30 C
Bangkok
Sunday, June 28, 2026
Home Blog Page 1694

Checks, Tie-Dye, Baby Dolls: It’s All at London Fashion Week

Model Pixie Geldof wears a creation by designer House of Holland at the Autumn/Winter 2019 fashion week runway show Saturday in London. Photo: Grant Pollard / Associated Press
Model Pixie Geldof wears a creation by designer House of Holland at the Autumn/Winter 2019 fashion week runway show Saturday in London. Photo: Grant Pollard / Associated Press

LONDON — From young talents like Alexa Chung and Simone Rocha to London design veteran Jasper Conran, London Fashion Week showed off a diverse range of womenswear ideas for the upcoming autumn and winter season with a busy day of catwalk shows Saturday.

The spectacle is bringing much needed color and verve as gray London shakes off its winter blues amid the first hints of warmer weather. A look at some highlights:

 

House of Holland

London may not have Paris’s haute couture or Milan’s grand fashion houses, but the British capital has always been proud to be the wild child on the style front.

That irreverent, street-wise London sass was on full display at House of Holland’s show, where designer Henry Holland threw together ’80s power dressing, Asian dress details and loud, clashing tie-dye prints for his latest collection.

Holland said the show was all about the rebellious, and indeed these were flamboyant, look-at-me statement clothes. Models opened Saturday’s show with tailored coats and jackets in the traditional Prince of Wales check – albeit in bright orange and paired with slinky green velvet animal prints.

Then came everything from patchwork print kaftans, oversized silky pussy bow neckties to denim overalls, all worn with berets, clunky platform boots and plenty of attitude.

Quilted jackets and miniskirts, Mandarin collars and obi tie belts brought an Asian aesthetic. The designer emphasized a “global citizen” as his show’s theme and incorporated traditional Cambodian textile techniques into the urban mix.

Models wears creations by designer Jasper Conran at the Autumn/Winter 2019 fashion week runway show Saturday in London. Photo: Grant Pollard / Associated Press
Models wears creations by designer Jasper Conran at the Autumn/Winter 2019 fashion week runway show Saturday in London. Photo: Grant Pollard / Associated Press

Monastic Chic at Jasper Conran

Who knew monks’ garbs could be so fashionable?

High necks, long sleeves, dropped waistlines, skirts that brush the calf or ankle: Veteran designer Jasper Conran took inspiration from “monastic” shapes with a new collection of utilitarian, sleek tunics and dresses that quietly exuded sophistication rather than screamed glamour.

Conran, a founding father of London Fashion Week, dialed down his signature flair for color for the upcoming autumn and winter season, opting instead for a mostly severe palette of earthy browns, rust, mustard and indigo.

The designer focused on dresses that rival the comfort of sportswear. Some outfits – like several brown-all-over sweater dresses – bring to mind something a friar might wear. But Conran always kept things modern with a thigh-high side slit here, a slashed neckline there, a bright sporty piping or geometric color blocks.

Conran ditched the covered-up look for the show’s final section, a collection of architectural column gowns. The colors are still understated here, but bare shoulders and sheer organza panels brought out the drama.

 

Simone Rocha Impresses With Imaginative Show

Designer Simone Rocha turned in a bold, confident show impressive for its variety and thoughtfulness. Even American Vogue editor Anna Wintour skipped her signature sunglasses for a closer look at the stunning array of ensembles.

Rocha seems to grow in stature each year, earning her reputation as one of the major new talents on the London scene. She said the theme Saturday was “intimacy, privacy, security, femininity.”

There was no single look to the show, but Rocha did experiment with outfits that used sparkly bras or camisole tops on top of dresses. Elaborate coat-dresses, some with gauzy skirts, appeared, along with ethereal, pale pink dresses and one extremely gaudy gold number.

A series of gorgeous, black-themed floral dresses, many tiaras, some whimsical Alice In Wonderland dresses and updated baby doll outfits also turned up.

Rocha’s approach was playful, but her fashion intent was serious, and she made a point of using some slightly older models and also ones who were not rail-thin.

She said after the show that she had asked many of her close model friends if they would take part in a show about intimacy and exposure.

“Last season was all about my family, and by the end of it I felt so exposed, like telling everybody about my aunties and uncles,” she said. “I felt like I needed to look in, and I looked at all these photographs of women being exposed.”

 

Alexa Chung Shows Quirky Classics

Model and TV presenter Alexa Chung has a loyal fan base and her many admirers flocked to Saturday’s show in London’s redeveloped King’s Cross neighborhood. They weren’t disappointed as Chung offered a new collection featuring her quirky, feminine take on classic designs.

For her second London Fashion Week show, called “Off the Grid,” the designer announced she had lost all interest in “prettiness” and was imagining a “gaggle of women” who have retreated to California’s Big Sur coastal wilderness to regroup.

Some of the models wear long coats with matching head scarves that are evocative of the American prairie. Many of the deceptively simple dresses emphasize the shoulders, giving the women an outline of physical strength, and much of the outerwear is masculine in style, particularly a forest green suit.

Chung showed an easy, eclectic touch in a collection that included long black coats, several sexy gold dresses, and a few beautiful green midi dresses, including one that she wore to the show.

Story: Sylvia Hui, Gregory Katz

Advertisement

Opinion: Prayuth Returns as Only Viable Anti-Thaksin Candidate

At left, Thaksin Shinawatra's campaign poster from 2004. At right, Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha in an image posted by the Army Cyber Center's Facebook in September.

Re•tention: Pravit Rojanaphruk

Former Princess Ubolratana Mahidol’s short-lived bid to become prime minister – which ended when a royal command opposing her candidacy was issued Feb. 8 – revived the anti-Thaksin Shinawatra camp.

Many who oppose the exiled former prime minister and supported the coup that ousted his sister’s Pheu Thai government in May 2014, have become disappointed at junta leader Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha. But Ubolratana’s surprise nomination by Thai Raksa Chart party – a new pro-Thaksin party with some key Pheu Thai party members – has stoked fears that the ousted leader might again pull the strings of power from backstage in the March general elections.

The fact that the pro-Thaksin party has the support of an immediate member of the royal family frightened royalists who hate the fugitive former premier. Now – like never since the May 2014 coup – those opposing the ousted leader feel threatened and will likely support Prayuth and the pro-junta Palang Pracharat party in the upcoming poll, as the coupmaker is the only viable anti-Thaksin candidate.

Trying to frame what’s coming in a new light as a result of the Feb. 8 events, Palang Pracharat Party deputy leader Suvit Maesincee wrote on a Tuesday Facebook post that to support Prayuth and his party is to stop the Thaksin-proxy parties from regaining power.

Another pro-junta anti-Thaksin party – Action Coalition for Thailand – is also expected to gain more support for its rabid stance against the former premier and its ultra-royalist ideology. The party’s executive member Anek Laothamatas also posted Tuesday on Facebook questioning the framing of elections as being a showdown between pro-versus-anti-junta forces. Instead, Anek sees them as a showdown between pro- versus anti-monarchy forces.

Their rationale is that by bringing Ubolratana into politics, no matter how briefly, the former princess had taken a stance in support of the pro-Thaksin camp – regarded by self-styled ultra-royalists as being anti-monarchic. They see it as a way to sow division within the royal family. It’s a fact that Ubolratana’s candidacy – which lasted 14 hours before the royal command calling it “highly inappropriate” and unconstitutional was televised – led to both criticism and sympathy for her. Suddenly the public were made to decide whether they support Ubolratana’s candidacy – and one of the key determinants was whether they supported or opposed Thaksin.

Anti-Thaksin camps viewed the coup rumors which spread widely Sunday night – and a fake junta order firing leaders of the armed forces – as a psychological game by the fugitive premier’s supporters to confuse, instil societal chaos and divide the military and the military government.

For those subscribing to this narrative, March 24 will see another epic electoral showdown.
The junta seems to be enjoying the windfall now – combined with the unfair rules of the constitution its rubber-stamped parliament drafted, which enable Prayuth to select all the 250 upper house senators. Given that the upper house will also be allowed to vote the prime minister, pro-junta camps will only need 126 of 500 lower house MPs to reinstall Prayuth as the head of government.

On the other hand, the anti-junta camp is split. Future Forward Party is keeping its distance from pro-Thaksin camps and the Constitutional Court looks likely to dissolve Thai Raksa Chart party in the coming days for dragging the monarchy into politics through Ubolratana’s failed candidacy. This leaves the pro-Thaksin Pheu Thai and Pheu Chart parties to pick up the pieces left by the past week’s political tsunami.

Advertisement

Viral Video Uses Pooches to Explain Dog-Eat-Dog Thai Elections

Photo: Nual the Dog / Facebook

BANGKOK — An amusing and educational animation explaining how the March 24 Thai elections will work – through dog cartoons – was going viral Saturday.

Facebook page Nual the Dog posted an eight-minute animated video Friday night of dogs voting and running for parties, which today had been liked more than 13,000 times and shared more than 14,000.

“The Poodle Party looked as if it was going to win. If they get seats through the party-list system, then it’s ggez for them,” the white dog Nual says, using gaming slang for an easy win to explain why the junta changed the voting system for this election to disadvantage the Pheu Thai paty.

Screen Shot 2019 02 16 at copy

Not only is Thailand’s recent election history explained through dogs, there’s also a simple and easy explanation of gerrymandering and the party-list electoral system – which Thailand used before – and the mixed-member apportionment system, which will be used in March.

pie

Voters will get one vote to choose both their representative and party. MP seats will then be proportionally allocated by party – giving more power to smaller parties. The video explains that because the 250 junta-appointed senators will be allowed to vote for the prime minister and automatically choose incumbent Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha, he will only need 25 percent of the vote in the elected lower house – the House of Representatives – to win.

vote

The Pheu Thai party is represented by a pink poodle, with one part of the video even showing an uncanny likeness between it and the party’s prime minister candidate Sudarat Keyuraphan. The Democrat Party are suited Corgis. The ruling junta – called the “municipal gang” in the video – are represented as dogcatchers. Firebrand politico Suthep Thaugsuban’s party is briefly represented as a bulldog with a whistle around its neck, in reference to him leading street protests which paved the way for the 2014 coup.

sudarat

“You can feel hopeless with the system, and that’s your right. But if you don’t exercise your voting rights, when there’s something fucked up or stupid corruption happening later, know that your apathy contributed to that crappiness,” Nual said.

“You gotta choose the MPs you want to represent you. The money they’re using is your money,” Nual said. “If you’re one of the dogs that want change, please go vote. A dog is begging you.”

Nual added that the clip had not been sponsored by any political party.

pdrcDOGCATCH

Related stories:

Thai Election for Dummies: Find Your Polling Place, Candidates – Right Now

Thai Election for Dummies: Guide to the Parties

Thai Election for Dummies: How, When, Where to Cast Your Vote

Advertisement

Court Orders Voice TV Back On Air

Voice TV logo. Image: Voice TV / Wikimedia Commons

Update Feb. 27: The Administrative Court on Wednesday lifted the 15-day ban of Voice TV ordered by the broadcast regulator. The channel has remained on air while the case was considered.

BANGKOK — A TV channel authorities ordered off the air earlier this week was back Friday due to a court ruling.

The Administrative Court ruled at 9pm that Voice TV could continue broadcasting after the National Broadcasting and Communication Commission ordered the channel off the air on Monday.

The court said ordering Voice TV off the air would result in “irreparable” and “difficult to recall” losses for the channel and loss of trust from its viewers.

The court ruled that the Thai constitution included the protection of press freedom, and that broadcasters could only be ordered off the air if their content broke Article 37 of the Broadcasting and Television Businesses Act of B.E. 2551.

The act states that broadcasters can be suspended only if their content “supports the destruction of democracy with the King as its head of state or affects national security and public order and morals.”

Such content could be ordered amended or have the broadcaster’s rights revoked.

The National Broadcasting Communication Commission can file an appeal to the Supreme Court within 30 days, if displeased with the Administrative Court’s decision.

Voice TV was founded by Panthongtae “Oak” Shinawatra, son of fugitive former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and a member of the Pheu Thai party. Since the May 2014 coup, the channel has been targeted by shutdowns 18 times, according to Voice’s online editor Pinpaka Ngamsom.

“The authorities want to shut citizens’ eyes and ears as the election draws near. They think they can do anything they want,” Facebook user Langsuan Panyutphoom commented Friday on a news article about the channel resuming its broadcast.

Related stories:

Voice TV Ordered Off the Air 15 Days

Advertisement

Trump Claims Japan’s PM Nominated Him for Nobel Peace Prize

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and President Donald Trump make statements in 2017 about North Korea at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida. Photo: Susan Walsh / Associated Press
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and President Donald Trump make statements in 2017 about North Korea at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida. Photo: Susan Walsh / Associated Press

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump claimed Friday that Japan’s prime minister had nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize for opening a dialogue with North Korea.

Trump also complained about President Barack Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize and doubted he would be similarly honored.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe “gave me the most beautiful copy of a letter that he sent to the people who give out a thing called the Nobel Prize,” Trump said at a White House news conference when asked about his late February summit in Vietnam with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. “He said, ‘I have nominated you, respectfully, on behalf of Japan. I am asking them to give you the Nobel Peace Prize.'”

The Associated Press could not immediately confirm Trump’s claim.

Japan’s Foreign Ministry said Saturday that it was aware of Trump’s remark but cannot comment on details of the exchanges between Trump and Abe.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in, who also has credited Trump with starting negotiations with the reclusive North, has endorsed the U.S. leader for the Nobel Peace Prize as well.

Trump said early exchanges with Kim were filled with “fire and fury,” but that the two have established a good relationship since their first meeting last year in Singapore. He said claimed Abe nominated him because he was worried about North Korea conducting missile tests over Japan.

Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, his first year in office, for laying out the U.S. commitment to “seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.”

Trump complained Friday that Obama was there “for about 15 seconds” before he was awarded the prize.

“I’ll probably never get it, but that’s OK,” Trump said. “They gave it to Obama. He didn’t even know what he got it for.”

Story: Deb Riechman

Advertisement

Egypt Lawmakers Approve Possible 3-Decade Rule by President

Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, right, talks with Saudi King Salman in 2016 after the monarch arrived in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. Photo: Associated Press
Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, right, talks with Saudi King Salman in 2016 after the monarch arrived in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. Photo: Associated Press

CAIRO — Egyptian lawmakers voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to extend term limits for President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi until 2034, part of a package of constitutional amendments also set to further enshrine the military’s role in politics that will now face a national referendum.

Of the 596-seat Parliament, 485 lawmakers backed the amendments, which could see the former general ruling for the length of four U.S. presidential terms, in addition to the nearly five years he’s already spent in office.

Critics of the move argue that Egypt is slipping back into authoritarianism, eight years after a pro-democracy uprising ended autocrat Hosni Mubarak’s three-decade rule, and nearly six years after el-Sissi led a popular military overthrow of the country’s first freely elected but divisive Islamist president, Mohammed Morsi, after protests against his rule.

With Parliament and state institutions packed with fervent el-Sissi supporters, the amendments focusing on him are almost certain to survive any scrutiny, allowing the general-turned president 12 more years of potential rule after his second term expires in 2022.

Parliament Speaker Ali Abdel-Al said the motion would now be discussed by the Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee for 60 days before returning to Parliament for a final vote followed by the referendum, likely to take place before early May, the start of Ramadan.

Despite the overwhelming support, a group of politicians, public figures and authors of the current 2014 constitution immediately launched an open letter rejecting the amendments as a power grab by el-Sissi, calling for signatures and describing the move as illegal.

“The essence of the proposed constitutional amendment process is to enable the current president to continue ruling for more than two terms, in violation of the current constitution, concentrating all powers in his hand and tightening the executive’s grip on judicial bodies,” the initial 200 signatories wrote.

It added that the move would ruin any chances of a future peaceful transfer of power and halt Egypt’s progress toward becoming a modern democratic state.

Thursday’s vote followed three rounds of discussions among representative lawmakers that started the previous day. Very few opposed openly the amendments focusing on el-Sissi or the military. Abdel-Al’s statement mentioned neither specifically.

Since taking office, el-Sissi has led an unprecedented crackdown on dissent, opposition and civil liberties, justifying his unique leadership as necessary to bring stability and economic growth.

Human Rights Watch says the amendments would undermine judicial independence and expand executive powers that are already being abused in Egypt. The group says over 15,000 civilians, including children, have been referred to military prosecution in Egypt.

Rights researchers broadly agree that Egypt holds tens of thousands of political prisoners – mostly Islamists but also some secular liberals – under a penal system widely condemned as cruel and sloppy. El-Sissi denies the charges categorically.

In general terms, the amendments only extend a president’s term in office from four to six years. But they include a special article that only applies to el-Sissi and allows him to run two more times for six-year terms – possibly having his rule end up bridging three decades.

El-Sissi was elected president in 2014, and re-elected last year after all potentially serious challengers were either jailed or pressured to exit the race.

The amendments also include clauses allowing the president to appoint top judges and bypass judiciary oversight in vetting draft legislation before it is voted into law. They declare the country’s military “guardian and protector” of the Egyptian state, democracy and the constitution, while also granting military courts wider jurisdiction in trying civilians.

Story: Brian Rohan

Advertisement

Myanmar Court Sentences 2 to Death for Killing Suu Kyi Aide

Myanmar opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi briefs the media after a meeting with Norway Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg at the Norway government guest house in 2012 in Oslo, Norway. Photo: Markus Schreiber / Associated Press
Myanmar opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi briefs the media after a meeting with Norway Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg at the Norway government guest house in 2012 in Oslo, Norway. Photo: Markus Schreiber / Associated Press

YANGON — A court in Myanmar on Friday sentenced two men to death for the killing of a prominent Muslim lawyer who was a close adviser to the country’s top leader, Aung San Suu Kyi.

The Yangon Northern District Court found the gunman, Kyi Lin, guilty of premeditated murder and illegal weapons possession for the Jan. 29, 2017 shooting of Ko Ni in broad daylight at Yangon airport. An accomplice involved in planning the killing was also sentenced to death, and two other men involved in the crime received prison sentences.

A fifth suspect thought to be the crime’s mastermind remains at large.

Ko Ni was shot in the head at close range on Jan. 29, 2017, as he walked out of the airport after returning from a working trip to Indonesia. Closed-circuit television footage showed he was shot near a taxi stand as he held his 5-year-old grandchild.

Onlookers chased down the gunman, catching him only after he also shot dead a taxi driver who was one of his pursuers. An ex-convict previously imprisoned for illegally trading in antiquities such as sculptures of Buddha, Kyi Lin also received a 20-year sentence for killing the taxi driver.

The death penalty in Myanmar is carried out by hanging but no executions appear to have been carried out since 1988. Many prisoners on death row have had their sentences commuted.

The failure to apprehend the crime’s alleged mastermind left many questions about the motivation for the killing, especially with the defendants offering contradictory testimony.

Speculation about the reasons Ko Ni was targeted focused on two possibilities.

Ko Ni was noted for criticizing army interference in politics and advised Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy on ways to get around articles in the army-imposed constitution that give the military wide powers even after Myanmar’s transition to democracy. Her party got around a ban on her becoming president by simply creating a new executive post, state counsellor, with presidential powers.

The fact that two of the defendants are former army officers fueled theories that the military was involved with the crime, an accusation it denies.

As a prominent advocate for the Muslim minority in overwhelmingly Buddhist Myanmar, Ko Ni was also a target of abuse from ultra-nationalist Buddhist monks and their allies, some of whom publicly gloated after his death. Myanmar has been gripped by anti-Muslim sentiment in recent years after deadly communal violence in the western state of Rakhine, home to many Muslims from the Rohingya ethnic minority.

Home Affairs Minister Lt. Gen. Kyaw Swe said during investigation of the crime that the authorities believed that it was a “personal grudge” and “extreme sense of nationalism” that led the suspects to carry out the assassination. Police said the murder plot was hatched around April 2016, when its alleged planners were talking at a tea shop. Ex-convict Kyi Lin was hired to be the gunman and reportedly paid almost $60,000.

A separate statement issued at the time by the president’s office urged people “to be fully aware of religious and racial incitements, and attempts to destabilize the situation,” an apparent reference to speculation that anti-Muslim prejudice might have contributed to Ko Ni’s death.

The second man sentenced to death Friday was Aung Win Zaw, who was filmed by CCTV at the airport on the day of the killing.

Another alleged planner, Zayar Phyo, who had told the court he had been framed, received a five-year prison sentence, while Aung Win Tun, charged with harboring one of the suspects, got three years.

The alleged mastermind, Aung Win Khine – also known as Aung Win Khaing – was charged with premeditated murder but his whereabouts are unknown.

Interpol, the international police agency, has at the request of Myanmar authorities issued a “Red Notice” informing all its members that a warrant has been issued for his arrest and asking that he be held for extradition.

Advertisement

Missing Thai Woman Found Walking 600 KM From Home

Kaewmanee Archor arrives in Chiang Rai on Friday.

CHIANG RAI — A 59-year-old woman who went missing eight months ago has been found walking on a road about 600 kilometers from her home – in China.

With assistance from Chinese authorities, Kaewmanee Archor, who reportedly suffers from dementia, was flown back to her hometown in Chiang Rai province this afternoon. Police chief Ponganan Klaikleung said Kaewmanee told authorities she didn’t know how she made it to Kunming, China.

“It’s very good news that Mrs. Kaewmanee has returned safely to the embrace of her daughter,” Maj. Gen. Ponganan told reporters. “We will coordinate with the Ministry of Human Security to assist her in getting by … so that she can continue living normally.”

Kaewmanee was reported missing to Chiang Rai police on June 12, 2018, by her daughter Suchada Archor, who told the media that Kaewmanee had trouble remembering things.

Maj. Ponganan said Chinese officials alerted the Thai immigration bureau earlier this week that a Thai woman had been found wandering close to Kunming without travel documents. They later identified her as Kaewmanee, the police said.

According to Ponganan, the woman lost 20 kilograms while away from home but otherwise remains healthy.

Suchada said her mother maintains that she can’t remember anything about the journey, and couldn’t explain how she could have traveled 600 kilometers without assistance. It is also unclear how she crossed the border.

Kunming is in the southern region of Yunnan, separated from Thailand by mountainous regions of Laos and Myanmar.

Advertisement

Congress OKs Border Deal; Trump Will Sign, Declare Emergency

A Donald Trump supporter flexes his muscles in 2017 with the words
A Donald Trump supporter flexes his muscles in 2017 with the words "Build The Wall" written on them as Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Plattsburgh, New York. Photo: Elise Amendola / Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Congress lopsidedly approved a border security compromise Thursday that would avert a second painful government shutdown, but a new confrontation was ignited – this time over President Donald Trump’s plan to bypass lawmakers and declare a national emergency to siphon billions from other federal coffers for his wall on the Mexican boundary.

Money in the bill for border barriers, about USD$1.4 billion, is far below the $5.7 billion Trump insisted he needed and would finance just a quarter of the 200-plus miles he wanted. The White House said he’d sign the legislation but act unilaterally to get more, prompting condemnations from Democrats and threats of lawsuits from states and others who might lose federal money or said Trump was abusing his authority.

The uproar over Trump’s next move cast an uncertain shadow over what had been a rare display of bipartisanship to address the grinding battle between the White House and lawmakers over border security.

The Senate passed the legislation 83-16, with both parties solidly aboard. The House followed with a 300-128 tally, with Trump’s signature planned Friday. Trump will speak Friday morning in the Rose Garden about border security, the White House said.

House Democrats overwhelmingly backed the legislation, with only 19 – most of whom were Hispanic – opposed. Just over half of Republicans voted “no.”

Should Trump change his mind, both chambers’ margins were above the two-thirds majorities needed to override presidential vetoes. Lawmakers, however, sometimes rally behind presidents of the same party in such battles.

Lawmakers exuded relief that the agreement had averted a fresh closure of federal agencies just three weeks after a record-setting 35-day partial shutdown that drew an unambiguous thumbs-down from the public. But in announcing that Trump would sign the accord, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders also said he’d take “other executive action, including a national emergency,”

In an unusual joint statement, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said such a declaration would be “a lawless act, a gross abuse of the power of the presidency and a desperate attempt to distract” from Trump’s failure to force Mexico to pay for the wall, as he’s promised for years.

“Congress will defend our constitutional authorities,” they said. They declined to say whether that meant lawsuits or votes on resolutions to prevent Trump from unilaterally shifting money to wall-building, with aides saying they’d wait to see what he does.

Democratic state attorneys general said they’d consider legal action to block Trump. Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rossello told the president on Twitter “we’ll see you in court” if he makes the declaration.

Despite widespread opposition in Congress to proclaiming an emergency, including by some Republicans, Trump is under pressure to act unilaterally to soothe his conservative base and avoid looking like he’s lost his wall battle.

The abrupt announcement of Trump’s plans came late in an afternoon of rumblings that the volatile president – who’d strongly hinted he’d sign the agreement but wasn’t definitive – was shifting toward rejecting it. That would have infused fresh chaos into a fight both parties are desperate to leave behind, a thought that drove some lawmakers to ask heavenly help.

“Let’s all pray that the president will have wisdom to sign the bill so the government doesn’t shut down,” Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said Thursday’s Senate session opened.

Moments before Sanders spoke at the White House, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., took to the Senate floor to announce Trump’s decisions to sign the bill and declare an emergency.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told reporters there were two hours of phone calls between McConnell and the White House before there were assurances that Trump would sign.

McConnell argued that the bill delivered victories for Trump over Pelosi. These included overcoming her pledge to not fund the wall at all and rejecting a Democratic proposal for numerical limits on detaining some immigrants, said a Republican speaking on condition of anonymity to describe private conversations.

In a surprising development, McConnell said he would support Trump’s emergency declaration, a turnabout for the Kentucky Republican, who like many lawmakers had opposed such action.

Democrats say there is no border crisis and Trump would be using a declaration simply to sidestep Congress. Some Republicans warn that future Democratic presidents could use his precedent to force spending on their own priorities, like gun control. GOP critics included Maine Sen. Susan Collins, who said emergency declarations are for “major natural disasters or catastrophic events” and said its use would be of “dubious constitutionality.”

White House staff and congressional Republicans have said that besides an emergency, Trump might assert other authorities that could conceivably put him within reach of billions of dollars. The money could come from funds targeted for military construction, disaster relief and counterdrug efforts.

Congressional aides say there is $21 billion for military construction that Trump could used if he declares a national emergency. By law, the money must be used to support U.S. armed forces, they say.The Defense Department declined to provide details on available money.

With many of the Democrats’ liberal base voters adamantly against Trump’s aggressive attempts to curb immigration, four declared presidential hopefuls opposed the bill in the Senate: Cory Booker of New Jersey, New York’s Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Kamala Harris of California. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota voted for it, as did Vermont independent Bernie Sanders, who is expected to join the field soon.

Notably, the word “wall,” the heart of many a chant at Trump campaign events and his rallies as president, is absent from the compromise’s 1,768-page legislative and descriptive language. “Barriers” and “fencing” are the nouns of choice, a victory for Democrats eager to deny Trump even a rhetorical victory.

The agreement, which took bargainers three weeks to strike, would also squeeze funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, in an attempt to pressure the agency to detain fewer immigrants. To the dismay of Democrats, however, it would still leave an agency many of them consider abusive holding thousands more immigrants than last year.

The measure contains money for improved surveillance equipment, more customs agents and humanitarian aid for detained immigrants. The overall bill also provides $330 billion to finance dozens of federal programs for the rest of the year, one-fourth of federal agency budgets.

Trump sparked the last shutdown before Christmas after Democrats snubbed his $5.7 billion demand for the wall. The closure denied paychecks to 800,000 federal workers, hurt contractors and people reliant on government services and was loathed by the public.

With polls showing the public blamed him and GOP lawmakers, Trump folded on Jan. 25 without getting any of the wall funds. His capitulation was a political fiasco for Republicans and handed Pelosi a victory less than a month after Democrats took over the House and confronted Trump with a formidable rival for power.

Trump’s descriptions of the wall have fluctuated, at times saying it would cover 1,000 miles of the 2,000-mile boundary. Previous administrations constructed over 650 miles of barriers.

Story: Alan Fram, Catherine Lucey, Andrew Taylor 

Advertisement

Please Stop Killing Trees With Your Politics: City Hall

Photos of campaign posters in Bangkok posted to twitter by @PiyachatSangkh, at left, and @Oatasis.
Photos of campaign posters in Bangkok posted to twitter by @PiyachatSangkh, at left, and @Oatasis.

BANGKOK — Please don’t kill the capital’s trees by nailing campaign posters onto them, City Hall said Friday.

With campaign posters appearing on every vertical surface in Bangkok less than two months from Election Day, a city official came out to reiterate that parties aren’t allowed to hang wood-framed posters on trees, which she said is tantamount to damaging city property.

“We’ve found PM candidates hanging posters on trees by using nails or metal wires. It might kill these trees,” said Silapasuay Raweesaengsoun, the administration’s deputy permanent secretary.

She said City Hall would warn candidates if it finds their posters hanging on trees, adding that it would take action against those who refuse to remove them.

Damaging public property carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a 100,000-baht fine.

Campaign posters also triggered complaints from pedestrians for blocking city sidewalks and obstructing their view at bus stops. It has led to the creation of #blockingposter on Twitter, which has been used to report posters that obstruct the way.

Advertisement

Hot News

LATEST NEWS

Bangkok
overcast clouds
30 ° C
31.6 °
30 °
75 %
4.7kmh
100 %
Sun
31 °
Mon
33 °
Tue
33 °
Wed
31 °
Thu
29 °