32.3 C
Bangkok
Monday, May 6, 2024
Home Blog Page 1157

Dolce&Gabbana Fiasco Shows Power of China Market

A 2018 file photo, founders of Dolce&Gabbana Domenico Dolce, left and Stefano Gabbana apologize in a video on Chinese social media, saying "sorry" in Mandarin seen on a computer screen in Beijing, China.

BEIJING — Don’t mess with China and its growing cadre of powerful luxury consumers.

Dolce&Gabbana learned that lesson the hard way when it faced a boycott after Chinese expressed outrage over what were seen as culturally insensitive videos promoting a major runway show in Shanghai and subsequent posts of insulting comments in a private Instagram chat.

The company blamed hackers for the anti-Chinese insults, but the explanation felt flat to many and the damage was done. The Milan designers canceled the Shanghai runway show, meant as a tribute to China, as their guest list of Asian celebrities quickly joined the protests.

Then, as retailers pulled their merchandise from shelves and powerful e-commerce sites deleted their wares, co-founders Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana went on camera — dwarfed against the larger backdrop of an ornate red wall-covering — to apologize to the Chinese people.

“We will never forget this experience, and it will definitely never happen again,” a solemn-looking Gabbana said in a video statement posted Friday on social media.

The apology video, and the sharp public backlash that demanded it, shows the importance of the Chinese market and the risks of operating in it. More broadly, it highlights the huge and still-growing influence of China, a country that cannot be ignored as it expands economically, militarily and diplomatically.

These trends are intertwined in frequent outbursts of nationalist sentiment among consumers who feel slighted by foreign brands or their governments. It’s not the first time a company has apologized, and it surely won’t be the last. Mercedes-Benz did so in February for featuring a quote by the Dalai Lama on its Instagram account.

For Dolce&Gabbana, it could be mark the end of its growth in China, a crucial market for global luxury brands that it has cultivated since opening its first store in 2005 and where it now has 44 boutiques.

“I think it is going to be impossible over the next couple of years for them to work in China,” said Cary Cooper, a professor of organizational psychology and health at Manchester University in England. “When you break this kind of cultural codes, then you are in trouble. The brand is now damaged in China, and I think it will be damaged in China until there is lost memory about it.”

That could shake Dolce&Gabbana’s financial health. The privately held company does not release its individual sales figures. But Chinese consumers are responsible for a third of all luxury spending around the globe, according to a recent study by Bain consultancy. That will grow to 46 percent of forecast sales of an estimated 365 billion euros ($412 billion) by 2025, fueled by millennials and the younger Generation Z set, who will make a growing percentage of their purchases online.

“Without China, the hinterland for growth, D&G will obviously be in a weak competitive position and in danger of being eliminated,” the Chinese business magazine New Fortune said in a social media post Sunday. “This is one of the major reasons why D&G finally lowered its head. They really cannot survive without the Chinese market.”

While Dolce&Gabbana has displayed a knack for social media engagement, inviting millennial influencers with millions of collective followers to sit in their front rows or walk in their shows, that engagement has been a double-edged sword. Pop idol Karry Wang, who has drawn hundreds of screaming Chinese fans to the designer’s Milan showroom for season runway shows, was one of the first to disavow the brand, saying he was ending his role as Asia-Pacific brand ambassador.

Dolce found himself on the defensive several years ago after Elton John lashed out for comments that suggested he did not support gay couples using surrogate mothers to have children. At the time, more than 67,000 tweets urged #boycottdolcegabbana, while Courtney Love vowed to burn her Dolce&Gabbana garb and Martina Navratilova pledged to trash her D&G shirts.

Gabbana, who has 1.6 million Instagram followers, faced a more contained backlash earlier this year when he responded to a collage of Selena Gomez photos on Instagram with the comment, “She’s really ugly.”

Celebrities took to social media Wednesday to blast Dolce&Gabbana and said they would boycott the show, which was canceled. By Thursday, the company’s goods had disappeared from major e-commerce websites. The prevailing sentiment was captured by an airport duty-free shop that posted a photo of its shelves emptied of D&G products: “We have to show our stance. We are proud to be Chinese.”

The rapid escalation into a public relations disaster was fueled by social media. Individuals posted videos of themselves cutting up or burning their Dolce&Gabbana clothes, or picking them up with chopsticks and putting them in the trash. A parody of the offending Dolce&Gabbana videos, which featured a Chinese woman using chopsticks to eat pizza and an oversized cannoli, shows a white man trying to eat Chinese food with a fork and knife. At least three rap bands took up the cause with new songs.

“Companies that don’t respect us don’t deserve our respect,” Wang Zixin, team leader of CD Rev, a nationalist rap band, said by phone from Chengdu, the capital of Sichuan province. Its new song had been viewed more than 850,000 times on Weibo.

“We hope people will remember companies that have ever insulted China, and not forget about them when the fallout passes,” Wang said.

That sense of pride reflects a nationalism that has been encouraged by the government, often in disputes China has with other countries over other foreign products.

Sales by Japanese automakers plunged in 2012 amid tensions between islands both countries claim in the East China Sea. The clash also illustrated the complexity of Chinese sentiment: Industry analysts said buyers didn’t want to be seen in Japanese auto showrooms but went ahead with planned purchases once tensions had passed.

More recently, several foreign companies ran afoul of Beijing’s insistence that they explicitly refer to Taiwan, a self-governing territory, as part of China. Many complied, showing how important the Chinese market has become.

Delta, American and other airlines agreed to refer to Taiwan as part of China, and Zara now says “Taiwan, China” on its website after regulators criticized the fashion brand for calling Taiwan a country. Marriott announced it “respects and supports” China’s sovereignty after it was ordered to shut its China website for a week.

Actor Richard Gere, a supporter of the Dalai Lama, has told The Hollywood Reporter that movie studios balk at hiring him for fear of an official or public backlash that might affect ticket sales in China.

It remains unclear whether the D&G mea culpa video will stop the backlash — or if it will have implications for Made-in-Italy at large. The scandal erupted as Italy’s high-end furniture and design companies were making an annual presentation in Shanghai and as Miu Miu, the Prada Group’s little sister line, showed its cruise line in Shanghai.

Italian designers have so far refrained from comment.

Italian commentators mused whether the Dolce&Gabbana protests were truly spontaneous or if there was some level of government control behind them. The government has publicly said the spat had no diplomatic element and would not comment.

“Anywhere in the world, an entrepreneur can make a mistake, use inappropriate language. Usually it is the consumers and the market to decide the seriousness of the offense,” the Milan daily Corriere della Sera wrote in a commentary. “Only in China is one forced to produce a humiliating video with public self-criticism, like in the time of Mao’s revolution. Now China feels powerful and is applying re-education on a global scale.”

Advertisement

Laine Scores 5 Goals, Lifts Winnipeg Past St. Louis 8-4 in NHL

ST. LOUIS, Missouri — Patrik Laine scored five goals Saturday in the Winnipeg Jets’ 8-4 victory at St. Louis, two short of the 97-year-old NHL record.

It was the 61st five-goal game in league history. Darryl Sittler of the Toronto Maple Leafs was the last player to score six goals in a game, on April 22, 1976, against Boston. The last player to score five goals in a game was Johan Franzen of the Detroit Red Wings on Feb. 2, 2011.

Brandon Tanev, Blake Wheeler, and Jack Roslovic also scored for the Jets, who snapped their first two-game losing streak of the season.

Laine’s five goal outburst gives him a league-leading 16 goals in 10 November games.

Joe Malone, who played in the early days of the NHL with the Montreal Canadiens, scored seven goals in a game with the Quebec Bulldogs in January 1920. He also had a six-goal game and three five-goal games.

Laurent Brossoit allowed four goals on 27 shots for his first career win against St. Louis. He improved to 4-1-1.

Chad Johnson allowed six goals on 25 shots and fell to 2-5-0. He was pulled in favor of Jake Allen after allowing his sixth, and Laine’s fourth goal of the game. Allen stopped nine of the 11 shots he faced in relief.

Laine scored his first goal 16:26 into the first period when he buried a feed from Bryan Little just 41 seconds after Wheeler tied the game 1-all with his fourth goal of the season.

Tarasenko tied the game 2-all 1:24 later, when he snapped a 10-game streak without scoring a goal with his seventh tally of the season.

Laine’s second goal came on the power play with Vladimir Tarasenko serving a two-minute penalty for roughing and put Winnipeg up 3-2.

Laine completed his seventh career hat trick and third of November when he beat Johnson 12:53 into the third period.

Blues defenseman Joel Edmundson fought Tyler Myers shortly after Laine’s third goal, but that did nothing to change the tide as Laine netted his fourth goal later in the period.

Laine netted his fifth of the game when he pushed a feed from Little past Allen, becoming the 45th player in NHL history to record a five-goal game.

David Perron, Ryan O’Reilly, and Pat Maroon also scored for the Blues who have not won consecutive games since defeating Carolina and San Jose on Nov. 6 and Nov. 9.

 

Notes

Blues LW Brayden Schenn skated in his 100th game with the team. . Perron scored his first goal in 14 games. .. Jets RW Blake Wheeler skated in his 800th career NHL game. .. Laine’s has scored 13 goals in 11 career games against St. Louis.

 

Up Next

Jets: Host the Pittsburgh Penguins on Tuesday

Blues: At Detroit on Wednesday to start a three-game road trip.

Advertisement

Spain to Back Brexit Deal After UK Agrees to Gibraltar Terms

Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May sits below a painting of the country's first Prime Minister Robert Walpole in 2017 in 10 Downing Street, London. Photo: Christopher Furlong / Associated Press
Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May sits below a painting of the country's first Prime Minister Robert Walpole in 2017 in 10 Downing Street, London. Photo: Christopher Furlong / Associated Press

BRUSSELS — The European Union removed the last major obstacle to sealing an agreement on Brexit after Spain said it had reached a deal Saturday with Britain over Gibraltar on the eve of a summit where EU leaders will sign off on the divorce papers.

British Prime Minister Theresa May, who held preparatory talks with EU leaders Saturday evening, will then have the momentous task of selling the terms of the deal to a recalcitrant British Parliament and a nation still fundamentally split over whether the U.K. should leave the EU on March 29 and under what conditions.

May vowed to campaign “with my heart and soul” to win Parliament’s backing for the deal.”

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, who had threatened to oppose the deal, announced Saturday that Madrid would support the divorce agreement after the U.K. and the EU underscored Spain’s say in the future of the disputed British territory of Gibraltar, which lies at the southern tip of the Mediterranean nation.

Spain wants the future of the tiny territory, which was ceded to Britain in 1713 but is still claimed by Spain, to be a bilateral issue between Madrid and London, not between Britain and the EU.

In a letter obtained by The Associated Press, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and European Council President Donald Tusk assured Sanchez that Spain’s “prior agreement” would be needed on matters concerning Gibraltar.

Spain claimed a major diplomatic victory.

“Europe and the United Kingdom have accepted the conditions imposed by Spain,” Sanchez said. “Therefore, as a consequence of this, Spain will lift its veto and tomorrow will vote in favor of Brexit.”

But Britain said the statement merely clarified the existing state of affairs. May said Britain had conceded nothing on the sovereignty of Gibraltar.

“I will always stand by Gibraltar,” May said. “The U.K. position on the sovereignty of Gibraltar has not changed and will not change.”

The move should allow EU leaders speedily to sign off on the Brexit agreement at a special summit Sunday morning.

May hopes to leave EU headquarters on Sunday with a legally binding agreement on the withdrawal terms for Britain’s departure from the EU on March 29, as well as an ambitious but vague political declaration on future relations between the two sides.

Winning warm greetings from her 27 fellow leaders on Sunday will likely be easier for May than getting friendly treatment from her colleagues in government and Parliament once she returns. The British leader is under intense pressure from pro-Brexit and pro-EU British lawmakers, with large numbers on both sides of the debate opposing the divorce deal and threatening to vote it down when it comes to Parliament next month.

Brexiteers think it will leave the U.K. tied too closely to EU rules, while pro-Europeans say it will erect new barriers between Britain and the bloc – its neighbor and biggest trading partner.

The leader of Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party, on which May relies to get her government majority, on Saturday reinforced her party’s rejection of the Brexit deal. The DUP opposes plans for keeping the border between Northern Ireland and EU member Ireland open after Brexit, saying it weakens the ties binding the U.K. by creating separate trade rules for Northern Ireland.

Arlene Foster said in Belfast that the agreement leaves Northern Ireland “open to the perils of increased divergence away from the rest of the United Kingdom.”

The DUP has said it may drop its backing of the government because of the Brexit plan.

May insists her deal delivers the on the things that matter most to pro-Brexit voters –control of budgets, immigration policy and laws – while retaining close ties to the U.K.’s European neighbors.

She plans to spend the next couple of weeks selling it to politicians and the British public before Parliament’s vote in December.

In a “letter to the nation” before Sunday’s summit, May said she would be “campaigning with my heart and soul to win that vote and to deliver this Brexit deal, for the good of our United Kingdom and all of our people.”

She said Britain’s departure from the EU “must mark the point when we put aside the labels of ‘Leave’ and ‘Remain’ for good and we come together again as one people.”

“To do that we need to get on with Brexit now by getting behind this deal.”

Story: Raf Cassert, Jill Lawless, Joseph Wilson

Advertisement

Opinion: Women in Politics, Good Looks and Distractions

Former Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra waves to supporters as she arrives in 2017 to the Supreme Court to make her final statements in a trial on a charge of criminal negligence. Photo: Sakchai Lalit / Associated Press
Former Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra waves to supporters as she arrives in 2017 to the Supreme Court to make her final statements in a trial on a charge of criminal negligence. Photo: Sakchai Lalit / Associated Press

Re•tention: Pravit Rojanaphruk

To some men, having women in politics is unfortunately often still about good looks. It’s a distraction to many of these males. Think of the recent wave of adoration surrounding Jinny Yotsuda Leelapanyalert, the “cute” 19-year-old daughter of Pheu Thai de facto partly leader Sudarat Kaeyuraphan.

Local Thai-language and social media were enchanted by Suradat’s daughter who accompanied her mother to campaign for elections.

Many of these men would say Sudarat herself is rather “pleasant looking” and it seems that for them, this is a key additional prerequisite for women politicians.

Think of Future Forward Party’s spokesperson Pannika Wanich, another politician noted by some men for her looks despite her London School of Economics education. On the other side of the political spectrum, we have Watanya Wongopasi, or “Madame Dear,” former manager of Under-23 Thai national football squad joining pro-junta Palang Pracharat Party on Nov. 16. The 33-year-old rookie politician had become a media obsession prior to entering politics due to her looks.

Unfortunately, beauty could be distracting, particularly in politics. Instead of seeing these politicians for their ideologies, abilities – or the lack there of – people, particularly many male voters, end up liking or disliking women politicians based on their looks.

According to a recent meeting held by UN-Women and its partners including the European Union and the Embassy of Finland, the percentage of women in Thailand’s junta-appointed parliament as of January 2017 was among the lowest in Southeast Asia at 5 percent. That’s only 12 out of 247 seats. In Finland it’s 42 percent, while in Sweden it’s almost 44 percent.

So Thailand has a problem of not just a low number of women in politics but also a misplaced focus on the few women in politics.

There are other challenges too. I spoke to Arja Alho, a former cabinet minister at the Finnish Finance Ministry and she said even in Finland – where 42 percent of parliamentarians and half of cabinet members are women – being women politicians requires support and understanding from your family.

But that’s not all.

“There is an expectation that women should be more moral, not corrupt and honest. You should not be drinking too much… The expectation is that I should be more modest,” 64-year-old Alho said.

Alho first entered politics at 28 and observed that while old male politicians are often described as “decisive leaders”, it often became “wicked old woman” when it came to old Finnish female politician.

While the male gender is invisible in politics, being a woman comes with a lot of baggage and expectations. This make it extra difficult for women to succeed in politics without relying on good looks.

Think of fugitive former Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra. It’s also her good looks that attract many male voters to her – not just the fact that she is seen as a mere proxy of Thaksin Shinawatra – another ousted and fugitive former premier.

Yingluck has been called names, such as “traitor whore,” or karee khaichart, or “stupid bitch,” or e-ngo, and all the sexist remarks. It’s hard to imagine if a loathed male politician could have been described in a worse manner.

These specific challenges will persist as long as members of Thai society – male, female and LGBT – do not seriously contemplate, rectify and find a solution.

With the upcoming promised elections being mostly about whether you are pro or anti-junta and the economy, the issue of women in politics is once again nowhere to be seen.

Advertisement

Red Curry, Thai Omelette Among Oldest Thai Food: Expert

Old unidentified temple murals dating to the Ayutthaya period show how Siamese monks and lay people eat.
Old unidentified temple murals dating to the Ayutthaya period show how Siamese monks and lay people eat.

BANGKOK — Chicken red curry, crispy Thai omelette and chilli paste are three of the centuries-old recorded Thai dishes still common today, an expert said Thursday.

The three were listed among a dozen meals offered to Buddhist monks at the Temple of the Emerald Buddha, or Wat Phra Kaew, in 1809 in Bangkok during the reign of King Rama I, according to retired folklore professor Sukanya Sujachaya.

Now, they’re on a new list of dishes the Culture Ministry hopes to register as cultural heritage with UNESCO.

Little or no written record about Thai dishes existed during the Ayutthaya period, Sukanya – who is researching food history for the ministry – said during the talk at Matichon Academy. She believes this is because food was so abundant back then that people didn’t bother paying attention, leaving foreigners to make the records. Some of them concluded that the Siamese were lazy because they didn’t have to work hard to fill their stomachs.

Another Western account also noted a spike in the popularity of alcohol consumption from 1620 to 1628 during the reign of King Songtham of Ayutthaya, credited to his prodigious drinking.

Old murals and foreign chronicles show people ate communally, but with women and men segregated by gender and class.

Another discovery was that sweets were not so sweet during the Ayutthaya period – at least not until sugar cane plantations became common much later.

Sukanya – who is writing a book on ancient Thai dishes for the Culture Ministry – said fish sauce, or nam plaa, as we now know it existed during the Ayutthaya period. However she said it came from China, as the Siamese had previously fermented freshwater fish and not saltwater fish.

Other world-famous Thai dishes such as tom yum goong are shrouded in mystery, as there aren’t early written records about their provenance, although Sukanya believes the soup probably existed since the Ayutthaya period because freshwater prawn is common in the river.

Old unidentified temple murals dating to the Ayutthaya period show how Siamese monks and lay people eat.
Old unidentified temple murals dating to the Ayutthaya period show how Siamese monks and lay people eat.

“Prawns were common so the dish most likely existed back then,” Sukanya said, referring to the period that lasted from 1351 to 1767. Records from King Rama I’s period also contain a dish described as boiled prawn.

Another dish on the list still eaten in a similar way today is fried fish and watermelon. Today however, the dried fish is shredded, whilst previously it was eaten whole.

As for the use of forks and spoons, Sukanya credited King Chulalongkorn, or Rama V, for the selective adoption of western cutlery – namely smaller forks and spoons that suited Thai dishes instead of larger forks and knives, as meat is mostly cut into smaller pieces before being served. This replaced the use of hands to pick up food and scoop rice – which is common in South and Southeast Asia.

“It was chosen from the many pieces of Western cutlery. It’s very convenient to eat with forks and spoons as one can sturdily press food down with them.”

Another notable eating habit – long before one-plate meals became common – is that Thais used to eat rice with a few side dishes that came together, instead of the western tradition of serving dishes one at a time. Again, this is depicted in old temple murals dated back to the Ayutthaya period.

Although food was not really mentioned in detail in Ayutthaya period literature, a wind of change came after the kingdom’s fall, as famine struck the old capital when it was sacked and burned down by the Burmese.

Sukanya said King Taksin of Thonburi Kingdom – which succeeded Ayutthaya – had to import rice from China for seven years after the incident. Since, literature touched on food which was once abundant – at least for a period of time – before people became obsessed about it given its scarcity.

Advertisement

Prayuth’s Berlin Trip Rescheduled to Tuesday

Junta chairman Prayuth Chan-ocha poses for a picture at a mosque in Bangkok on Wednesday. Image: Government House

BANGKOK — Junta chairman Prayuth Chan-ocha is slated to visit Germany from Tuesday to Thursday, government officials confirmed.

Gen. Prayuth was originally scheduled to meet Chancellor Angela Merkel at the end of October, but the government postponed it at the last minute. The two leaders are set to discuss partnerships in industry, technology and education, officials said.

The pair met briefly on Oct. 19 at a Thai-Asian summit in Brussels.

Prayuth will also attend the Thai-German Business Forum and meet with representatives of Thai communities in Germany during his three-day trip.

Correction: A previous version of this article said Prayuth was to visit Germany starting Monday. In fact, he started the trip on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Drunken Knife Brawl Between Monks Leaves Both Bloodied

Rescue workers apply first aid to Phra Chuchart Boonloh.

ANG THONG — Two monks were sent to hospital after an alcohol-fueled knife fight broke out late Friday night, police said.

Phra Wannop Roengjai, 52, and Phra Chuchart Boonloh, 43, both suffered knife wounds from the altercation between them at Wat Amphawan in Ang Thong province.

According to police, Phra Chuchart said he and his senior monk were drinking liquor together inside temple grounds Friday when he complained to Wannop for not allowing monks to accept invitations to perform ceremonies outside the temple.

The conversation soon turned heated and the pair started brawling, Chuchart told police. He also claimed that Wannop drew out a knife and slashed at him, so he seized the weapon and stabbed him in return.

Police said they would interrogate both monks after they recover.

Advertisement

King Opens Cycling Track at BKK Airport (Photos)

His Majesty the King cycles at Happy and Healthy Bike Lane.

BANGKOK — His Majesty the King on Friday inaugurated and cycled on a track at Suvarnabhumi Airport.

The cycling track, officially called the Happy and Healthy Bike Lane in English, loops around the airport in Samut Prakan province. King Vajiralongkorn presided over its opening ceremony at about 5pm.

He then biked on the entire 23.5-kilometer track, accompanied by an entourage of 450 representatives and officials.

The track consists of a blue lane for casual bikers and a purple one for professional cyclists. It’s open to the public 6am to 9pm daily. Entry is free.

Related stories:

King to Rehearse Big Ride Friday at BKK Airport

56 2
His Majesty the King cycles at Happy and Healthy Bike Lane.
46498136 1087171248131307 334729285531074560 o
His Majesty the King cycles at Happy and Healthy Bike Lane.
46510921 1087171254797973 4802494617771573248 o
His Majesty the King plants a tree to inaugurate Happy and Healthy Bike Lane.
S 9699371
His Majesty the King cycles at Happy and Healthy Bike Lane.
2DB28733 950A 4205 B49F FE7E85FAF529
His Majesty the King cycles at Happy and Healthy Bike Lane.
Advertisement

S&P 500 Slides Into ‘Correction’ for Second Time This Year

Trader Gregory Rowe works Nov. 7 on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Photo: Richard Drew / Associated Press
Trader Gregory Rowe works Nov. 7 on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Photo: Richard Drew / Associated Press

United States stocks closed lower after a shortened session Friday, bumping the benchmark S&P 500 index into a correction, or drop of 10 percent below its most recent all-time high in September.

Energy companies led the market slide as the price of U.S. crude oil tumbled to its lowest level in more than a year, reflecting worries among traders that a slowing global economy could hurt demand for oil.

“Oil is really falling sharply, continuing its downward descent, and that appears to be giving investors a lot of concern that there’s slowing global growth,” said Jeff Kravetz, regional investment director at U.S. Bank Private Wealth Management. “You have that, and then you have the recent sell-off in tech and in retail, and then throw on there trade tensions and rising rates.”

Losses in technology and internet companies and banks outweighed gains in health care and household goods stocks. Several big retailers declined as investors monitored Black Friday for signs of a strong holiday shopping season.

Trading volume was lighter than usual with the markets open for only a half day after the Thanksgiving holiday.

The S&P 500 index fell 17.37 points, or 0.7 percent, to 2,632.56. The index is now down 10.2 percent from its last all-time high set Sept. 20. The last time the index entered a correction was in February.

The latest correction comes as investors worry that corporate profits, a key driver of stock market gains, could weaken next year.

“The market is re-pricing and trying to assess where we’re going to be in the early part of 2019,” said Quincy Krosby, chief market strategist at Prudential Financial.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 178.74 points, or 0.7 percent, to 24,285.95. The Nasdaq composite dropped 33.27 points, or 0.5 percent, to 6,938.98. The Russell 2000 index of smaller-company stocks picked up 0.40 points, or 0.03 percent, to 1,488.68.

Crude oil prices fell for the seventh straight week on worries that a slowing global economy could hurt demand even as oil production has been increasing.

The benchmark U.S. crude contract slid 7.7 percent to settle at USD$50.42 per barrel in New York. That is the lowest since October 2017. Brent crude, the international standard, lost 6.1 percent to close at $58.80 per barrel in London.

Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members have recently signaled a willingness to consider production cuts at the oil cartel’s meeting next month. The U.S. has been increasing pressure on Saudi Arabia and OPEC to not cut production, however, a move which could push prices down further.

The slide in oil prices weighed on energy stocks. Concho Resources, a developer and explorer of oil and natural gas properties, slumped 6.3 percent to $126.96.

Tesla fell 3.7 percent to $325.83 after the electric auto maker said it intends to cut prices for its Model X and Model S cars in China to make them more affordable.

Traders had their eye on retailers as Black Friday, the traditional start to the crucial holiday shopping season, began. Shares in L Brands, operator of Victoria’s Secret and Bath & Body Works, added 2 percent to $29.97. Other retailers put investors in a selling mood. Kohl’s fell 3.7 percent to $63.83, while Target lost 2.8 percent to $67.35. Macy’s dropped 1.8 percent to $32.01.

Rockwell Collins climbed 9.2 percent to $141.63 after Chinese regulators conditionally approved the sale of the maker of communications and aviation electronics systems to United Technologies Corp.

Investors will be watching next week when Presidents Xi Jinping and Trump meet at the Group of 20 summit in Argentina for signs that the two leaders can find common ground to begin unwinding the spiraling trade dispute.

The dispute between the U.S. and China has weighed on the market, stoking traders’ worries that billions in escalating tariffs imposed by both countries on each other’s goods will hurt corporate earnings at a time when the global economy appears to be slowing.

“If you can get President Trump and President Xi to even just come closer with their rhetoric and make a bit of progress on the trade front that could be the catalyst for markets to move higher,” Kravetz said.

It may take more than a meeting to work out deep-seated issues between Washington and Beijing, which resumed talks over their trade dispute earlier this month. According to The Wall Street Journal, the U.S. has asked its allies to stop using telecommunications equipment from Huawei, which is Chinese-owned. The report cited people familiar with the matter.

Bond prices fell Friday. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note rose to 3.05 percent from 3.04 percent late Wednesday.

The dollar fell to 112.88 yen from 112.97 yen late Thursday. The euro weakened to $1.1330 from $1.1406. The pound eased to $1.2810 from $1.2876.

Gold declined 0.4 percent to $1,223.20 an ounce. Silver dropped 1.8 percent to $14.24 an ounce. Copper slid 1 percent to $2.77 a pound.

In other commodities trading, wholesale gasoline plunged 7.9 percent to $1.39 a gallon. Heating oil lost 4.8 percent to $1.88 a gallon. Natural gas fell 3.2 percent to $4.31 per 1,000 cubic feet.

Major indexes in Europe finished mostly higher after shaking off an early slide.

Traders were weighing the latest developments in the negotiations for Britain’s exit from the European Union. Both sides were finalizing the terms of the divorce Friday and expected to sign off on the deal Sunday, though it’s unclear whether the British parliament will pass the deal.

The FTSE 100 index of leading British shares slipped 0.1 percent. Germany’s DAX index rose 0.5 percent, while France’s CAC 40 gained 0.2 percent.

Earlier in Asia, South Korea’s Kospi shed 0.6 percent and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index dropped 0.4 percent. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 bucked the trend, gaining 0.4 percent. Shares fell in Taiwan and rose in Singapore, Thailand and Indonesia. Japanese markets were closed for a holiday.

Story: Alex Veiga

Advertisement

Thai Law: Demystifying the New Property Tax Code

Come Jan. 1, 2020, 25 long and delicate years of work by 13 governments to bridge the economic divide of the Thai population will hit the books.

For the first time ever in Thai legal history, those with deep pockets will be forced to pay any tax on their houses at all. It will drive a redistribution of land, as those hoarding large, undeveloped tracts will face a powerful incentive to divest.

wirot.3Commercial, residential, vacant and agricultural lands are the four types of taxable land and buildings that the new property tax law covers.

All in all, low- to middle-income people should not be affected much by the new law, which aims to increase revenues for local administrative organizations such as municipalities and sub-district government bodies by way of “taking money from the rich and distributing it to the poor.”

This is extra money from local land to fund the running of the villages to be extracted from ultra-wealth, although cynics are skeptical as to how much money from the low-tax rates and generous exemptions will actually be added to the village coffers, vis-a-vis traditional budget support from the central government.

Many see the push for historic wealth redistribution in the law – which comes just a few months before a general election – as an achievable, low-key starting point. Criticism has been aired over reduced tax ceilings, benefits of tax exemptions and great compromises for the rich.

Nevertheless, the law is historic, the first wealth redistribution law aimed directly at property holdings. Here are the highlights.

Commercial Property: 0.3% on Appraised Value

When the Act on Land and Building Tax comes into effect 13 months from now, it will replace the current 12.5 percent house and land tax with a 0.3 percent property tax on land and buildings used for commercial purposes. Looking at the percentages alone is misleading as they are each calculated on a different basis.

Today’s 12.5 percent rate is calculated from the annual rent a property could earn, while the upcoming 0.3 percent rate will be based on the property’s appraised value by the Treasury Department. That means every situation will be different, and owners will have to find out on a case-by-case basis if their tax burden will increase or decrease.

Someone with a 10 million-baht shophouse that rents out for 15,000 baht per month (180,000 baht annually) now pays 22,500 baht under the 12.5 percent rate. Their annual assessment will increase significantly to 30,000 baht, or 0.3 percent of the appraised value.

But if the property’s value is 5 million baht and also rented out at 15,000 baht per month, you’ll pay less under the new law – 15,000 baht.

Your condominium units for rent will be subject to a similar calculation.

An interim provision of the new property tax law already anticipates the possibility of an increased tax burden. It allows the taxpayer to pay the same amount they paid the year prior to the effective date of the new tax for each of the first three years, provided that the additional balance is fully repaid over the following three years.

The 0.3 percent rate applies to commercial land and structures with a total value of up to 50 million baht. The progressive rate gradually goes up to the highest rung at 0.7 percent for property worth over 5 billion baht. These applicable rates are expressed as temporary rates for the first two years of the new tax commencing in 2020.

Thereafter, new rates will be announced by the Finance Ministry, which administers the law, in a royal decree, an implementing regulation to be issued after the new law is in place. The maximum rate specified in the new law that royal decrees can go up to for commercial land is 1.2 percent.

The Legislation Process

The passage of the law on Friday, Nov. 16, 2018, by the National Legislative Assembly, or NLA, was surprising given that the first reading which approved it in principle was early last year. The second reading that considered the bill article-by-article was concluded Thursday, and the final reading, a binary vote of yes or no, one day later on Friday.

The next step is for the prime minister to go through a waiting period of 25 days under the Constitution before he signs the bill and presents it to His Majesty the King for the royal countersignature. The Constitution prescribes another 90 days for his Majesty to consider and execute the bill. An executed bill from the palace will be announced and published in the Royal Gazette, completing the process for the bill to become law.

In spite of the ample time permitted by the Constitution for the new law to be further processed, it is expected that this new property tax law will be published and have the force of law by the end this year or early next year, leaving the actual tax collection to start on Jan. 1, 2020. In the meantime, the old 12.5 percent land and house tax and the very cheap land development tax will continue to apply.

Never Before Have Wealthy Landlords Paid Taxes on Their Houses

Residential land and buildings are where the rich fully benefit. Individuals who own a parcel of land and house worth 50 million baht (USD$1.5 million) as their primary residence with their name shown in the household registration book are entirely exempt from tax.

For the first two years the new tax is enforced beginning in 2020, properties worth over 50 million baht are subject to applicable tax rates of 0.03 percent to 0.1 percent; the upper end of that range belongs to land and houses, condo included, worth over 100 million baht. Rates applicable after the first two years will be announced by royal decrees to be promulgated after the law is enacted. In addition to the initial two-year rates, the law itself specifies the low legal limit of 0.3 percent for residences, which future royal decrees of applicable rates cannot exceed.

50 Million is the Magic Number

Generally speaking, the wealthier you are with land past the 50 million baht mark, the higher property tax you need to pay – up to 0.3 percent. It’s the first-time ever in Thai legal history that those with deep pockets are forced to pay any tax on their houses at all.

The poor and middle class, whose properties are valued at far less, will be unaffected.

The 50 million-baht threshold finally survived an initial scare, as critics thought it was too high and wanted to bring it down to 25 million baht – by Thai standards the lesser amount still being beyond the reach of the middle class. In the end, the 50 million baht of the original draft stands. Yes, for a fluid transition to a new tax regime, some appeasement may be necessary.

For those foreigners who own homes that are located on rental tracts of land, the tax-free threshold is lower, at 10 million baht. Value beyond that starts paying taxes starting at 0.02 percent. No legal entity owners enjoy this benefit.

A mixed-use, commercial/residential property will be charged taxes at proportion to the areas used for different purposes.

Agricultural Land, Friendly Rates

As with residential land, agricultural land is tax free for the first 50 million baht of the official assessed value for land owned by individuals; legal-entity landowners are not so lucky. The high threshold means a significant number of well-to-do businessmen will be classified as farmers protected by the country, which takes pride in its agricultural roots. It is amusing to see how the nation’s agricultural background was cited in debates to keep the threshold for tax exemption at this current level.

Among the four types of taxable property, farmland attracts the lowest rate. The low-end of the scale for the first two years will begin at 0.01 percent for agricultural land worth up to 75 million baht, graduating to the highest applicable rate of the range at 0.1 percent for land valued at over 1 billion baht, while the legal limit written in stone in the act is fixed at a comfortable level of 0.15 percent.

And if the property owners are individuals, there is a generous grace period of three years counting from 2020 during which they don’t have to pay tax.

There is no such grace period for owners who are legal entities.

Vacant Land: Point of Attack

It’s time to do something with those overgrown, vacant lots that are a nuisance to your neighbors or vast holdings that serve no purpose in Suphan Buri

Undeveloped land is the lightning rod that draws the highest property taxes and the largest target of the new law. Land bank accumulation, a hobby of Thai millionaires for generations, has been discouraged since the outset of this legislative effort. It’s the type of land the most compromise was made to smooth out opposition from land accumulators. The originally planned 5 percent ceiling was lowered drastically to 3 percent.

What happens to undeveloped land under the new legislation will no doubt serve as a catalyst for land redistribution, the chief purpose of the law. The waiting period of one year in 2019 will inevitably see more vacant land offloaded to the market to escape the wrath of the 2020 vacant land tax, which will increase as the years go by.

True, the law stipulates the ceiling of the vacant land tax at 1.2 percent, but this is only temporary. The applicable rates for the first two years of the new tax collection range from 0.3 percent for the initial notch of 50 million baht – there are no exemptions here. The applicable rates rise step-by-step to 0.7 percent applied to a land worth over 5 billion baht, with the regulatory ceiling at 1.2 percent. The vacant land has simply mirrored the tax treatment of commercial land.

However, if the vacant land remains undeveloped for three years in a row, the applicable rate will creep up by another 0.3 percent in year four. An additional 0.3 percent kicks in every three years until the total vacant land tax hits the absolute limit of 3 percent.

Wealthy Thais sitting on vast swathes of vacant land can no longer have peace of mind: Either you must divest or wait until the law is revised by future elected governments, which may be inclined to ignore the small voting pool of tycoons in favor of the deep ballot trough presented by the grass roots and slap on even higher taxes.

It won’t be less, it’ll be more. The floodgates have been opened.

Wirot Poonsuwan is Senior Counsel and Head of Special Projects at Blumenthal Richter & Sumet in Bangkok and can be reached at [email protected].

Advertisement

LATEST NEWS

Bangkok
overcast clouds
32.3 ° C
33.8 °
31.6 °
69 %
5.8kmh
93 %
Sun
32 °
Mon
38 °
Tue
37 °
Wed
36 °
Thu
34 °