Four political activists charged with violating the junta's ban on protest were brought on March 15, 2015 to the military court in Bangkok.
BANGKOK — Civilians will no longer be tried by the military after the junta Monday revoked orders passed since it seized power over two years ago.
The order, issued under the junta leader’s absolute power granted by its interim charter, said civilians tried for cases involving national security will no longer go to military courts. The order, which went into immediate effect, is not retroactive and does not affect cases already underway.
The rationale given for the change was that conditions in the country have improved. After a junta-backed constitution was passed by voters in August, the junta said it sees public cooperation with its reform campaign.
“As we saw, the referendum went well and the draft constitution of Thailand won overwhelming approval from people,” read the order. “Therefore, all measures should be eased so every party can exercise their rights and duties as well as will be protected under the provisions of the new constitution that will be officially come into effect soon.”
When it seized power in 2014, the junta issued orders requiring military trials for cases involving the use of explosives, suspected royal defamation and anything deemed a threat to national security.
Activists have accused the military government of abusing these powers by using them to seize and detain its critics for political purposes.
Monday’s order does not revoke the military’s power to arrest, search and detain suspects in such cases for up to seven days.
The order said Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha may consider changing those provisions at a later time.
BANGKOK — Texan one-man band My Empty Phantom will fly from the Lone Star State to Bangkok, where he will simultaneously play an array of instruments including the drums, the piano and the guitar whilst recording the sounds with the help of a loop pedal.
The result will culminate in a live show of experimental post-rock fused with hints of ambient music.
Local ambient sound artists17September1981and Plern Pan Perth aka Thanart Rasanont will perform an opening act on stage.
My Empty Phantom is a solo project by Jesse Beaman from Austin, Texas, who has been on tours in an array of countries, including France, Portugal, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Bulgaria and Mexico amongst others.
The ticket is 200 baht and includes one drink. My Empty Phantom Live In Bangkok starts at 7pm on Saturday at Brownstone Studios and Ageha Cafe. The studio-gallery-cafe building is located on Soi Sukhumvit 77 near Soi On Nut 25, and can be reached by motorbike from BTS On Nut.
Guests at Beam, a popular electronic dance music club in Bangkok’s Thonglor area, present urine to narcotics officers early Sunday morning.
BANGKOK — Soldiers raided and shut down three downtown nightclubs early Sunday morning.
Beam, a high-end dance club in Thonglor’s 72 Courtyard had more than 100 guests inside when it was stormed by soldiers and narcotics officers at 3am. Officers also raided two Soi Sukhumvit 11 venues: Climax in the basement of the Ambassador Hotel and the nearby Daawat Restaurant & Night Club.
Both Thai and foreign guests were asked to show identification and were tested for drugs. Officers said they did not find anyone testing positive for drugs or any underage drinking.
Forty hookahs and 2.5 kilograms of tobacco were confiscated from the Indian-style restaurant Daawat.
Col. Noppasit Sitthiphongsophon, who led the raid, said they had received complaints the clubs were open after 2am. He said the operators of all three clubs failed to present their licenses when asked.
Noppasit said he would hand the cases over for police to pursue further.
Since the military came to power in May 2014, it has brought Bangkok’s once free-wheeling nightlife to heel by more widely enforcing what were once negotiable closing times.
Under junta order No. 22 issued in July 2015, officers have the power to revoke the license of a club for five years if it is open past legal closing time.
Military raid and shut down Climax, a nightclub in Bangkok’s Soi Sukhumvit 11 early Sunday morning.
Leicester's team manager Claudio Ranieri and player Wes Morgan lift the trophy as Leicester City celebrate becoming the English Premier League soccer champions last May at the King Power stadium in Leicester, England. Photo: Matt Dunham / Associated Press
LEICESTER, England — The closest Leicester got to a European trip in recent years was crossing the Welsh border to play Swansea in the Premier League.
Now, as the unlikely English champions, they’ll be visiting Belgium, Portugal and Denmark – and if all goes well, even more countries – for matches in their first-ever campaign in the Champions League.
Leicester is one of two newcomers in Europe’s elite club competition this season, along with Rostov following its second-place finish in the Russian league.
Both teams were fighting relegation in their respective domestic leagues just two seasons ago, yet now they are mixing it with the cream of the continent.
In its 132-year history, Leicester has only had four seasons of European competition – the last coming in 2000 in the now-defunct UEFA Cup after winning the English League Cup. That was Leicester’s last piece of major silverware before shocking the sporting world by winning the Premier League last season.
The intervening 16-year period was a bumpy ride for the central English club, which bobbed up and down between England’s top two divisions – and even spent a season in the third tier in 2008-09 – and also drifted close to financial ruin before being taken over by a Thai consortium in 2010.
The team, known as the Foxes, returned to the Premier League in 2014 and two years later they are the champions, completing the ultimate fairy tale journey.
There’s been something of a championship-winning hangover at Leicester, though, and the Champions League campaign, which starts at Club Brugge on Wednesday, will offer some respite after a sobering start to the Premier League title defense.
Having lost just three league games last season, Claudio Ranieri’s team has lost two of its opening four matches this season and the manner of the defeats will be a concern.
An opening-day 2-1 loss at promoted Hull and Saturday’s 4-1 loss at Liverpool highlighted how much the team is missing N’Golo Kante, the France midfielder sold to Chelsea in the offseason. Often it felt like Kante covered the ground of two players last season, offering excellent protection to a defense containing journeymen and even cast-offs.
With Kante gone, Leicester’s solidity has disappeared and the side looks open. Liverpool could easily have scored more than four goals at Anfield.
“We have to clear our minds,” Ranieri said, “and understand that in football we have to be strong, determined, aggressive and reactive.”
It’s not all doom and gloom for Leicester, however.
The club ended up being one of English football’s biggest spenders in the summer transfer window, breaking its transfer record twice to sign strikers Ahmed Musa, then Islam Slimani. The squad is now much deeper and stronger, while Ranieri managed to limit the major outgoings to just Kante, meaning key players Jamie Vardy and Riyad Mahrez are still on board.
In a sense, the pressure is off Leicester this season and it should just enjoy the Champions League campaign, especially considering its benign draw that will see the team also play FC Copenhagen and FC Porto. A couple of wins at its King Power stadium fortress and a place in the knockout stage could beckon.
“Once again, I say we are underdogs,” said Ranieri, who is embarking on a sixth Champions League campaign with a sixth different club.
U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton waves as she walks from her daughter's apartment building Sunday in New York. Photo: Craig Ruttle / Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton’s stumbles as she left Sunday’s 9/11 memorial ceremony put her health at the forefront of a presidential campaign in which the two major party nominees are among the oldest ever and have disclosed a limited amount of information about their medical history.
The Democratic presidential nominee “felt overheated” and left the ground zero ceremony after about 90 minutes, her campaign said. A video of her departure show Clinton appearing to stumble as three staff members hold her up and help her into a van.
While the former secretary of state later emerged from her daughter’s nearby apartment, saying she was “feeling great,” the episode focused attention on Clinton’s health with eight weeks remaining in a contentious election in which Republican rival Donald Trump has sought to sow doubt about her health and fitness to serve.
Trump has repeatedly questioned Clinton’s health, telling supporters last month she “lacks the mental and physical stamina” to serve as president and fight Islamic State militants. The billionaire businessman also attended Sunday’s memorial, and said “I don’t know anything” when asked about Clinton.
It’s an accusation that Clinton has sought to play off as a “wacky strategy” from Trump and evidence that he embraces an “alternative reality.” She poked fun of the idea during an appearance on ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live” last month, jokingly opening a pickle jar as proof of her vigor.
Despite the intense focus on the Clinton’s falling ill on Sunday, Arthur Caplan, a bioethicist at New York University Langone Medical Center, said the moment told voters little about Clinton’s physical fitness.
“There are plenty of people who may stumble around on a hot humid day for lots of reasons,” Caplan said. “Without examining, without having the history … you don’t have a basis to say anything.”
In 2008, Republican nominee John McCain made public more than a thousand pages of his medical history to show he was cancer-free and fit to serve as president at age 71. Neither Clinton or Trump have released anything approaching that level of detail.
Dr. Lisa Bardack, an internist who has been Clinton’s personal doctor since 2001, released a two-page letter in July 2015 that said Clinton was in “excellent physical condition and fit to serve as president of the United States.”
Trump’s gastroenterologist, Dr. Harold Bornstein, wrote a four-paragraph letter claiming Trump would be “the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.” He later told NBC News it took him just five minutes to write it.
While Clinton has released more information than Trump, Caplan said neither candidate has offered voters a sufficient record. He said that ideally, presidential nominees should allow an independent panel to assess their health.
“Since we can’t get that done for taxes, I don’t think we’re going to get it done for health,” he said, referencing Trump’s refusal to match Clinton’s release of her personal tax records.
At 69, Ronald Reagan was the oldest person to be elected president when he won in 1980. Trump turned 70 in June, whileClinton will have just turned 69 if she wins the White House.
But aging researcher S. Jay Olshansky, of the University of Illinois at Chicago, said Sunday that age alone shouldn’t be a disqualifier for presidential candidates. While people are increasingly vulnerable to illness as they age past 70, there are also better medical treatments than ever before. Our “concept of old,” he stressed, has changed.
“I don’t think age should be used at all,” Olshansky said. “We shouldn’t be judging people based on their age, but based on their ideas.”
Clinton’s health has been a lingering source of speculation among her critics, dating to well before she announced her second White House campaign. Republican strategist Karl Rove called a concussion Clinton sustained in 2012 a “serious health episode” and suggested two years later she may have suffered a brain injury.
Last week, Clinton had an extensive coughing fit during a Labor Day rally in Cleveland, making it difficult for her to speak for about two minutes. She drank water and took a lozenge at the podium, going on to finish her remarks.
She also struggled with a cough during a question-and-answer session with reporters aboard her campaign plane last week. She said she suffers from seasonal allergies and had increased her dosage of antihistamines.
In a campaign podcast last month, Clinton said she does yoga and walks on the treadmill to stay fit. Trump, who famously dines regularly on fast food, has said he gets most of his exercise from playing golf and speaking at a podium during his campaign rallies. He plans to discuss his health regimen this week during an appearance on “The Dr. Oz Show.”
Clinton’s supporters have dismissed questions about her health by pointing to her globe-trotting schedule as secretary of state and lengthy appearance before Congress investigating the 2012 Benghazi attack, in which she sat for 11 hours.
Asked last week if she was concerned about “conspiracy theories” related to her health, Clinton said she wasn’t.
“There are so many of them,” she said, “I’ve lost track of them.”
Cyclists in the 2015 Philly Naked Bike Ride. Photo: Rashaad Jorden / Flickr
PHILADELPHIA — Thousands of bicyclists dared to be bare for the city’s annual nude ride promoting positive body image, cycling advocacy and fuel conservation.
About 3,000 people gathered Saturday for the eighth annual Philly Naked Bike Ride through the city’s streets. They set off from a park near the Philadelphia Museum of Art, where Sylvester Stallone ran up the steps in the “Rocky” movies.
The annual ride featured people sporting underwear, body paint, glitter or nothing at all. Some riders concerned about being recognized by their parents or co-workers wore masks while others wore just their shoes.
“It’s a really open and fun way of destigmatizing nudity,” said Oren Eisenberg, who was riding nude for the fifth time.
The 12-mile ride through the City of Brotherly Love is among many related to the World Naked Bike Ride movement. The riders pedal through the City of Brotherly Love past popular spots such as Independence Hall and Rittenhouse Square, where crowds cheer them on.
The Philly Naked Bike Ride, or PNBR, is a clothing optional bare-as-you-dare event, meaning participants can wear as much or as little as they want. Organizers say it’s an invitation to be naked but they want people to be comfortable and have fun no matter how much skin they expose.
Lots of the riders sprayed or splashed on body paint or let artists, led by Matt Deifer, do it for them. Deifer said he painted hundreds of them in Wildfire Visible Luminescent Paint colors including brilliant yellow, bright orange and deep blue.
Some riders held signs with slogans promoting their causes — or painted them on their breasts and backs.
“Nude not crude! Born this way,” was the message on Ben Heidari’s back.
PNBR volunteer Magda Esposito, a former chef and librarian, posed au naturel for fliers and videos promoting the event, went on test rides to help design this year’s route and vetted photographers seeking access to the pre-ride bodypainting area. She said she donated her time because she was inspired by the ride’s causes.
“Positive body image is something we all need a little more of,” she said, “and this is a fun and positive way to bring attention to it.”
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump smiles as he participates in an August roundtable discussion on national security in his offices in Trump Tower in New York. Photo: Gerald Herbert / Associated Press
CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts – Last month, 50 former national security officials who had served at high levels in Republican administrations from Richard Nixon to George W. Bush published a letter saying they would not vote for their party’s presidential nominee, Donald Trump. In their words, “a President must be disciplined, control emotions, and act only after reflection and careful deliberation.” Simply put, “Trump lacks the temperament to be President.”
In the terminology of modern leadership theory, Trump is deficient in emotional intelligence – the self-mastery, discipline, and empathic capacity that allows leaders to channel their personal passions and attract others. Contrary to the view that feelings interfere with thinking, emotional intelligence – which includes two major components, mastery of the self and outreach to others – suggests that the ability to understand and regulate emotions can make overall thinking more effective.
While the concept is modern, the idea is not new. Practical people have long understood its importance in leadership. In the 1930s, former Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, a crusty old veteran of the American Civil War, was taken to meet Franklin D. Roosevelt, a fellow Harvard graduate but one who had not been a distinguished student. Asked later about his impressions of the new president, Holmes famously quipped: “second-class intellect; first-class temperament.” Most historians would agree that Roosevelt’s success as a leader rested more on his emotional than his analytical IQ.
Psychologists have tried to measure intelligence for more than a century. General IQ tests measure such dimensions of intelligence as verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning, but IQ scores predict only about 10-20% of variation in life success. The 80% that remains unexplained is the product of hundreds of factors playing out over time. Emotional intelligence is one of them.
Some experts argue that emotional intelligence is twice as important as technical or cognitive skills. Others suggest it plays a more modest role. Moreover, psychologists differ about how the two dimensions of emotional intelligence – self-control and empathy – relate to each other. Bill Clinton, for example, scored low on the first but high on the second. Nonetheless, they agree that emotional intelligence is an important component of leadership. Richard Nixon probably had a higher IQ than Roosevelt, but much lower emotional intelligence.
Leaders use emotional intelligence to manage their “charisma” or personal magnetism across changing contexts. We all present ourselves to others in a variety of ways in order to manage the impressions we make: for example, we “dress for success.” Politicians, too, “dress” differently for different audiences. Ronald Reagan’s staff was famous for its effectiveness in managing impressions. Even a tough general like George Patton used to practice his scowl in front of a mirror.
Successful management of personal impressions requires some of the same emotional discipline and skill possessed by good actors. Acting and leadership have a great deal in common. Both combine self-control with the ability to project. Reagan’s prior experience as a Hollywood actor served him well in this regard, and Roosevelt was a consummate actor as well. Despite his pain and difficulty in moving on his polio-crippled legs, FDR maintained a smiling exterior, and was careful to avoid being photographed in the wheelchair he used.
Humans, like other primate groups, focus their attention on the leader. Whether CEOs and presidents realize it or not, the signals they convey are always closely watched. Emotional intelligence involves awareness and control of such signals, and the self-discipline that prevents personal psychological needs from distorting policy. Nixon, for example, could strategize effectively on foreign policy; but he was less able to manage the personal insecurities that caused him to create an “enemies list” and eventually led to his downfall.
Trump has some of the skills of emotional intelligence. He is an actor whose experience hosting a reality-television show enabled him to dominate the crowded Republican primary field and attract considerable media attention. Dressing for the occasion in his signature red baseball cap with the slogan “Make America Great Again,” he appeared to have gamed the system with a winning strategy of using “politically incorrect” statements to focus attention on himself and gain enormous free publicity.
But Trump has proven deficient in terms of self-control, leaving him unable to move toward the center for the general election. Likewise, he has failed to display the discipline needed to master the details of foreign policy, with the result that, unlike Nixon, he comes across as naive about world affairs.
Trump has a reputation as a bully in interactions with peers, but that is not bad per se. As the Stanford psychologist Roderick Kramer has pointed out, President Lyndon Johnson was a bully, and many Silicon Valley entrepreneurs have a bullying style. But Kramer calls such figures bullies with a vision that inspires others to want to follow them.
And Trump’s narcissism has led him to overreact, often counter-productively, to criticism and affronts. For example, he became embroiled in a dispute with an American Muslim couple whose son, a US soldier, was killed in Iraq, and in a petty feud with Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, after Trump felt slighted. In such cases, Trump stepped on his own message.
It is this deficiency in his emotional intelligence that has cost Trump the support of some of the most distinguished foreign policy experts in his party and in the country. In their words, “he is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood. He does not encourage conflicting views. He lacks self-control and acts impetuously. He cannot tolerate criticism.” Or, as Holmes might say, Trump has been disqualified by his second-class temperament.
Joseph S. Nye, Jr. teaches at Harvard and is the author of Is the American Century Over?
Filipino film maker Lav Diaz holds the Golden Lion award for his movie " Ang Babaeng Humayo " (The woman who left) during the awards ceremony of the 73rd Venice International Film Festival. Photo: M. Angeles Salvador / Associate Press
VENICE, Italy — The black-and-white revenge tale “The Woman Who Left” by Filipino director Lav Diaz won the Golden Lion prize for best picture Saturday at the Venice Film Festival.
Andre Konchalovsky and Amat Escalante shared this year’s Silver Lion for best direction for their respective films: “Paradise” from Russia and Germany and “The Untamed” from Mexico.
Tom Ford’s noir thriller “Nocturnal Animals” from the U.S. won the grand jury prize.
Argentine actor Oscar Martinez of “The Distinguished Citizen” and American actress Emma Stone of “La La Land” were honored with the acting trophies.
Noah Oppenheimer won best screenplay for “Jackie,” which centers on Jackie Kennedy at the time of John F. Kennedy’s assassination.
A jury led by British director Sam Mendes chose winners from among 20 movies competing at the 73rd annual festival.
The world’s oldest film festival wrapped up Saturday after 11 days that brought stars including Natalie Portman, Chris Pratt and Denzel Washington to the canal-crossed Italian city.
The complete list of winners:
— Golden Lion: Lav Diaz, “The Woman Who Left”; Philippines.
— Silver Lion director (tie): Andre Konchalovsky, “Paradise”; Russia, Germany.
— Silver Lion director (tie): Amat Escalante, “The Untamed”; Mexico.
— Jury grand prize: “Nocturnal Animals,” Tom Ford; U.S.
— Special jury prize: “The Bad Batch,” Ana Lily Amirpour; U.S.
— Actor: Oscar Martinez, “The Distinguished Citizen”; Argentina, Spain.
— Actress: Emma Stone, “La La Land”; U.S.
— Screenplay: Noah Oppenheim, “Jackie”; U.S.
— Marcello Mastroianni Price for Young Performer: Paula Beer, “Frantz”; France.
— Luigi De Laurentiis Lion of the Future: “The Last of Us,” Ala Eddine Slim; Tunisia.
A beam from the destroyed World Trade Center buildings, part of the 9/11 Memorial this past Sept. 3 near the Veterans' Pavilion at the Fulton County Fair, in Wauseon, Ohio. Photo: Jetta Fraser / Associated Press
NEW YORK — Behind the barbed wire, the white minivan’s busted windows and crumpled roof hint at its story. But forklifted to this windblown spot on the John F. Kennedy International Airport tarmac, between a decommissioned 727 and an aircraft hangar, it’s doubtful passing drivers notice it at all.
In the long struggle with the searing memories of 9/11, though, the van’s solitary presence here marks a small but significant transition point.
Tons of wreckage – twisted steel beams weighing up to 40,000 pounds, chunks of concrete smelling of smoke, a crushed fire engine, a dust-covered airline slipper – were salvaged from the World Trade Center site for preservation in the weeks after the 2001 terrorist attacks. Now, 15 years later, this van, part of a government agency motor pool likely sheltered from the impact in the parking garage beneath the complex, is the very last artifact without a resting place.
When the van is claimed, as soon as a few weeks from now, it will fulfill a pledge that, to move beyond 9/11 without losing sight of it, New York would share relics of that terror, along with the tales of sacrifice and fear that come with them.
The decision by officials to give away pieces of Trade Center wreckage has been praised and criticized over the years. But its impact is undeniable.
More than 2,600 artifacts have gone to 1,585 fire and police departments, schools and museums, and other nonprofit organizations in every state and at least eight other countries. Each recipient has pledged to use them in memorials or exhibits honoring those killed on 9/11. While some have not followed through, the many that have mean it is now possible to touch a piece of September 11 during a Roman Catholic Mass in Port St. Lucie, Florida, while standing in the shadows of Colorado’s San Juan mountains, or in a park honoring animals in Meaford, Ontario.
“They are the relics of the destruction and they have the same power in the same way as medieval relics that have the power of the saints,” said Harriet Senie, a professor of art history at the City University of New York and author of “Memorials to Shattered Myths: Vietnam to 9/11.”
“History is a vague concept, but if you have this tangible object that was a part of this historical event, it makes it very difficult to deny and it also makes it possible to experience it in a very visceral way.”
In the days immediately after the attacks, it wasn’t at all clear what would happen to the wreckage of the Trade Center. It’s not as if anyone had confronted questions of that scale before. There was no certainty about exactly which artifacts, if any, should be saved.
The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, which owned the Trade Center, dispatched an architect to comb through the site and cull pieces that seemed distinctive. Investigators carted away others. Most of the wreckage from the site was scrapped or recycled. But the agency saved about half of 1 percent of the total.
It all had to go somewhere. That ended up being JFK’s Hangar 17, an 80,000-square-foot cavern of sheet metal left empty when tenant Tower Air went out of business in 2000.
Officials were uncertain what to do with so much material, given the emotions intertwined with it. A judge determined the artifacts were not evidentiary or personal, and approved donations to those who promised to care for them. But where to begin?
“It was piles and piles, probably my height or higher, of steel beams,” says Amy Passiak, the archivist hired to catalog the artifacts and manage their distribution, recalling the first time she walked into the hangar in 2010. Passiak, a high school senior in Michigan at the time of the attacks, had been working as an intern at New York’s 9/11 museum, but says she was still unprepared for the scene.
“I remember going home that day and just being exhausted, just from being there a few hours, just being emotionally exhausted and not being able to comprehend the amount of work that was going to go into the process. It was like, maybe a year, maybe two years. And here I am, six years later.”
Passiak built a database of every item, cataloging its size and approximate weight, with descriptive notes. As word spread that the Port Authority was giving the material away, requests poured in. Through August, the Port Authority had distributed 2,629 artifacts.
Many went to fire departments, local governments and organizations in the New York area with direct ties to the first responders and workers who perished when the towers fell.
“When those buildings came down, everybody and everything in its path was either pulverized or vaporized off the face of the earth,” said John Hodge of the Stephen Siller Tunnels to Towers Foundation, named for his cousin, a New York firefighter killed on 9/11. In late July, the foundation marked the looming closure of Hangar 17 with a ceremony outside before hauling away an elevator motor from the Trade Center, a piece of the parking structure, and a portion of a broadcast antenna that crowned the complex.
“That’s where the DNA is. Neither my cousin or anybody else from Squad 1 was ever found, but it’s in that steel,” Hodge said.
But for many of the people and groups that adopted artifacts from the Trade Center, the loss was more abstract. At least it started off that way.
Heath Satow, a sculptor in southern California hired to design a 9/11 memorial for the plaza fronting Rosemead’s city offices, recalls awkwardly scanning a digital catalog showing beams available from the Trade Center. But hundreds of hours creating the memorial – a 10-foot beam cradled by hands of chrome, the palms and fingers formed from 2,976 interlocking birds representing individual victims – left a deep impression.
“Every individual was attended to,” said Satow, his voice breaking five years later, as he described making the sculpture. “I just was totally unprepared for it. But when you spend all that time seeing it as individuals it will just wreck you.”
Satow said he purposely positioned the beam at about eye level, so people could see, touch and feel it. Others who adopted Trade Center artifacts used them to similar effect.
Firefighters in Pagosa Springs, Colorado, created a memorial in front of their station around a small piece of donated I-beam. Many people in the town, surrounded by the San Juan mountains and the Southern Ute Reservation, will never get to New York or Washington D.C., said David Hartman, who worked to obtain the artifact. But September 11 was his generation’s Pearl Harbor, and being able to see and touch the wreckage enables residents to reflect on its lessons, he said.
A van damaged in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, outside Hangar 17 at the JFK airport in August in New York. Photo: Amy Passiak / Associated Press
At Flour Bluff Junior High School in Corpus Christi, Texas, a piece of Trade Center steel – one of three received by the school district – is housed in a case near the entrance to the cafeteria. In September, it is taken out and students from the school’s officer training program stand guard. Bruce Chaney, the naval science instructor who applied for the artifacts, brings another, smaller piece to his classes.
The artifact is “twisted and somewhat burned. It’s not pretty. I’m hoping it will make them think as they’re growing up, that they have to pay attention to their past,” Chaney said.
Most Flour Bluff students hadn’t yet been born in 2001, so the relics are the closest most will ever get to experiencing that day.
But the desire to touch and own history, however distant, has been around since long before this generation, said Erika Doss, a professor of American studies at the University of Notre Dame and author of “Memorial Mania: Public Feeling in America.”
She notes that after Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, millions of Americans gathered alongside the tracks as a train carrying his body made its way to Illinois. People wore mourning bands on their arms. They hung Lincoln’s portrait in their homes. They flocked to see death masks cast from his face. They wanted to see and touch Lincoln.
Artifacts let people grapple with pained memories. But 15 years after September 11, the dispersal of artifacts from the Trade Center has not resolved the public’s conflicted feelings about those events, now set against continued fears of terrorism.
“We just don’t know where the events of 9/11 have led us,” said Rick Sluder, fire chief in Wauseon, Ohio, which obtained a Trade Center beam and, together with neighboring departments built a memorial at the nearby Fulton County Fairgrounds.
“A lot of people are looking at this as, is this the point of downfall or the point at which we rose above the rest, the point of resiliency?” Sluder said. “I don’t think that’s been determined yet.”
There’s little questioning, though, the emotions people invest in the artifacts. During the six years Passiak spent archiving the relics, the people seeking them would often tell her stories of the losses in their own communities – of firefighters, or soldiers or others – that connected them, however tangentially, to 9/11.
In the first years, there were so many artifacts that she could easily match them with requesters. So when a girl at Cracker Trail Elementary School in Sebring, Florida, wrote that she wanted to help her fellow students learn about 9/11, Passiak set aside a children’s alarm clock recovered from a store in the Trade Center’s concourse, a burned notebook, and small piece of steel, 6 inches square.
“I felt like that allowed a full story to be told,” she said.
As the piles of material winnowed, though, it became more difficult. Most of the groups seeking artifacts wanted pieces they could build a narrative around. The biggest artifacts were unwieldy. By early this year, there was little left except rails from the commuter train line that ran under the complex. Items like police cruisers, whose purpose that day were clear, found takers. But unmarked vehicles, anonymous but for their place in the wreckage, were initially passed over.
When the Port Authority shuttered the artifact program in August and padlocked Hangar 17, officials moved the only remaining artifact – a Dodge Caravan with a ripped out red interior – to the tarmac, uncertain of its fate. It, too, is likely to go soon, to a group officials will not identify until its application has been approved. Hangar 17, itself, may eventually be torn down.
Passiak moved back to Michigan to start a job at an art museum this month. But many of the people whose groups received donations of Trade Center artifacts have stayed in touch with her, extending invitations to visit their memorials, from California to Germany.
Someday, the archivist said, she’d like to take a road trip, stopping in cities and towns along the way to see where the artifacts she once cared for have found homes. She imagines she’ll recognize some of them, and remember their stories. It will not matter that the steel, concrete and other relics are at rest far from lower Manhattan. The memories they hold, she is certain, will not soon fade.
BANGKOK — Everyone is lawyering up in a burning dispute between a flight attendant and the woman she groveled before earlier this month – a topic of national obsession which has begun to spin lawsuits and threats of more.
A lawyer for Jumpoon Chavasiri, the passenger whose complaints over an AirAsia flight attendant kicked off the whole thing late last month filed legal complaints Friday against the internet, namely Facebook group Black Hat, for allegedly defamatory things posted there. Meanwhile, a legal adviser to the flight attendant said Saturday she is weighing lawsuits against the airline and Jumpoon.
Attorney Chatchai Chookaew said Saturday that all indications point to the fact his client, a senior flight attendant for Thai Air Asia identified only as Mai Awatsara, was forced by her management to kowtow on the floor before an infuriated passenger earlier this month. The airline has denied this.
“From the evidence gathered, there are many indicators showing that my client was being forced before she kowtowed to the passenger,” Chatchai said. He said evidence included things posted online and the passenger’s own prolific public postings about what happened.
Jumpool had complained that Awatsara disrespected her developmentally disabled daughter.
AirAsia CEO Tony Fernandes flew to Thailand on Thursday to affirm the #AirGraab incident was being investigated. The airline said in a statement the same day that despite the “highly sensitive and emotional” incident, the airline “never obligated our staff to perform an act of prostration.”
Whether forced or voluntary, Awatsara met with the Jumpoon on Sept. 2 to graab, an act of utmost humility in which she knelt on the floor in apology.
Social media is still seething, where many accuse the airline of misrepresenting what happened.
Fernandes said he also flew down to visit Awatsara’s family who reportedly refused to meet with him.
Chatchai, 46, said that a lawsuit could be filed against Jumpoon who complained that Awatsara disrespected her developmentally disabled daughter, on the grounds of libel or violating the Computer Crime Act for things she has written online. As for her superiors at the airline, he believes a criminal complaint could be filed.
The lawyer said his client has been traumatized by the affair and the inordinate interest it has generated.
“After the incident, my client has cried almost every day and shut herself off from social media during her days off. She doesn’t want to commit any offense against anyone,” he said.