British Labour Activist's Libel Trial Starts In BKK Today

The head of Andy Hall's legal team, Nakhon Chompuchat, speaking at a Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand panel on 1 Sept, 2014. [Photo by Gerrit Phil Baumann].

BANGKOK — British labour activist Andy Hall is scheduled to go on trial in Bangkok today to fight charges of defamation for a report he wrote two years ago accusing a Thai food company of mistreating its workers.

Hall, 34, contributed to a report published by the Finish NGO Finnwatch last January that chronicled a number of labour abuses committed by Natural Fruit Co. Ltd., one of Thailand’s biggest pineapple processors. The factory workers Hall interviewed, some of whom were undocumented migrants, described hazardous working conditions, unlawfully low wages, and instances of child labour.
Natural Fruit has denied the allegations and launched several cases against Hall, including charges of criminal defamation, violation of the Computer Crime Act, and demands for 10 million U.S. dollars through a civil suit. If found guilty, Hall could face up to seven years in prison.
Today's trial concerns the defamation charges brought against Hall for an interview he gave to Al-Jazeera about Natural Fruit's alleged labour abuses. Prosecution witnesses are scheduled to begin their testimony in Bangkok’s Prakanong Court today.
Defamation is a criminal offense in Thailand, defined under Thai law as any statement made by one party that is likely to impair the reputation of another party or expose the latter to hatred. The offense is punishable by up to two years in prison and a fine of 200,000 baht.
The law has been frequently criticised by rights activists, who say it is abused by authorities and large corporations to silence critics and create a climate of fear.
Last month, 100 rights organisations from around the world signed a letter asking the Thai Pineapple Industry Association (TPIA) to urge Natural Fruit to drop the case against Hall.
“By refusing to work with civil society and instead launching an aggressive legal battle against Mr. Hall, Natural Fruit is sending a message that it would rather intimidate critics and silence those who advocate on behalf of migrant workers than engage in genuine dialogue about conditions in its factories,” the letter reads.
Earlier this year, two Phuket-based journalists were charged with defamation by the Royal Thai navy for a publishing an excerpt from a Reuters report that alleged Navy officials’ involvement in the trafficking of Rohingya refugees from Myanmar.
Similar to the case against Hall, the law was used to target individuals and not the larger organisations their work was affiliated with. 
“This law is used to intimidate people,” said Supinya Klangnarong, a media rights activist who was charged with defamation for criticizing the Shin Corporation in 2003. “Most of the defamation cases in Thailand are about ‘protecting face.’"
Supinya, who was eventually acquitted after a highly publicised trial, was referring to a common Thai idiom — 'saving/protecting face' (rak sa na) —  that describes a widespread concern with protecting one's reputation or image. Any act that causes someone to 'lose face' (sia na) is considered extremely offensive in Thai culture.

(Reporting by Sally Mairs)



For comments, or corrections to this article please contact: [email protected]

You can also find Khaosod English on Twitter and Facebook