30 C
Bangkok
Sunday, June 28, 2026
Home Blog Page 1174

Police Quickly Blame Guard Rivalry For Gun Attack at Protest

Forensic police investigate the shooting at the pro-democracy protest in Bangkok on Nov. 26, 2020.

BANGKOK — Police on Thursday said “internal conflicts” among groups of protesters’ security details are to blame for the gun and explosive attack that wounded at least one person near a protest on Wednesday night

Deputy metropolitan police chief Piya Tawichai said the attacks were part of a fight that broke out between volunteer guards from rival polytechnic schools, just as protesters were leaving their rally in front of the Siam Commercial Bank’s main office.

But many anti-government critics cast doubt on the swift judgment, which came less than 24 hours after the shooting. The national police chief also said an investigation is still ongoing.

“We found that the perpetrators were from Minburi Polytechnic Technology College, while the victims were from Pathum Thani Vocational College,” Maj. Gen. Piya said. “I confirm that both groups are members of the protesters’ volunteer guard unit.”

He added, “The fight broke out due to work issues. There’s no outsiders involved.”

However, national police commissioner Suwat Chaengyodsuk told reporters that the investigation is still ongoing. He declined to name any motives.

According to eyewitnesses, a loud bang was heard followed by three to four gunshots at around 10.15pm, about an hour after the protest formally ended. A group of men were seen running away from the scene, though one of them tripped over and fell.

At least two people were reportedly injured. One of them is a protester guard who sustained gunshot wounds, while another is said to be one of the assailants, who was beaten up in a scrum that broke out after he was caught by the protesters, police said.

20201125173419 IMG 0020
Pro-democracy protest in front of the Siam Commercial Bank headquarters in Bangkok on Nov. 25, 2020.

One of the members of the Free People volunteer guard group who would only identify herself as Preaw said the perpetrators might have been royalist supporters, since photos circulating on social media suggested that they had participated in one of the pro-establishment rallies.

“We don’t know who they are,” Preaw said. “But photos suggest that they might have belonged to the other side. My friend in the vocational student group told me that he did not recognize the men even though they were wearing the group’s armband.”

Preaw was at the scene when the shooting broke out. She said it was chaotic after a loud explosion was heard and people rushed to find a cover.

“There was a confusion over which direction the sound was coming from,” she said.
“When I got up, all I could see was people running and screaming.”

S 5030124
Pro-democracy protest in front of the Siam Commercial Bank headquarters in Bangkok on Nov. 25, 2020.

Forensic police later found traces of bullets and fragments of what appeared to be an improvised explosive device at the scene, though Piya said it remains unclear what type of device was used.

The alleged assailant apprehended by the protesters was identified as Pasapong Kulla-amornkarn, 25. Police said they found a .38 revolver on him, but it is unclear whether it was the same firearm used in the shooting.

The confrontation was also captured live on camera by The Standard news agency, which shows a man throwing what appeared to be an explosive at the protesters in front of The Avenue mall, close to the rally site.

Thanakorn Wongpanya, who was covering the protest for The Standard, told Thairath TV he heard a noisy quarrel shortly before he noticed a man throwing something at the demonstrators. He said he did not see where the assailants went after carrying out the attack.

The Gear of Red Thonburi group, which oversees vocational student volunteer guards, said in a statement that the attack was carried out by certain individuals who had “infiltrated” its ranks to cause violence.

“It’s clear that a certain group of people from the faction which seeks to use violence against pro-democracy protesters had infiltrated one of the vocational student groups to instigate unrest,” the statement said.

“The group will continue to uphold peaceful principles and will keep on fighting without any weapons.”

Next protest is called for Friday, but the location has yet to be announced.

Advertisement

Photog Who Broke Norms for Modern Thai Women Dies at 90 (Photos)

Left: Orasa Israngkura na Ayutthaya, photographed by S.H. Lim (1967). Right: Bhaovana Chanajit with S.H. Lim(1967).

Photos courtesy of Manit Sriwanichpoom

BANGKOK  — A prolific photographer who shot beauties to stardom with his iconic snaps during Thailand’s Golden Age of Cinema – while challenging morals instilled by military regimes and influencing generations of Thai women – died earlier this month, his family announced Friday.

S.H. Lim, known in Thailand as Vivat Pitayaviriyakul, died on Nov. 4 at 90 years old in Bangkok after being hospitalized due to a fall. His death was confirmed by Manit Sriwanichpoom, contemporary artist and the curator of Kathmandu Gallery who last exhibited Lim’s works in 2011.

“His photos showed how Thai society was changing into an industrialized country from an agricultural one,” Manit said. “He was able to understand the coming world and the changing status of women.”

The son of a worker at Shell company, Lim was born in 1930 to an ethnic Chinese family and went on to study abroad in Singapore. Rather than finishing school, he pursued photography – a field seen as an unstable profession at the time – without any formal training. He taught himself to take photos with his father’s Agfa camera.

04 Phusadee Anukkhamontri around 1967 copy
Phusadee Anukkhamontri, taken by S.H. Lim in 1967.

But Lim’s photos of the joyful, modern woman made the covers of increasingly popular fashion and lifestyle magazines. Sometimes he would ask women on the street if they could be his models, then ask tailor shops to sponsor their clothing. 

If she got on a cover, she could have a chance of a career in the silver screen, since directors and film crews would rifle through these magazines to scout for their next star. 

“Women liked to buy these because they gave advice on how to live life and how to dress in the modern world,” Manit said. “If a woman was photographed for the cover, then she was more likely to become a star in fashion or reach stardom in movies.” 

13 Apasra Hongsakula 1965
Apasra Hongsakula, taken by S.H. Lim in 1965.

Lim told Manit that while he was starting out, he was paid around 150 baht for each magazine cover. 

To be on Lim’s lens soon became a rite of passage for any aspiring actress or model. During his work from 1962 until his retirement in 1987, Lim photographed most of the era’s actresses, starlets, and beauty queens.

“They all passed through his lens,” Manit said. 

For instance, Lim was the first to photograph Petchara “Miss Honey Eyes” Chaowarat, who would go on to become the most sought after actress in Thailand’s version of Hollywood. Also photographed were Thailand’s first Miss Universe Apasra Hongsakul in 1965, and Miss Thailand 1967 Apuntree Prayuthsenee. 

He mostly published his photographs in women’s magazines such as Bangkok Weekly, Phloenjit, Sakul Thai, Or Sor Tor (owned by the Tourism Authority of Thailand), Saensuk, and so on. 

06 Nude around 1967
S.H. Lim’s nude of a Hong Kong woman, around 1967.

 

In 1963, Lim won both the silver and bronze medals at the New York Kodak Expo Photography Contest. In 2005, almost two decades after his retirement, The Federation of Photographic Associations of Thailand named him their photographer of the year.

‘The Brash Woman’ 

One of Manit’s favorite photos by Lim is of Orasa Israngkura na Ayutthaya, an actress and dancer leaping into the air with palm fronds fringing the edges. 

“You can see the freedom, the cheerfulness. Her feet are not touching the ground; she has the freedom to fly,” Manit said. “You can see here that the modern woman isn’t a proper housewife. He took photos of the brash woman, not just the usual Thai women in traditional dress.”

09 Kwanjai Sa artrak 1967
Kwanjai Sa-artrak photographed by S.H. Lim in 1967.

Lim’s photos are even more striking when seen in the context that the conservative powers-at-be at the time explicitly condemned trending clothing such as miniskirts for causing “degeneration,” “audaciousness and sin.” 

“Society had the idea about who women’s role models should be: she has to be a demure housewife, and act as the elephant’s back legs,” Manit said, referring to a traditional proverb that attributes men as the “front legs,” or leadership positions. 

“But S.H. Lim’s photos changed that. He showed that women should be modern and confident, changing that ideal.” 

An exemplary example of one of Lim’s daringly modern photos is of the truly groovy Pussadee Wongkamhang in a plastic dress with a cocked pistol, an ode to James Bond films at the time. 

03 Phusadee Anukkhamontri around 1967
Phusadee Anukkhamontri by S.H. Lim.

However, pushing the envelope the way he did did result in some scandal – for the models. 

At the time, published nude or semi-nude photos would often feature foreign models in an attempt to offset some criticism that would be leveraged at a Thai woman. For this reason, Lim’s nude of a woman dressed only in a piece of cloth leaning against a tree featured a Hong Kong model.

One of the biggest scandals his photo caused was the photoshoot with screen siren Priya Rungruang in 1987 taken in a private photoshoot with just the two at Koh Larn.

“There was a lot of hubbub over the photo of her back turned to the camera and her bikini top in the foreground,” Manit said. “Compared to nowadays, that photo is quite tame, but people were saying all over town that she was a bad woman.” 

01 Priya Rungruang 1967
Priya Rungruang photographed by S.H. Lim (1967)

Oftentimes, even negative press would help promote a star’s movie if it was coming into theaters soon. 

Still, after some saucy photos were published, some gossip rags would speculate that sugar daddies were looking to take care of so-and-so, Manit said.

Happy, Beautiful, and Free

Lim, a slight man even smaller than many of his models, was very serious with his craft and had a talent where he was able to earn their trust. 

“He was very respectful towards women. The relationship between him and the models were of mutual respect. He would never say things or push them to sell sexiness or anything like that. He positioned the women in his photos as beautiful,” Manit said.

To 2020 eyes who have seen their share of oversaturated social media influencer, Lim’s models startlingly real in their proudly voluptuous bodies, in the pre-Photoshop, pre-filters era.

02 Priya Rungruang Pattaya 1967
Priya Rungruang photographed by S.H. Lim in 1967.

“The models he chose are not according to today’s standards: some are quite full and curvy, rather than picking skinny, even weak-looking ones. Priya was even a bit meaty. Nowadays Thai look like they have to have anorexia,” Manit said. 

Perhaps what Vivat will be best remembered for is capturing moments of women at their happiest for eternal viewing. 

“When I saw his work, the women in his photographs looked so happy. They looked more empowered than sexualized,” New York-based museum curator Faith Cooper said. 

Cooper had recently posted some of Lim’s photographs on her Asian Fashion Archive Instagram page.

“You can tell they felt comfortable with him, so his photographs really spoke to me,” she said. 

16 Sopha Sathaporn 1968
Sopha Sathaporn photographed by S.H. Lim in 1968.
07 Orasa Issarangkura Pattaya 1967
Orasa Israngkura na Ayutthaya, photographed by S.H. Lim (1967).
SH Lim giving an interview to Thai PBS at Kathmandu Photo Gallery 5 02 2011 copy
S.H. Lim gives a press interview in 2011 at Kathmandu Photo Gallery at an exhibition of his photographs. Photo: Manit Sriwanichpoom / Courtesy

Related stories:

How Miniskirts Riled Up Thai Dictatorship in the Late 60s

Advertisement

Meet Ms. Jigger – A Downtown Bangkok Bar with Some Personality

Aaron Feder behind the bar at Ms. Jigger.

BANGKOK — If a hard-drinking, globetrotting Siamese woman hitched trains to Europe and back to open a bar, Ms. Jigger thinks it’s that bar.

Opened just in November, Ms. Jigger, located on the ground floor of the hip magnet Kimpton Maa-Lai Bangkok hotel in the Langsuan area, serves generously strong cocktails and a fictional backstory centered around a Miss Fisher-like character to tie it all together. 

For example, when ordering the “Nuite a Paris,” (433 baht), a cognac cocktail with elderflower liqueur, champagne, and rose, a glass of pink arrives along with a deconstructed macaron on measuring spoons.

IMG 20201118 192350 copy
“Nuite a Paris” (433 baht).

“So Ms. Jigger’s in Paris and this street artist guy’s trying to get into her pants. They’ve got a box of macarons and cheap champagne with them, and she’s just using him as a tour guide to get around the city,” bartender Aaron Feder said. “She’s fuckin’ cool.”

Those drinking will notice at their tables a rolled-up message in a bottle, which unfurls to show the cocktail menu along with blurbs of Ms. Jigger’s adventures in Europe.

IMG 20201118 191112 copy

The Terra-Abruzzo (399 baht), a coquettish pink blend of gin, pine liquor, rosemary and raspberry oleo is a creamy mix with woody scents and is supposed to commemorate Ms. Jigger’s adventure in central Italy, visiting “the gracious and gregarious type of distant relation” and their vineyard that remind her of a many-layered dream.

Feast of Ferragosto (398 baht) is a daring cocktail of genever with egg white and
shaved parmesan to remember that time Ms. Jigger spent harvest season in Italy.

A jigger is a measuring tool used in bartending to measure liquor.

Unfortunately, however, that’s all patrons will get to know about Ms. Jigger. In a prime example of potential unfulfilled, her presence isn’t felt in the hotel decor nor the expensive Italian food.

IMG 20201118 214400 copy
Feast of Ferragosto (398 baht)

The aperitivo combo (690 baht) is an appetizer of tuscan ham, smoked olives, and hunks of parmigiano reggiano, the polpette al sugo piccante (374 baht) are six meatballs in tomato sauce, and the ricotta ravioli comes as three large pieces (456 baht). The lamb chop is 842, and the polipo charred octopus is 725 baht.

DSCF2508 copy
Aperitivo combo (690 baht)

Small for their price are the 24 month parma ham pizza (550 baht) and the tartufata (573 baht) for fans of truffles.

Dessert options include the tender, not-too-sweet Ms. Jigger Tiramisu (374 baht), rather than the Prospino al Limoncello (480 baht) which may only please those who love candied fruits in sorbets.

IMG 20201118 202132 copy
24 month parma ham pizza (550 baht)

 


Have a chat with Aaron if hanging around the bar area. The third-generation bartender from Boston has a lot of stories to tell, and his Boston accent might even slip out.

“My grandfather would kill me if I called myself a mixologist,” Feder said jokingly.

Ms. Jigger is open from 11:30am to 2:30 pm for lunch and from 5:30pm to midnight every day except Tuesdays. The Kimpton Maa-Lai is located on Langsuan Road, about 800 meters away from BTS Chit Lom.

IMG 20201118 200141 copy
Polpette al sugo piccante (374 baht)

IMG 20201118 183429 copy IMG 20201118 211451 copy IMG 20201118 181352 copy IMG 20201118 184438

Advertisement

Thailand’s COVID-19 Vaccine Production To Start in Mid-2021

A file photo of vaccine researchers at the National Research Council of Thailand

BANGKOK (Xinhua) — Thailand’s National Vaccine Institute said on Tuesday that local COVID-19 vaccine’s production is scheduled to begin in mid-2021.

The COVID-19 production technology will be transferred from the AstraZeneca-Oxford University alliance, the institute’s director Nakorn Premsri said.

The director said Thailand had participated in the alliance’s vaccine development project, which had confirmed the average efficacy of 70 percent for their ongoing third-phase trial.

Thai pharmaceutical company Siam Bioscience is also in talks with AstraZeneca about local production in Thailand with an annual capacity of 180 to 200 million doses for use in Thailand and other Southeast Asian nations, Nakorn said.

Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health’s Disease Control Department added that the National Vaccine Committee would decide on the first groups of vaccine recipients next month.

Basically, the first group of recipients usually go to frontline healthcare workers and also people with high risks of transmission, said the department.

Advertisement

China’s Xi Congratulates U.S. President-Elect Biden on Win

China's Vice President Xi Jinping meets with U.S. Vice President Joe Biden at the White House in Washington, February 14, 2012. [Xinhua]

BEIJING (Kyodo) — Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday congratulated Democrat Joe Biden on his election as the next U.S. president, state-run media reported.

China hopes the two countries will “uphold the spirit of non-conflict, non-confrontation, mutual respect and win-win cooperation,” Xi said in a congratulatory message to Biden, according to the official Xinhua News Agency.

Continue reading the story here

Advertisement

Trump Pardons Flynn Despite Guilty Plea in Russia Probe

Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump gives a thumbs up as he speaks with retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn during a town hall, Tuesday, Sept. 6, 2016, in Virginia Beach, Va. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, file)

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump pardoned his former national security adviser Michael Flynn on Wednesday, ending a yearslong prosecution in the Russia investigation that saw Flynn twice plead guilty to lying to the FBI and then reverse himself before the Justice Department stepped in to dismiss his case.

“It is my Great Honor to announce that General Michael T. Flynn has been granted a Full Pardon,” Trump tweeted. “Congratulations to @GenFlynn and his wonderful family, I know you will now have a truly fantastic Thanksgiving!”

The pardon, in the waning weeks of Trump’s single term, is part of a broader effort by Trump to undo the results of a Russia investigation that shadowed his administration and yielded criminal charges against a half-dozen associates. It comes just months after the president commuted the sentence of another associate, Roger Stone, days before he was to report to prison.

A Justice Department official said the department was not consulted on the pardon and learned Wednesday of the plan. But the official, who spoke on condition on anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, noted that the president has the legal power to pardon Flynn.

The move is likely to energize supporters who have taken up Flynn as a cause celebre and rallied around the retired Army lieutenant general as the victim of what they assert is an unfair prosecution, even though Flynn twice admitted guilt. Trump has repeatedly spoken warmly about Flynn and, in an indication of his personal interest in his fate, asked then-FBI Director James Comey in February 2017 to end a criminal investigation into the national security adviser.

In a statement, Flynn’s family thanked Trump “for answering our prayers and the prayers of a nation” by issuing the pardon.

Democrats lambasted the pardon as undeserved and unprincipled. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called it “an act of grave corruption and a brazen abuse of power,” while Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democratic chair of the House Intelligence Committee, said a “pardon by Trump does not erase” the truth of Flynn’s guilty plea, “no matter how Trump and his allies try to suggest otherwise.”

“The President’s enablers have constructed an elaborate narrative in which Trump and Flynn are victims and the Constitution is subject to the whims of the president,” House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler said in a statement. “Americans soundly rejected this nonsense when they voted out President Trump. ”

The pardon is the final step in a case defined by twists and turns. The most dramatic came in May when the Justice Department abruptly moved to dismiss the case, insisting that Flynn should not have been interviewed by the FBI in the first place, only to have U.S. District Justice Emmet Sullivan resist the request and appoint a former judge to argue against the federal government’s position and to evaluate whether Flynn should be held in criminal contempt for perjury.

That former judge, John Gleeson, called the Justice Department’s dismissal request an abuse of power and said its grounds for dropping the case were ever-evolving and “patently pretextual.”

As Sullivan declined to immediately dismiss the prosecution, Flynn lawyer Sidney Powell sought to bypass the judge by asking a federal appeals court to direct him to drop the matter. A three-judge panel did exactly that, but the full court overturned that decision and sent case back to Sullivan.

At a hearing in September, Powell told Sullivan that she had discussed Flynn’s case with Trump but also said she did not want a pardon — presumably because she wanted him to be vindicated in the courts.

Powell emerged separately in recent weeks as a public face of Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of his election loss to President-elect Joe Biden, but the Trump legal team distanced itself from her after she advanced a series of uncorroborated conspiracy claims.

The pardon spares Flynn the possibility of any prison sentence, which Sullivan could potentially have imposed had he ultimately rejected the Justice Department’s dismissal request. That request was made after a review of the case by a federal prosecutor from St. Louis who had been specially appointed by Attorney General William Barr.

At issue in the prosecution was an FBI interview of Flynn, days after Trump’s inauguration, about a conversation he had during the presidential transition period with the then-Russian ambassador.

Flynn acknowledged lying during that interview by saying he had not discussed with the diplomat, Sergey Kislyak, sanctions that the outgoing Obama administration had just been imposed on Russia for election interference. During that conversation, Flynn advised that Russia be “even-keeled” in response to the punitive measures, and assured him “we can have a better conversation” about relations between the countries after Trump became president.

The conversation alarmed the FBI, which at the time was investigating whether the Trump campaign and Russia had coordinated to sway the election. In addition, White House officials were stating publicly that Flynn and Kislyak had not discussed sanctions, which the FBI knew was untrue.

Flynn was ousted from his position in February 2017 after news broke that Obama administration officials had warned the White House that Flynn had indeed discussed sanctions with Kislyak and was vulnerable to blackmail. He pleaded guilty months later to a false statement charge.

But last May, after years of defending the prosecution, the Justice Department abruptly reversed its position.

It asserted the FBI had no basis to interview Flynn about Kislyak and that any statements he made during the interview were not material to the FBI’s broader counterintelligence probe. The department also pointed to internal FBI notes showing agents had planned to close out the investigation weeks before interviewing Flynn about Kislyak.

Flynn, of Middletown, Rhode Island, was among the first people charged in Mueller’s investigation and provided such extensive cooperation that prosecutors did not recommend any prison time, leaving open the possibility of probation.

But the morning he was to have been sentenced, after a stern rebuke about his behavior from Sullivan, Flynn asked for the hearing to be cut short so that he could continue cooperating and earn credit toward a more lenient sentence.

After that, he hired new attorneys — including Powell, a conservative commentator and outspoken critic of Mueller’s investigation — who took a far more confrontational stance to the government and tried to withdraw his guilty plea.

Advertisement

Shots Fired, Explosive Thrown at Protesters; Injuries Reported

Forensic police investigate the shooting at the pro-democracy protest in Bangkok on Nov. 26, 2020.

BANGKOK — Shots were fired by unidentified assailants at pro-democracy protesters as they were leaving their rally at the headquarters of Thailand’s oldest bank on Wednesday night, wounding at least two people.

Eyewitnesses said they heard a loud explosion, followed by 3-4 gunshots, at about 10.15pm, soon after the protest in front of Siam Commercial Bank’s main office concluded. One of the assailants was apprehended while he was trying to run away with others; the rest reportedly managed to flee the scene.

Sombat Thongyoi, one of the volunteer guards who provided security for the protesters, said two people were shot. Both of them were sent to hospital.

“We cannot yet establish whether it was a personal matter or politically motivated,” Sombat said.

Forensic police at the scene said they found traces of bullets; police also said they found a handgun on the man apprehended by the protest guards, though it is unclear as of publication time if it was the same firearm used in the shooting.

A live video by The Standard news agency captured the moment the explosive was thrown at the protesters. It is not immediately confirmed what type of material it was; some reports said a firecracker, others a pipe bomb.

It was the second time in little over a week firearms were used during protests. Just last week, on Nov. 17, gunfire rang out when the guards of the pro-democracy movement clashed with royalists who were gathering close to parliament. Police did not intervene or try to separate the two sides.

Six people were shot, according to the emergency response unit Erawan Center. all of them on the side of the protesters.

The site of tonight’s rally was changed late Tuesday night by leaders of the movement. It was earlier announced that it would be held outside the offices of the Crown Property Bureau, which manages the fortune controlled by His Majesty the King.

The target was switched to the Siam Commercial Bank, a publicly held company in which King Vajiralongkorn is the biggest shareholder. The bank’s headquarters are in a different area of Bangkok, far from the district hosting the Crown Property Bureau and other royal and government offices.

The protest movement announced that the change of venue was to avoid a confrontation with police and royalist counter demonstrators, which it feared could trigger a declaration of martial law or a coup by the military.

Additional reporting by The Associated Press

Advertisement

Police: Return of Lese Majeste Charges is ‘Inevitable’

Protesters hold up signs denouncing the use of Article 112 of the Criminal Codes, or royal defamation, at an anti-government rally on Nov. 25, 2020.

BANGKOK — A senior police officer said Wednesday the charges of royal defamation were filed against protest leaders based on their actions, and not as a retaliation against their activism.

Maj. Gen. Piya Tawichai, deputy Bangkok police chief, confirmed the return of the royal insult, also known as lese majeste, following months-long hiatus at a news conference. Piya said the suspects’ deeds and words force investigators to charge them with the offense.

“If one breaks the law, then so be it. The investigative officers cannot avoid it. Actions show one’s intention. Since they qualify for the law in this provision, we have to charge them with it,” Piya said. “It’s inevitable.”

‘I Don’t Want to Die Before My Mom,’ Monk Fled Thailand for ‘Insulting’ King

The police major general also said a “panel of experts” deliberated on the charges and approved their use against the suspects.

Media reports said up to 12 people were marked for prosecution with lese majeste, including key activist leaders like Parit Chiwarak, Panupong Jadnok, Panusaya Sithijirawattanakul, Arnon Nampha, Piyarat Chongthep, and Passarawalee Thanakitvibulphol.

All of them were involved in undergoing campaigns to call for reforms of the monarchy. Although they insist they do not seek to overthrow the Royal Family, many pro-establishment politicians and their supporters routinely denounce the reformists as republicans in disguise.

They have yet to be formally charged as of publication time.

Lese majeste is punishable by up to 15 years in prison under Article 112 of the Criminal Codes, which bans insults or threats made to the King, the Queen, the Heir Apparent, and the Regent.

The law was also often used to silence any discussions of the monarchy, which were long considered as a taboo in Thai society, though recent protests in Thailand have boldly broken that ceiling.

In June, PM Prayut Chan-o-cha told reporters that His Majesty the King had requested the government not to pursue lese majeste charges against anyone out of royal clemency.

But just last week, PM Prayut said the authorities will now use “every law” in the book to crack down on the protests.

When asked by a reporter whether lese majeste is included, Gen. Prayut shot back, “Do you understand the meaning of every law?”

Parit the activist later confirmed that royal defamation is back in the play. He posted a photo of a summons warrant informing him that he was facing a charge of lese majeste. The warrant also instructed him to report to the police by Dec. 2.

The campaigner said he is unfazed by the move.

“To whoever that came up with the use of this law, let me say it right here that I am not really afraid,” Parit wrote online. The ceiling has collapsed. Nothing will be our limit anymore.”

Note: Some details were omitted from this article due to legal concerns.

Advertisement

Japan PM Defends Travel Subsidy Program Amid Virus Resurgence

Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga. Image: Kyodo.

TOKYO (Kyodo) — Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga on Wednesday defended his government’s decision to continue its economy-boosting travel subsidy campaign, repeating his claim that there is no evidence it caused the nation’s recent coronavirus resurgence.

His remarks at a budget committee meeting in the House of Representatives came a day after the government said it will exclude Sapporo and Osaka from the subsidy program due to an increase in the number of infections in the two cities.

Continue reading the story here

Advertisement

‘The Reporters’ Journalist Suspended After Rape Allegations Surface

Thot Limsodsai’s Facebook cover photo.

Update: Thot resigns from The Reporters on Thursday.

BANGKOK — The head of an up-and-coming news organization on Wednesday said it suspended one of its reporters for a month due to allegations from women who accused him of rapes in university years. 

Thapanee Eadsrichai, founder of The Reporters, posted online that the suspension is a preliminary response to the allegations, which surfaced after the reporter in question was profiled in an advertorial for the news agency. 

“We have investigated all parties, especially the women who understand the feelings and the situations,” Thapanee wrote. “Although this happened in the past before he worked at The Reporters and it was not proven under the law, we want to show our moral responsibility.” 

The suspension is effective immediately, Thapanee said. 

The journalist, Thot Limsodsai, posted an apology on his Facebook, which stopped short of admitting to sexual assault. The statement also did not mention any specific actions.

“I thought about this for a long time because I didn’t want the situation to escalate. I was sad when I found out that my friend has always been emotionally affected. I cannot publicly detail what happened four years ago. I misunderstood what happened. I never had the chance to apologize, so I will apologize now.” 

Thot’s background came under the spotlight after he was featured in The Reporters’ sponsored post on Humans of Bangkok, a popular Facebook page that regularly covers prominent individuals from all walks of life.

The post said Thot attended the Faculty of Journalism and Mass Communication at Thammasat University, and included his testimony on how he first came to work under Thapanee. 

“My professor taught me about media ethics, and said that the media is more than just storytellers, but we must check and balance the state. But the news I was reading online was all clickbait,” the post quoted him as saying.

The advertorial soon backfired, when a number of women began posting about Thot’s past, many of testimonials of which are published on Obsaimai Diary Facebook page. 

In one of the accounts, a woman said that Thot raped her while she was drunk and crashing at his dorm, covering her mouth, beating her, and refusing to use protection. 

“If we run into each other at a bar, he just says sorry, like how people say hi when running into each other. Instead, you say, ‘Oh, sorry I raped you that day,’” the post said. “I’m furious you spoke only about how good you are. Does P’Yam [Thapanee] know that she has a rapist as a reporter?” 

Another woman alleged that Thot groped her at night when she was a second year university student.

“I want to vomit just thinking about the past. And I had to see him smirking and going on with his life happily. But the memory is seared into my heart. I have told very few people about this,” she wrote. 

Although a one-month suspension may seem meagre by international standards – Thapanee did call it a “preliminary” action, however – most sexual assault allegations in Thailand are covered up or receive zero action from employers, especially in schools. 

The incident also came just a few days after a university student spoke out about her experience of being sexually assaulted by her teacher when she was in high school. Her testimony was mostly dismissed by the pro-establishment camp, who took issue with her background as a part time model.

Related stories:

They, Too: Thai Women Reporters Share Tales of Sexual Harassment

Media Guild Sexual Harassment Verdict Criticized

‘Thaiconsent’ Breaks the Silence With Untold Stories

1 in 5 Thais Have Experienced Sexual Harassment, Survey Says

Advertisement

Hot News

LATEST NEWS

Bangkok
overcast clouds
30 ° C
31.6 °
30 °
75 %
4.7kmh
100 %
Sun
31 °
Mon
33 °
Tue
33 °
Wed
31 °
Thu
29 °