consortium of U.K. broadcasters and is regarded as a reliable, though not exact, indicator of the likely result. The poll also projected 55 seats for the Scottish National Party and 13 for the Liberal Democrats.

Ballots were being counted, with official results expected early Friday. However, the first handful of returns showed a surge in support for the Conservatives in seats in northern England, where Labour has long been dominant. Significantly, the Conservatives won the northwest England town of Workington, which was held by Labour for almost all of the last century.

A decisive Conservative win would vindicate Johnson’s decision to press for Thursday’s early election, which was held nearly two years ahead of schedule. He said that if the Conservatives won a majority, he would get Parliament to ratify his Brexit divorce deal and take the U.K. out of the EU by the current Jan. 31 deadline.

The poll suggests that message had strong appeal for Brexit-supporting voters, who turned away from Labour in the party’s traditional heartlands and embraced Johnson’s promise that the Conservatives would “get Brexit done.”

“I think Brexit has dominated, it has dominated everything by the looks of it,” said Labour economy spokesman John McDonnell. “We thought other issues could cut through and there would be a wider debate, from this evidence there clearly wasn’t.”

Johnson did not mention the exit poll as he thanked voters in a tweet. “Thank you to everyone across our great country who voted, who volunteered, who stood as candidate,” he said. “We live in the greatest democracy in the world.”

1000 7
British opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, gestures after casting his vote in the general election, in Islington, London, England, Thursday, Dec. 12, 2019. (AP Photo/Thanassis Stavrakis)

Conservative Party chairman James Cleverly said he was cautious about the poll, but that if substantiated it would give the party “a big majority” that could be used to “get Brexit done.”

A decisive Conservative victory would also provide some relief to the EU, which has grown tired of Britain’s Brexit indecision.

“What we said for months was … we need a clarification. This clarification appears to have taken place,” said France’s European affairs minister, Amelie de Montchalin.

EU Council President Charles Michel promised that EU leaders meeting Friday would send a “strong message” to the next British government and parliament about next steps.

“We are ready to negotiate,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said.

The pound surged on the exit poll’s forecast, jumping over two cents against the dollar, to $1.3445, the highest in more than a year and a half. Many Investors hope a Conservative win would speed up the Brexit process and ease, at least in the short term, some of the uncertainty that has corroded business confidence since the 2016 vote.

Many voters casting ballots on Thursday hoped the election might finally find a way out of the Brexit stalemate in this deeply divided nation.

On a dank, gray day with outbreaks of blustery rain, voters went to polling stations in schools, community centers, pubs and town halls after a bad-tempered five-week campaign rife with mudslinging and misinformation.

Opinion polls had given the Conservatives a steady lead, but the result was considered hard to predict, because the issue of Brexit cuts across traditional party loyalties.

Three and a half years after the U.K. voted by 52%-48% to leave the EU, Britons remain split over whether to leave the 28-nation bloc, and lawmakers have proved incapable of agreeing on departure terms.

Johnson pushed for the early election — Britain’s first December vote since 1923 — to try to break the political logjam. He campaigned relentlessly on a promise to “Get Brexit done” by getting Parliament to ratify his “oven-ready” divorce deal with the EU and take Britain out of the bloc as scheduled on Jan. 31.

That would fulfill the decision of the 2016 referendum, and start a new phase of negotiations on future relations between Britain and the 27 remaining EU members.

1000 2 1
A man dressed as Father Christmas enters his grotto at the Dunster Tithe Barn near Minehead, Somerset, England which is being used as a polling station in the 2019 general election, Thursday Dec. 12, 2019. (Ben Birchall/PA via AP)

The Conservatives focused much of their energy on trying to win in a “red wall” of working-class towns in central and northern England that have elected Labour lawmakers for decades but also voted strongly in 2016 to leave the EU. That effort got a boost when the Brexit Party led by Nigel Farage decided at the last minute not to contest 317 Conservative-held seats to avoid splitting the pro-Brexit vote.

Labour, which is largely but ambiguously pro-EU, faced competition for anti-Brexit voters from the centrist Liberal Democrats, Scottish and Welsh nationalist parties, and the Greens.

On Brexit, the opposition party said it would negotiate a new divorce deal with the EU and then offer voters the choice of leaving the 28-nation bloc on those terms or remaining.

But on the whole Labour tried to focus the campaign away from Brexit and onto its radical domestic agenda, vowing to tax the rich, nationalize industries such as railroads and water companies and give everyone in the country free internet access. It campaigned heavily on the future of the National Health Service, a deeply respected institution that has struggled to meet rising demand after nine years of austerity under Conservative-led governments.

But if the exit poll is correct, it wasn’t enough to boost Labour’s fortunes. Defeat could spell the end for Corbyn, a veteran socialist who moved his party sharply to the left after taking the helm in 2015, but who now looks to have led his left-of-center party to two electoral defeats since 2017.

“It’s Corbyn,” said former Labour Cabinet minister Alan Johnson, when asked about the poor result. “We knew he was incapable of leading, we knew he was worse than useless at all the qualities you need to lead a political party.”

For many voters, the election offered an unpalatable choice. Both Johnson and Corbyn have personal approval ratings in negative territory, and both have been dogged by questions about their character.

Corbyn has been accused of allowing anti-Semitism to spread within the party. The 70-year-old left-winger was portrayed by opponents as an aging Marxist with unsavory past associations with Hamas and the IRA.

Johnson has been confronted with past broken promises, untruths and offensive statements, from calling the children of single mothers “ignorant, aggressive and illegitimate” to comparing Muslim women who wear face-covering veils to “letter boxes.”

Yet, his energy and determination proved persuasive to many voters.

“It’s a big relief, looking at the exit polls as they are now, we’ve finally got that majority a working majority that we have not had for 3 1/2 years,” said Conservative-supporting writer Jack Rydeheard. “We’ve got the opportunity to get Brexit done and get everything else that we promised as well. That’s investment in the NHS, schools, hospitals you name it — it’s finally a chance to break that deadlock in Parliament.”

___

Associated Press writers Gregory Katz, Sheila Norman-Culp and Jo Kearney in London contributed.

Advertisement

Mentally Ill Man Cleared of Lese Majeste, Gets 3 Years for Cybercrime

A file photo of the Criminal Court.
A file photo of the Criminal Court.

BANGKOK — A man diagnosed with mental illness on Thursday was convicted of violating the Computer Crime Act, though he avoided a more serious crime under royal defamation.

According to legal watchdog iLaw, the 30-year-old man whom they identified only as “Sichon” was found guilty by the Criminal Court of disseminating contents deemed to pose a threat to national security. He was sentenced to three years in prison.

iLaw described Sichon as a man diagnosed with an unspecified mental condition.
The defendant was granted bail by the court.

Police initially charged him with insulting the monarchy when they arrested him in 2018. He was accused of writing offensive comments two years earlier about the late King Bhumibol.

Defaming the monarchy, or lese majeste, is punishable by up to 15 years in jail. The prosecutor later dropped the charge, and only pursued a lesser offense of cybercrime against him.

Although Sichon’s father testified that his son is crippled by mental conditions, the court said evidence suggested that Sichon appeared to be sane when he committed the crime, iLaw said.

So-called insanity defense generally don’t hold up in court in cases that involve the monarchy. In 2014, a court found a woman guilty of lese majeste for stepping over a portrait of King Rama IX, despite her history of mental illness.

Advertisement

Residents ‘Hidden’ By Billboard for Royal Barges Speak Out

BANGKOK — Millions of viewers watching a live broadcast of today’s Royal Barge Procession would likely have missed the sight of a community of riverside houses close to the Grand Palace.

That’s because the cluster of these shanty houses is literally hidden from the river by a giant barrier and a billboard honoring His Majesty the King. Residents interviewed by a reporter said they aren’t sure who erected the barrier – the image of which raised many eyebrows on social media – or why.

“We cannot really express our views about the billboard. We are just small people,” resident and food vendor Duangjai Limpalekha, 51, said in an interview at her home.

138622075 15760260800781n 1

As a native who grows up right next to the Chao Phraya River, Duangjai said she had watched similar processions organized under the late King Bhumibol without any obstruction. But the metal barrier was suddenly built between the community and the river two months ago.

Her son, Teerawuth Panthasaeng, said he is also unsure about the purpose of the barricade, which stands at about 10 meters tall and stretches for 100 meters. But Duangjai said the sheds on the river are not beautiful and may affect the overall beauty of the royal barge scenery.

Seeing his mother feeling rather uncomfortable answering the questions from a reporter, her Teerawuth said a lot of space was left between the billboard and the houses.

“They don’t feel uncomfortable,” Teerawuth said of his neighbors, who are nowhere to be found for the day. “It’s just about beautification, and before it was done, people were asked about it.”

138269056 15644527710151n 1

He believes the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration might be responsible for the barricade.

Located close to Maha That Alley, the houses are part of a 80-household community that protrudes into the river. Portions of the land here are owned by different state agencies, such as the Crown Property Bureau, Silpakorn University, Marine Department, and the Interior Affairs Ministry.

Although the houses technically sit on public land, and therefore could be considered an act of encroachment by the authorities, Duangjai said she pays a yearly “rent” of 200 baht to the Marine Department.

2db1280e ddf4 11e9 94c8 f27aa1da2f45 image hires 210347 2

Negotiating a passage into the community requires considerable explanation to soldiers, both uniformed and plainclothed. The troops initially mistook a reporter as a Chinese tourist, and then made more inquiries to ensure that the reporter was no “terrorist.”

Some soldiers, dressed in uniforms of the king’s mass movement Chit Asa, were also seen sitting in the houses themselves, watching over the river. The reporter was told that those houses are “off limits” for the day.

Duangjai said the horde of soldiers means a good business for her; just today, the officers placed an order of 50 packs of either sticky rice and fried pork, or chicken with chili paste.

Related stories:

River Dwellers Abandon Homes For Concrete Promenade (Photos, Video)

Advertisement

More Tourists, Less Spending for 2019 New Year’s Eve Season

Foreign tourists relax on Pattaya Beach in a December 2014 file photo.
Foreign tourists relax on Pattaya Beach in a December 2014 file photo.

BANGKOK — More holidaymakers are headed to Thailand to bid farewell to 2019 than the same period last year, though they are expected to spend less per person, a senior tourism official said Thursday.

At least 546,000 tourists will arrive in Thailand for the New Year’s Eve season, according to the Tourism Authority of Thailand governor Yuthasak Supasorn, slightly up from 520,000 visitors in 2018. The government said it has several economic stimulus packages lined up to boost year-end spending among domestic tourists.

“We expect around 5 to 10 percent increase in the number of tourists visiting Thailand during this month’s high season,” Yuthasak said in an interview. “However, they are expected to spend less.”

He attributed the thrift to the surge of baht value. The currency rose by approximately 10 percent against the US Dollars in the past months, causing much pain to the export and tourism industries.

But the governor said tourists’ spending will likely improve, thanks to the New Year countdown festivals organized by the tourism authorities and their partners across the country.

“The country remains one of the world’s top destinations for countdown events,” Yuthasak said.

This year’s events will not only be held at major destinations like Bangkok, Chiang Mai, and Phuket as usual, but also include provinces like Korat, Udon Thani, and Chiang Rai as part of the government’s effort to spread tourism into less popular destinations, he said.

Although there are economic stimulus plans for domestic tourists like the “Travel Thailand with 100 Baht” scheme in which Thai citizens can snatch 100-baht deals for flights and hotel vouchers, Yuthasak said there’s no plans for similar schemes to be offered to foreign tourists.

“They are more interested in our natural wonders than prices,” he said.

On Wednesday, tourism minister Pipat Ratchakitprakan also said the surge of baht in recent months continues to hurt Thai tourism industry. He estimated that tourism will generate 3.04 trillion baht in revenue this year, slightly less than the target of 3.2 trillion baht.

Suthirawat Suwanawat, Suvarnabhumi Airport manager, said the airport expected fewer chartered flights than last year due to the ongoing maintenance works of the airport’s east runway, which cut the maximum number of flights per hour from 68 to 34 daily.

He said 200,000 foreign passengers will arrive at the capital each day from Dec. through next year’s Feb.

Advertisement

Filipino Mom-and-Kid “Mag-ina” Meme Spreads to Thainet

“Where are you going?” “To see the person I like.” “Why are you back?” “Because they already have a girlfriend.” Image: Pikul Moonthadee / Facebook
“Where are you going?” “To see the person I like.” “Why are you back?” “Because they already have a girlfriend.” Image: Pikul Moonthadee / Facebook

BANGKOK — The feeling of heading out somewhere important only to come back empty-handed and slightly embarrassed seems to be a common ASEAN sentiment – as proven by a Filipino meme gone viral on Thai internet.

The “Mag-ina”, or “Mae-loog” meme, which both mean “Mom and kid” in Filipino and Thai, involves cartoon where a mom asks where her child is going – only for the child to return in the next panel, disappointed in their aspirations. Thais have been using the meme over the past week to express similar disappointments in relationships, money, and politics.

The comic’s format was originally created by Native American cartoonist Ricardo Cate in his “Without Reservations” comic strip series, which showed a child coming back from school, replying to his mom who asked if he learned anything in school with “Yeah, but not enough. They want me to go back tomorrow!”

The comic was remixed in the Philippines as a meme, with different versions of the “Mag-ina” (“mother-child”) comic popping up. Artist Chino de Chavez created the 3D version that became widely used. On Nov. 15, the Phillippine Embassy in Iraq’s Facebook even used the meme to 15 to warn Filipinos seeking work there against illegal recruiters.

“My child, why did you come back? I thought you had scheduled to go overseas?” the mom says. The child replies, “I was talking to illegal recruiters. We should have checked with the POEA first,” referring to the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration.

Chavez himself posted on his Facebook that he was getting lots of Thai accounts adding him as a friend with a reshare of a Thai Mag-ina meme.

That’s enough meme-history: here are some Thai “Mae-loog” memes:

“Where are you going?”
“To travel and live my life according to my dreams.”
“Why are you back?”
“I don’t have money.”

“Where are you going?”
“To get my boyfriend back from the bar.”
“Why are you back?”
“It’s easier just to get a new guy.”

This Pantip page’s meme posted Tuesday has 20,000 likes and counting:

“Where are you going?”
“To hell.”
“Why are you back?”
“I forgot to bring the Prime Minister with me.”

One of them mocked MP Parina Kraikup, whose alleged encroachment on protected land may not result in imprisonment.

“Where are you going?”
“To visit E Ae [Parina] in jail.”
“Why are you back?”
“She didn’t get arrested.”

Sports fans also used the meme to express frustration with Wednesday’s United Champions League match.

“Where are you going?”
“To curse Liverpool to fail the UCL.”
“Why are you back?”
“They won 2-0 and are in the group stage.”

Advertisement

Entertainment, #Relatable Tweets Topped Thailand’s Twitter in 2019

A file photo of Lisa Blackpink.

BANGKOK — If you were an active Thai Twitter user in 2019, you already know who Bambam, Peck, and Lisa are, so this article is a non-news for you. 

For the Thai Twitterverse-uninitiated, Thais used Twitter in 2019 to talk about their favorite artists, both local and Korean. They also like to share beautiful photos of nature, discuss personal experiences, follow along with current events, and trade beauty tips, according to stats released by Twitter’s Thailand PR team, Infinity Communications on Tuesday. 

The most liked tweet of the entire year was by Kunpimook Bhuwakul, better known as BamBam of Got7 K-pop band, and showed a photo of his fans lighting up the Impact Muang Thong Thani stadium during the Kcon 2019 concert on Sept. 28. The tweet currently has more than 155,000 likes.

A photo of an April sunset, looking like three images Photoshopped together posted by @nnxnknxe was the top-retweeted tweet of the year, with more than 133,800 retweets.

The tweet that prompted the most discussion was by @TheSmilingHut and asked, “What was your most memorable culture shock upon moving overseas?”

Some of the replies included copious “thank yous” in the US, saying hello to the bus driver in New Zealand, movie theater intermissions in India, and Rwanda’s plastic bag ban. 

All top 10 most-used hashtags were about entertainment, with four of the top about Thai singers: Palitchoke “Peck” Ayanaputra, known as #PeckPalitchoke, BamBam , Lalisa Manoban or Lisa Blackpink, and BNK48.

Also making the list was #OffGun for the “Off Gun Fun Night” TV show, #SingtoPrachaya for the actor Prachaya Ruangroj, #KristPerawat for the actor Perawat Sangpotirat, and Cherprang Areekul of BNK48. 

Most Tweeted about hashtags h

Bambam, Peck, and Krist were Perawat were also the top three most tweeted-about entertainment accounts in Thailand.

The most tweeted-about accounts overall, however, were not stars: top three spots @Sfkkfs_, @Suzu17, and @Yoxrgravity tweeted wide-ranging tweets about K-pop, beauty, and news, as well as emotional sentiments, random musings, and even social commentary. 

Most Tweeted about entertainment accounts h

Twitter hashtag use also spiked during major events of the year, such as the #Coronation, #ThailandElection2019, #Songkran, and #ASEANSummit. Beauty and makeup lovers gathered around the #HowtoPerfect hashtag, while high schoolers posted about the convoluted system and costs of pre-university tests at #Dek62.

Most Tweeted about people h

Finally, the most-used emojis: 

Most Tweeted about emojis h

Related stories:

Thailand Cheers as ‘Lisa’ Blackpink Listed on Time 100 List

“Hello Test”: Prayuth Tests Twitter on Eve of PM Vote

Advertisement

School Bans Bangs to Prevent Girls From Copying ‘K Pop Hairstyle’

Students at Siyanusorn School on Dec. 11, 2019.
Students at Siyanusorn School on Dec. 11, 2019.

CHANTHABURI — Director of a school in the eastern region on Wednesday defended his decision to ban schoolgirls from wearing fringes, despite protests from students and education campaigners.

Although ministerial regulations allow female pupils to wear bangs, Sunreng Srisitthichaisakul, director of Siyanusorn School, said he took the step beyond government policies out of his concern that students may style their hair after K-pop stars.

“This rule has been enforced for many years already,” Sunreng said. “However, there’s a trend among teenage girls who want to style their hair after a popular K-pop star, so we passed out agreements to prevent students from violating school rules.”

The strict rule drew much attention on social media after student rights group Education for Liberation of Siam posted the school’s order banning bangs on its Facebook page. The group called it excessive and “unreasonable.”

In the document reportedly handed to students who broke the ban, they were required to confess to the wrongdoing and promise to fix their hairstyles. They were also required to accept any consequences “without any conditions” should they repeat the same offense.

Both the students and their parents were required to sign the agreement at school, the advocate group said. Failure to sign the paper after three summon letters would result in the students being expelled, according to the group.

Although it is not uncommon for teachers to enforce school dress codes and haircuts – often in a rough and summarily manner – Siyanusorn School’s threat of expulsion for a petty offense caused much discussion on social media.

“This is bullshit. They should spend time teaching the students rather than picking on them,” user Aoi Thompson commented on Facebook. “That’s why Thai students fall behind other nations. This is a violation of their rights”.

Another user pulled out the hairstyle regulation enacted by the Ministry of Education and noted that it doesn’t ban bangs.

“Read it, for those who believe the school is right,” Achita Yoriya wrote.

Under the official regulation, boys’ hair must be no longer than their hairline and girls’ must keep it no longer than the nape. Schools also have the leeway to allow longer hair, but it must be tied up properly.

However, many public schools choose to ignore the policy and enact their own rules, as in the case of Siyanusorn School.

Despite claims made by the campaigners, director Sunreng said his school would not go as far as expelling students for hair offense.

“There must have been some misunderstanding. We never expel students because of bangs,” the director said. “The penalty for this would be deduction of merit points.”

A number of netizens also sided with the school, saying that the practice can teach students to abide by law and order when they grow up.

“There are rules in every organization and these rules are based on the organization’s culture. If you want to be part of an organization, you should be ready to obey their rules,” Mon Plimkamon wrote. “This is Thai culture, so you should accept it. If everyone breaks the rules, how can we live peacefully?”

Siyanusorn School is attended by about 4,000 students from Matthayom 1 to Matthayom 6.

Related stories:

Students Appalled by Haphazard Forced Cut (Video)

Advertisement

Court Affirms Poaching Jail Term for Construction Tycoon

A file photo of Premchai Karnasuta

Update: Premchai Karnasuta was sent to prison for a night after failing to post bail.

KANCHANABURI — An appeal court on Thursday affirmed a guilty verdict on construction mogul Premchai Karnasuta accused of conspiring to poach wildlife animals in a protected forest in 2018.

The court also handed down a prison term of 16 months to Premchai, who was found guilty of the charge by the lower court in March. The court refused to suspend the jail term to Premchai.

The defendant later tried to post bail but failed to secure relevant documents by the time the court office closes down. Premchai was sent to prison for the night and told to try posting bail release again tomorrow.

Top: Prison officials escort Premchai to a prisoner’s van.

In its verdict, the court said there was evidence that Premchai brought firearms into the National Park without a permit and helped hunt wildlife there with his accomplices.

Premchai was also ordered to pay a damage of 2 million baht to the forest authorities.

However, the Italian-Thai Ltd. CEO was acquitted of killing a black panther in the wildlife sanctuary – an incident that sent the nation into an uproar.

Another defendant, Thanee Toommat, pled guilty to shooting the panther. He received a prison term of 2 years and 17 months in today’s verdict. Under Thai laws, a month of jail sentence consists of 30 days, while a year of prison term counts as 365 days.

Advertisement

Hot News

LATEST NEWS

Bangkok
overcast clouds
33.8 ° C
35 °
32.2 °
63 %
3.6kmh
100 %
Sat
37 °
Sun
36 °
Mon
35 °
Tue
34 °
Wed
33 °