30 C
Bangkok
Saturday, June 20, 2026
Home Blog Page 2640

New ‘People’s Reform Party’ Would See Prayuth Prime Minister of Elected Gov’t

Junta leader and Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha rides in an electric vehicle Wednesday at Government House in Bangkok.

BANGKOK — A move to establish a military-friendly political party to appoint the junta leader prime minister again under an elected government was met with mixed reactions in the political sphere, though the consensus was that pro-junta elements and their proxies want a larger political space.

After a former senator declared earlier this week he would create a new party called the People’s Reform Party to support Prayuth Chan-ocha becoming prime minister again, an MP in the former government ousted by Prayuth called it a clear move to drag Thailand back to the 1980s or earlier.

A new political party to seat junta chief Prayuth Chan-ocha as prime minister of a new civilian government recalled past parties which wielded political power for the military, such as the 'Justice Unity Party'
A new political party to seat junta chief Prayuth Chan-ocha as prime minister of a new civilian government recalled past parties which wielded political power for the military, such as the ‘Justice Unity Party’

“This is not beyond my expectations,” said Weng Tojirakan of the Pheu Thai Party and a leader of the Redshirt movement. “The fate of Thailand is to become a military-bureaucratic state with elections as a veneer. I really don’t know of what will really happen.”

He accused the junta of seeking power for the next two decades by going back to the days when political parties acted as fronts or a proxy for the military.

In announcing the move, former senator Paiboon Nititawan said Prayuth was the most suitable person to lead the nation. For his part, Prayuth declined to comment on the idea when asked about it Wednesday.

Weng said it was “highly likely” some factions within his Pheu Thai Party could break away to join a pro-junta party out a pragmatic desire to hold power.

“There are ideologically driven Pheu Thai MPs, but there are also those without ideology,” Weng said.

Democrat Party deputy leader Nipit Intarasombat was less concerned such a party would pose a threat to the Democrats. He said political parties are easy to launch but difficult to sustain in the long-run as an institution.

Nipit questioned the need for Paiboon to do so when the junta, aka National Council for Peace and Order, will be able to virtually pick all the 250 members of the senate under the constitution passed by referendum Sunday. That referendum also granted those junta appointees a voice in selecting an unelected figure for the post of prime minister.

“That 250 senate members is already like a big political party in which the members are in their hands. The 250 appointed senators should be enough to ensure the [elected] government would fall in line,” Nipit said.

The three-decade veteran politician added however that people should wait and see if Prayuth accepts endorsement by the party.

Political analyst and Voice TV program host Sirote Klampaiboon believes the new party, if established, would simply become a new political outlet for pro-junta elements who are passed over for seats in the new junta-appointed senate. He also said it’s not easy to set up a proxy party that can really win enough parliamentary seats to wield influence.

“This party is for the enlargement of a political space for those who will not be appointed as senators,” Sirote said.

Advertisement

Police Roused to Compel Apology From Woman Tourist For Wet Dress

This photo of female tourist in a long, light dress rendered translucent when it became wet was taken at a landmark Phuket temple, Wat Chalong. It was widely shared for public criticism on Wednesday.

PHUKET — Though the length was acceptable, some people thought it let too much light through.

A woman tourist was briefly held by tourist police and made to offer a wai and apology Wednesday after photos spread of her wearing a thin dress made sheer by the rain at Phuket’s largest temple, Wat Chalong.

“She apologized,” said police Maj.Gen. Naruwat Phuttawiro. “It was raining, so the dress was wet and became even more transparent than usual.”

A group of tourists and their tour guide apologize for the dress worn by the woman, second from right, Wednesday at Phuket Tourist Police Command Center.
A group of tourists and their tour guide apologize for the dress worn by the woman, second from right, Wednesday at Phuket Tourist Police Command Center.

Tourist police tracked down the woman through her tour company and told her to come to the police station at 9pm, so they could explain how the dress was inappropriate in a sacred place, according to Thai values.

Naruwat said the temple usually have staff at the entrance to inform visitors on proper dress, but it was a rainy day and no one approached the woman.

She was made to apologize to a temple representative and the people of Phuket.

Tourist police said they would remind all tour companies to be strict with their clients on the issue.

Advertisement

Wave of PKK Attacks in Southeast Turkey Kill At Least 12

Police search an area after a bomb attack Wednesday in Mardin, Turkey. Photo: Neriman Celebi/ IHA via AP

ANKARA, Turkey — A wave of Kurdish rebel attacks targeting police and soldiers in Turkey’s mainly Kurdish southeast killed at least 12 people on Wednesday, as Turkey was still dealing with the aftermath of a failed military coup attempt that threatened the government.

Officials said rebels of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, launched simultaneous bomb attacks targeting police vehicles in the city of Diyarbakir and the town of Kiziltepe, killing eight people, while four soldiers were killed in a separate attack near the border with Iraq hours earlier.

The attack in Kiziltepe was caused by a roadside bomb that went off as a police bus was passing by. Three people were killed and at least 25 others were wounded there, including at least five children aged between 2 and 5, said an official, who spoke on condition of anonymity in line with government regulations.

At the same time, a car bomb explosion targeting police in a historic part of the city Diyarbakir killed at least five civilians and wounded 12 others, the Diyarbakir governor’s office said. The explosion occurred at a security checkpoint at a bridge over the Tigris river.

The attacks came hours after an earlier attack, also blamed on the PKK, killed four soldiers and injured nine others near the border with Iraq. The private Dogan news agency said that attack targeted military vehicles and was carried out with improvised explosives as well as rockets fired from northern Iraq.

Clashes between the PKK and Turkey’s security forces resumed last year after a tenuous cease-fire collapsed and the PKK has frequently targeted police or military with roadside explosives or car bombs.

Wednesday’s attacks, however, came as the country is still reeling from a violent coup attempt on July 15 that killed at least 270 people. The government has blamed the failed coup on the supporters of U.S.-based Muslim cleric Fethullah Gulen and has embarked on a sweeping crackdown on his followers.

The country is also combating the Islamic State group, whose militants have carried out a series of bloody attacks in Turkeyin the past year.

U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter said in a statement Wednesday that the U.S. stands “shoulder to shoulder” with its Turkish ally in the wake of the attacks.

“The United States remains committed to cooperating closely with Turkey — bilaterally, within the Counter-ISIL Coalition, and within NATO — in order to defend our nations against common threats,” he said.

Earlier this week, PKK commander Cemil Bayik threatened attacks against police in Turkish cities, according to media reports.

Since hostilities with the PKK resumed last summer, more than 600 Turkish security personnel and thousands of PKK militants have been killed, according to the state-run Anadolu Agency. Human rights groups say hundreds of civilians have also died.

Turkey and its allies consider the PKK a terror organization.

 

Story: Suzan Fraser 

Advertisement

When Thainess Means Gotta Ban’Em All

Whenever disruptive innovation reaches the shores of Thailand, time and again the knee-jerk reaction is to make a huge fuss, ban it as yet another Western evil, launch an “improved” and “appropriate” Thai alternative that nobody ends up using, and finally forget about it when people move on to the next crisis du jour.

Remember the uproar over Uber motorcycles? Or Uber cars for that matter? Thailand banned them, launched something Thai that was “better” and then left it to rot in peace.

I am still waiting for a government-approved Uber alternative app to arrive for my Pebble smartwatch – and therein lies the rub. There is no way the “legal” Go Bike developers would focus their efforts on the Pebble platform while Uber does have a pretty usable Pebble app. Thailand is tiny in the big scheme of things. The powers that be simply do not understand the concept of  “ecosystem” or that Thailand is no longer the center of the universe.

Remember SiamTube? Of course not. This “improved” Thai imitation of YouTube launched back in 2007 because YouTube was, well, evil and full of bad Western propaganda and values. Today, the site doesn’t even resolve, and everyone watches YouTube.

Or how about when Thailand answered Hotmail with Khonthai.com webmail? A whole whopping 2 meeeellion bytes of free, official government goodness for every patriotic Thai citizen to use for safe, secure, official (and undoubtedly backdoored) communication.

Ultimately every case ends after a lot of huffing and puffing with nothing more happening than the evil Western companies winning while Thai innovation or participation in the ecosystem is squashed.

Fast-forward to today and see the same fiasco replayed over Pokemon Go. Telecoms regulators huff and puff at Nintendo (rather than actual developers Niantic) for several days while strutting their make-believe power to control the rest of the world.

More meaningful than Pokeman is the topic of Bitcoin. A decentralised, unstoppable, borderless electronic currency is a good idea, especially for the poor and unbanked. Whether you agree Bitcoin is a good thing (quick test: replace the word “Bitcoin” with “cash” in whatever argument you have and then stop blaming technology), it is happening. And in the great Thai tradition of banning ‘em all, the Bank of Thailand demonized and squished it before it took root with rules that effectively outlawed it.

Read the terms and conditions on one of Thailand’s major bitcoin exchanges, bx.in.th, next time you need a good laugh.

“No foreign currency exchange. The customer must agree never to exchange currencies purchased from the website for any foreign currency other than Thai Baht,” it reads. “The customer must also guarantee that any crypto-currency the customer sells at the website have never been involved in exchange with any foreign currency other than Thai Baht.”

To anyone who understands how Bitcoin works, that statement is both impossible to comply with and practically impossible to enforce. Bitcoins are math and exist everywhere in every single Bitcoin node all over the world at the same time. The concept of borders simply does not compute.

Like the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commision pretends now to control the world of Pokemon, the BOT pretends it can control Bitcoin and keep its lucrative foreign exchange monopoly intact.

Like the best Thai laws, it simply creates a mechanism for capricious, selective enforcement. The BOT can, if it wishes, pick out any Bitcoin user on a whim for persecution, I mean, prosecution. Of course, whether it does so depends on how good that user appears in the eyes of the powers that be.

But while all this huffing and puffing may appear to only massage the egos of those in power, it does comes with a cost. This ban-them-all attitude kills grassroots innovation. (Sorry, I mean home-grown innovation Gen. Prayut has banned the use of the word “grassroots” because reasons).

Innovation simply goes to more fertile jurisdictions such as Singapore, and what little is left remains clenched in the hands of the conglomerates and banksters.

Or perhaps that was the plan all along.

 

Ed. note: As longtime fans of Don’s writing at Telecom Asia, we are delighted to have him join Khaosod English as an occasional columnist.

Advertisement

Expats Could be Exempt From SIM Card Tracking

Photo: Jorge Gonzalez / Flickr

BANGKOK — A government regulator Wednesday played down the certainty of tracking all foreigners by phone SIM cards after the plan was met with concern and ridicule.

Takorn Tantasith, secretary general of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission said the plan approved Tuesday requiring foreigners use SIM cards which report their locations would not move forward without input from the public – including foreign residents.

“Expats living in Thailand can also join the discussion, once we hold a public hearing on this,” he said Wednesday.

He said the hearing would be attended by service providers, police, immigration officers and even tour company operators. Most of the media interest at Wednesday’s news conference was dedicated to Takorn’s concerns about Pokemon Go, however.

Would it Work?

If the idea goes forward, does the technology support what’s been suggested?

Don Sambandaraksa, a correspondent with Telecom Asia, said the tech already exists and in fact was made commercially available last year by AIS.

What’s been proposed by the commission, he said, opens the door to abuse by allowing the government to circumvent legal safeguards to track people.

“The only reason they would need to implement SIM-based tracking is if they want to track people without needing a court order and telco cooperation,” he said. “There’s no other logical explanation.”

Triangulating locations has long been possible through tracking the cell phone towers users connect to – the kind of metadata controversially collected by the United States’ NSA.

The difference is making a SIM card which would actively report its locational information over the phone network — like SMS. No internet data, no GPS required.

The problem is if it’s collected by a government server, Don said.

“The only reason they might need special SIMs would be to bypass the telco,” he said. “So they don’t have to have any moral qualms about tracking people.”

Though scant on details just how it would work, Takorn has insisted no privacy would be infringed upon, as he believed the information would only be obtainable with a court warrant. He said it would be an advantage for foreign tourists, as authorities could get help to them faster.

He stressed the policy didn’t come from the military government but came from an Aug. 2 meeting of telecommunication regulators of 10 ASEAN countries in Phuket.

Don was unconvinced.

“The junta has made it clear again and again that when it comes to cracking down on dissent on the internet, they are willing to pay any cost and endure any ridicule from the international community,” he said  “I would not be surprised if they do issue every single foreigner these independent-of-carrier, involvement-tracking SIMs just to persecute a select few.”

Moving Forward

The commission’s board approved the plan Tuesday. Despite approving it, Takorn said some flaws were raised by board members. One of the major issues, he said, was that some board members didn’t think it should apply to long-term foreign residents.

“The focus is definitely on tourists,” he said. “But there should be a discussion about whether some foreigners who live here over a year should be allowed to use normal SIM cards.”

Others argued that existing SIM cards, all of which sold in Thailand must be registered, can be used to triangulate approximate the locations of their holders already.

“If it’s determined that existing SIM cards can find the location of users already, then we won’t issue this new type,” he said.

It’s the second issue Takorn has raised in recent days in which there seems to be little supply of knowledge informing the process of regulatory decision making.

The root of the idea, Takorn said, came from trying to solve the shortage of phone numbers.

With the SIM card’s tracking information, he said they could more quickly recycle prepaid numbers removed from the country by tourists.

On Monday he suggested numbers could be revoked after someone left for 15 days, a suggestion  which also raised concern among long-term residents who travel.

No date was given for a public hearing on the plan; Takorn said the whole process would take about six months.

 

Related stories:

From WTF to LOL, Internet Reacts to Plan to Track Foreigners by Phones

Plan to Track All Foreigners – Not Just Tourists – By SIM Cards Moves Forward

Advertisement

Model Files Charges Against Woman Who Filmed Her Naked

Viraluk Sutthiprapa appears in a December promotional video

BANGKOK — A woman caught having sex with another’s boyfriend and subsequently humiliated in a now-viral video has filed a criminal charge over the matter.

Saranya Sae-han, 24, asked police Monday to prosecute Viraluk Sutthiprapa, 24, for filming her as she was physically ejected from the condominium Viraluk shared with her now-former boyfriend.

In her complaint, Saranya accused Viraluk of spreading the video on social media to shame her, and asked police to prosecute her under the Computer Crime Act’s provisions on defamation and indecency. She did not speak publicly at Huai Khwang Police station but later posted a message online.

“Thank you for all of your support,” Saranya wrote in a public Facebook message. “My family, friends, professors, media, police, everyone. I thank you for all the support you gave me. It’s so precious to a person who never thought she would see this much support.”

The video of the incident, which reportedly took place in the early hours of July 31, surfaced on social media last week. It shows Saranya weeping in apparent terror as Viraluk harangues her out of the room unclothed. Her clothes and phone are then thrown out after her.

Many online directed their condemnation not at Saranya, but at Viraluk for not holding her boyfriend responsible.

“I’m not taking anyone’s side in this matter,” wrote Facebook user Arthit Anannab. “But I’ve seen so many incidents, when they involve men who have mistresses, the wives only punish the mistresses but do nothing to their husbands. This is horrible. Why didn’t she kick the guy?”

Both women work as promotional models called “pretties,” who are hired to promote products and events.

In a television appearance Tuesday, Viraluk said she came home at about 3am on July 31 to find her unnamed boyfriend naked and in flagrante with Saranya on their sofa.

After she slapped the man for cheating on her, Viraluk told the hosts of the Pak Pong show, she chased the woman out of the door in anger and filmed the whole scene. She said wanted the footage as a reminder but denied uploading it.

“I filmed the video to remind myself why I broke up with him,” she said. “I had no intention of publishing it.”

She said she lost the phone, and believed someone found it and shared it on social media.

Police said they are investigating to ascertain who posted the video.

Advertisement

Authorities Threaten to Ban Pokemon Go

Two Pokemon Go players pose for a photo Tuesday evening at Bangkok's Siam Paragon shopping mall. The mall was choked with players wandering around playing the game late into the evening.

BANGKOK — Telecommunications regulators threatened to ban Pokemon Go if developers refuse to restrict the areas where it is played.

Acknowledging it was unsure it had the legal authority, the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, or NBTC, on Wednesday said it would ban the game if its San Francisco-based developer does not respond to their request to limit areas where Pokemon appear.

“If they do not proceed, we might have to do what the prime minister wants, which is banning the game,” said Takorn Tantasith. “Russia and Iran also banned it.”

Nothing’s sacred for one player Monday at Bangkok’s Wat Bua Kwan.
Nothing’s sacred for one player Monday at Bangkok’s Wat Bua Kwan.

After being widely misrepresented in the media as the force behind bringing Pokemon Go to Thailand, telecommunications conglomerate True Corp was summoned by the commission Tuesday and asked to deliver its message to game developer Niantic. Takorn said he’d also like to know if Niantic could limit it to certain hours.

True clarified they weren’t involved with the game and only hold a license for the characters. The Pokemon cartoon has appeared on its TrueVisions satellite service. Nevertheless, the company said it would do what it could.

On Wednesday, the secretary general announced True had drafted a letter to Niantic which would be submitted to the American developer on Thursday after his office reviewed it.

Takorn, a top regulatory official, admitted he would need to go back to study the law on who held the power to ban the mobile game.

Asked why he was so alarmed by the game, Takorn acknowledged it wasn’t the first of its type.

“But nothing ever made people walk around in a governmental or religious place,” he said.

As the fad becomes a burning obsession and public places fill with players of the augmented-reality game, what is understandably a generational misunderstanding seems exacerbated by a poor understanding of what the game is and how it works.

Takorn’s statements reflected an improved understanding of the game since Monday, when he believed it was operated out of Tokyo by Nintendo. Still, while Iran announced a ban which has been ignored by Niantic, Russia has only threatened to do so.

The locations where the game are played were established several years ago by players of Niantic’s previous augmented-reality game Ingress, which lacked the power of a popular franchise to take off.

Those locations, many of which are landmarks or public buildings, were essentially recycled when Pokemon Go went live on Saturday.

Authorities want four types of areas removed:

  1. Dangerous places such as roads, narrow sidewalks, riverside or seaside locations and railways
  2. Sacred sites, such as religious structures and historical sites
  3. Sensitive sites, such as government areas
  4. Private property

There are precedents for Niantic agreeing to remove Pokestops upon request.

But they’ve only been in extremely sensitive locations so far, such as the Hiroshima Peace Memorial in Japan and the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C.

 

Advertisement

‘Untrue Blue’ and The Presumed Joy of Being Middle Class

Untrue Blue exhibition. Photo: Muangthai Jirawongnirandon / Courtesy

BANGKOK — Human misery transcends class, and a particular malaise is abstractly expressed in the photos of a recent film grad and self-confessed member of the hoi polloi.

Being middle class, photographer Muangthai Jirawongnirandon said, doesn’t mean roads are paved with roses, as they have human hearts as well. The 22-year-old recent Thammasat University graduate will offer his roughly defined take on the human condition through the lens of his life and landscape photography later this month in “Untrue Blue.”

“‘Untrue Blue’ reflects a common saying I’ve always heard when depressed. People often say there are many people out there who suffer more than I do, as they don’t even have money to buy food or clothes to wear,” the 22-year-old photographer explained his first exhibition’s title. “Why can’t middle class people be miserable? The photos are questions about the emotion.”

Muangthai spent three years taking photos in Thailand, Hong Kong and Taiwan, 11 expressive photos of which were chosen to represent his own confusing period of transition after graduating.

“Through photos, I reexamine my past mistakes; things I haven’t done and also my unknown future,” said the film studies graduate.

The opening party starts at 7pm on Aug. 26 with the kind of post-rock, instrumental music and some servings of homebrew beer found at art-bar Jam Cafe, located just off lower Sathorn Road. The exhibition runs through Sept. 16. Jam is a short walk from BTS Surasak.

Advertisement

Trump Ignites New Firestorm: Gun Backers Might Stop Clinton

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally in July. Photo: Evan Vucci / Associated Press

WILMINGTON, N.C. — Donald Trump ignited a fresh political firestorm Tuesday by declaring gun rights supporters might still find a way to stop Hillary Clinton, even if she should defeat him and then name anti-gun Supreme Court justices. Democrats pounced, accusing him of openly encouraging violence against his opponent.

The Republican presidential nominee has been working this week to move past distracting campaign disputes, but once again he put himself at the center of a blazing controversy.

First, he falsely claimed that Clinton, his Democratic opponent, wants to “essentially abolish the Second Amendment.” She has said repeatedly that she supports the Second Amendment right to own guns, though she does back some stricter gun control measures.

Trump then noted the power Clinton would have to nominate justices to the high court.

“By the way, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump told supporters at a rally in Wilmington, North Carolina. “But I’ll tell you what. That will be a horrible day.”

The reaction from Democrats was immediate. Said her campaign manager, Robby Mook: “This is simple — what Trump is saying is dangerous. A person seeking to be the president of the United States should not suggest violence in any way.”

Trump’s reaction later as the uproar grew: “Give me a break.” Interviewed by Fox News’ Sean Hannity, he said everyone in his audience knew he was referring to the power of voters and “there can be no other interpretation.”

Trump’s campaign sought to quell the controversy with a statement that blamed the “dishonest media” for misinterpretation. And Trump’s running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, said his boss was talking about the election choice for pro-gun voters, not encouraging violence.

Yet Trump’s foes were unconvinced and unforgiving.

Tim Kaine, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, said, “I think it was just revealing … and I don’t find the attempt to roll it back persuasive at all.”

Priorities USA, a super PAC supporting Clinton, said Trump had “suggested that someone shoot Hillary Clinton.” Across the country, Democratic House and Senate candidates piled on, working to tie Trump’s comments to their GOP opponents.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which has endorsed Clinton, said Trump was encouraging gun violence “based on conspiracy theory about Hillary Clinton.”

Tweeted Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, “@realDonaldTrump makes death threats because he’s a pathetic coward who can’t handle the fact that he’s losing to a girl.”

The National Rifle Association, the gun lobby that has endorsed Trump, came to his defense. The group wrote on Twitter that “there’s nothing we can do” if Clinton is elected, urging voters to defeat her in November.

The controversy immediately overwhelmed Trump’s intended campaign-trail focus: the economic plan he unveiled just a day earlier and was promoting during a series of rallies in the most competitive general election states. It also reinforced the concern, voiced by many worried Republicans, that he cannot stay disciplined and avoid inflammatory remarks that imperil not only his White House prospects but the re-election chances of many GOP lawmakers.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, who was celebrating a primary victory in Wisconsin Tuesday night, said: “It sounds like just a joke gone bad. I hope they clear this up very quickly. You never joke about something like that.”

At another rally later Tuesday in Fayetteville, Trump was careful with his words. He repeated his argument that Clinton poses a threat to gun rights, but avoided any talk about advocates taking matters into their own hands. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, introducing him, blamed the controversy on “disgusting” journalists.

Clinton’s supporters are hoping the latest Trump trip-up will lead yet more of his fellow Republicans to defect. A day earlier, Maine Sen. Susan Collins became the latest to declare she won’t vote for her party’s nominee, explicitly pointing to his “constant stream of cruel comments.”

The U.S. Secret Service, responsible for both Clinton’s and Trump’s protection, said it was aware of what Trump had said but declined to say whether it planned to investigate.

Contrary to Trump’s remarks, Clinton has made her support for gun rights a key piece of her stump speech in a bid to pre-empt attacks from Trump and groups like the NRA. Still, she supports reinstating a federal assault weapons ban, expanding background checks and barring purchases by domestic abusers, among other steps.

“I’m not here to repeal the Second Amendment,” she said in her Democratic National Convention speech. “I’m not here to take away your guns. I just don’t want you to be shot by someone who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place.”

Clinton spent Tuesday in Florida calling for emergency public health action on the Zika virus while visiting the Miami area dealing with the first U.S. outbreak. At a local health clinic, she urged Congress to cut short its summer recess and immediately pass funding for a Zika response. She blamed congressional Republicans for inaction.

“Everybody has a stake in this. And that’s really why I’m here,” Clinton said. “We don’t want to wake up in a year and read more stories about babies like the little girl who just died in Houston.”

It’s an issue that could affect votes in a crucial swing state where she has held a small advantage in recent polls. So far, Trump has not addressed the issue in depth, though he told a Florida television station last week that Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, “really seems to have it under control.”

Story: Josh Lederman and Catherine Lucey

Advertisement

From WTF to LOL, Internet Reacts to Plan to Track Foreigners by Phones

The proto-rage of Peter Finch's Howard Beale in 1976's 'Network.' Photo: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

BANGKOK — Telecommunication regulators signed off yesterday on a plan to track all foreigners in the kingdom using location-tracking SIM cards, and extraordinary ambition that left the internet searing and seething.

Online communities vented a mix of outrage, disbelief and eye-rolling after we reported the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission was serious about a plan mandating all non-Thais use the new, special SIM cards.

George Orwell would have loved this,” read the first comment to our story on the ThaiVisa Forum, a popular place for expats with spleens in need of venting.

The majority of comments felt the stated purpose – fighting transnational crime – was either poorly thought out or disingenuous.

“As stupid as possible. A criminal would just turn off or throw away the sim card. Ever thought about this?” wrote Karl Vandenhole.

Others used social media to suggest it was impractical, easily circumvented by criminals, illogical or reeked of xenophobia.

“So I get my Thai friend to buy the SIM and give it to me?,”  Facebook user Andrew Smith raised the question. “Then I get my own Thai SIM and put it in my cheap second phone and leave it at home 24/7?”

Commenting on an official’s statement about the ease with which Thai nationals could be tracked and arrested, user @viewbkk tweeted “On a side note … OK, [then] go find Red Bull Ferrari boy,” in reference to the years-old cold case of Vorayuth “Boss” Yoovidhya.

Sarcastic, much?

 

Because they ‘sound pretty good?’

They do begin and end with the same letter!

Riiiiiiight.

Security of the nation! (They say)

 

Related stories:

Plan to Track All Foreigners – Not Just Tourists – By SIM Cards Moves Forward

Advertisement

Hot News

LATEST NEWS

Bangkok
overcast clouds
30 ° C
30 °
27.7 °
76 %
2kmh
95 %
Sat
30 °
Sun
36 °
Mon
37 °
Tue
36 °
Wed
36 °