The Consumer Protection Police Division of CIB officers conduct an operation to dismantle a network importing counterfeit goods in Bangkok on May 3, 2025.
BANGKOK — Thai Central Investigation Bureau (CIB) police have intensified their crackdown on illegal Chinese businesses, raiding five warehouses in Bangkok and seizing more than 30,000 counterfeit luxury brand perfume products intended for the Thai market, with a total value exceeding 4 million baht ($131,600).
On May 3, officers from the Consumer Protection Police Division conducted an operation to dismantle a network importing counterfeit goods from abroad. The raids targeted five locations in Ratburana and Bukkhalo areas of Bangkok, where authorities seized 34,806 pieces of counterfeit brand-name perfumes with a total value of 4,361,200 baht.
This operation was an extension of a recent investigation in which authorities searched and seized illegal cosmetic and perfume products from a Thai seller. Further investigation revealed that the products had been purchased from a Chinese investor who had been smuggling goods from China.
Police seize counterfeit luxury brand perfume products intended for the Thai market on May 3, 2025.
The smugglers employed a strategy of renting multiple storage locations to conceal their operations and evade detection by authorities. Investigators conducted surveillance until they identified the product storage sites before gathering evidence and obtaining court orders to search and seize the illegal goods.
Police Major General Pattanasak Buppasuwan, Commander of the Consumer Protection Police Division, stated that further investigation revealed the Chinese investor behind the operation used Cambodian nominee bank accounts to receive payments from illegal sales.
The seized counterfeit perfumes featured packaging that closely mimicked genuine products, though the contents were of poor quality. The operation focused on wholesale distribution to Thai merchants who would then resell the products through various channels, including online platforms and retail shops, affecting consumers on a large scale.
According to investigators, this operation has been running for approximately three years. Authorities are now working to apprehend the Chinese investor on charges of jointly selling unregistered cosmetics, selling cosmetics without Thai-language labels without permission, and selling cosmetics without Thai-language labels.
All seized evidence has been transferred to investigating officers at the Consumer Protection Police Division.
The Consumer Protection Police Division of CIB officers conduct an operation to dismantle a network importing counterfeit goods in Bangkok on May 3, 2025.
Police Major General Pattanasak warned consumers against purchasing cosmetics or perfumes simply because they appear inexpensive, advising them to buy from reliable sources as counterfeit products can cause physical harm including respiratory irritation, nasal mucosa inflammation, allergic rashes, and in some cases severe allergic reactions that may lead to high blood pressure, dizziness, vomiting, and nausea.
He also issued a warning to those smuggling and selling illegal products to cease such activities immediately, stating that police officers will continue to expand their investigation and enforcement efforts. Anyone found in violation will face full legal consequences.
The public is encouraged to report any suspicious activities to the Consumer Protection Police Division hotline at 1135 or via their Facebook page “Consumer Protection Police Division Consumer Alert.
Pet owners in Bangkok must provide safe, species-appropriate housing with sufficient space, light, food, water, ventilation, and waste disposal.
BANGKOK — Residents in Bangkok will not be forced to give up their animals despite new limits on the number of pets per household due to the upcoming Animal Control Ordinance, effective January 10, 2026, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) has reassured.
Bangkok Deputy Governor Tavida Kamolvej announced preparations for enforcement of the new BMA Ordinance on Animal Control (2024) during a press conference at City Hall on May 2, 2025.
The press conference included key stakeholders: Sitthaphon Iamsusut, Director of the Veterinary Public Health Department; Chanya Phasupong from the Animal Welfare Association under Royal Patronage; and Roger Lohanan, Secretary General of the Thai Animal Protection Association.
Published in the Royal Gazette on January 15, 2025, the ordinance will take effect on January 10, 2026, after a 360-day grace period. It designates Bangkok as a regulated area for keeping or releasing mammals, birds, aquatic animals, amphibians, reptiles, and dangerous or poisonous animals.
Bangkok Deputy Governor Tavida Kamolvej announces preparations for enforcement of the new Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Ordinance on Animal Control (2024) at a press conference on May 2, 2025.
Existing Pet Owners Protected
“Many people are worried about the ordinance specifying that households or condominium units can keep 2 or 3 pets, with a maximum of 6 depending on area size. I want to clarify that this law isn’t retroactive—if you’re already keeping pets when it takes effect on January 10, 2026, you won’t be affected. There’s no need to worry or abandon your pets—continue caring for them until they naturally pass away,” Deputy Governor Tavida stated.
She explained the ordinance stems from the Bangkok Governor’s animal welfare policies, specifically:
P137: Lifetime pet registration to prevent abandonment
P138: Systematic management of stray animals to control population growth, prevent rabies, and promote rehoming to reduce new pet acquisitions
Animal Limits Based on Property Size
The regulations establish clear limits for keeping animals on private property in Bangkok:
Large mammals (cows, buffaloes, horses, deer): Maximum 1 animal per 200 square meters
Small mammals (goats, sheep, pigs, ponies): Maximum 3 animals per 200 square meters
Poultry (chickens, ducks, geese): Maximum 1 per 4 square meters
Large birds (e.g., ostriches): Maximum 1 per 50 square meters
Small birds: Maximum 5 per 1 square meter
Different regulations apply to businesses keeping animals in numbers exceeding these limits, with additional public health protections in place.
Public Area Exceptions
Deputy Governor Tavida explained that the ban on keeping or releasing animals in public areas of Bangkok is subject to exceptions. These include:
For the treatment or immunization of animals against disease
For certain activities in designated public areas where the BMA has officially permitted the presence of animals for a certain period
For relocation purposes involving the animal owner
For government-related animal activities and for the release of animals for charitable or traditional ceremonial purposes
Pet Owner Responsibilities
Pet owners must:
Provide safe, species-appropriate housing with sufficient space, light, food, water, ventilation, and waste disposal
Keep facilities clean to avoid foul odors or unsanitary conditions
Vaccinate animals, segregate those suspected of illness, and notify relevant veterinary authorities
Keep animals under control (dangerous species must be kept in cages with clear warnings)
Allow animals to display natural behavior
Prevent animals from injuring or disturbing others
Dispose of dead animals properly to avoid pollution or health risks
Follow instructions from health departments and municipal regulations
Dog Park in Bangkok
Dog and Cat Ownership Limits
The number of dogs and cats allowed depends on property size:
Condominiums/rental units (20-80 square meters): Maximum 1 pet
Condominiums/rental units (over 80 square meters): Maximum 2 pets
Land up to 20 square wah (approximately 80 square meters): Maximum 2 pets
Land between 20-50 square wah: Maximum 3 pets
Land between 50-100 square wah: Maximum 4 pets
Land over 100 square wah: Maximum 6 pets
If owners exceed these limits before the ordinance takes effect on January 10, 2026, they must notify their district office by April 9, 2026. Failure to report may result in inspection and enforcement.
In cases where animals exceed the limit for health hazard establishments such as farms, pet shops, pet cafes, pet grooming salons, or pet hotels, owners must comply with the relevant health hazard regulations.
Bangkok Deputy Governor Tavida Kamolvej announces preparations for enforcement of the new Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Ordinance on Animal Control (2024) at a press conference on May 2, 2025.
Mandatory Pet Registration
All dog and cat owners in Bangkok are required to register their animals, obtain a pet passport, and have them microchipped within 120 days of birth or within 30 days of bringing the animal to Bangkok. This process can be completed by either the owner or an authorized representative.
The BMA emphasized that microchip identification is essential as it stores important data, not only for recovering lost pets but also for monitoring vaccinations, particularly rabies vaccinations, which are vital for public safety.
Additionally, pet ID cards will promote animal welfare by enabling access to health screenings, participation in public activities, and free vaccinations, all improving animals’ quality of life.
Registration must be submitted to relevant officials at authorized registration offices such as the Veterinary Department, Health Department, or District Offices.
Required documents include:
Owner’s national ID card
House registration document for the pet’s residence
Relevant supporting documents
Letter of consent from the landlord (if renting)
Rabies vaccination certificate (if available)
Sterilization certificate from a veterinarian (if applicable)
Power of attorney letter (if applicable)
If someone raises 10-20 animals responsibly without disturbing others, they have nothing to fear.
Support from Animal Welfare Groups
Chanya Phasupong explained that the Animal Welfare Association had been proposing pet registration to the BMA since 2022, and the initiative has now been implemented in 2025. However, the association hopes the BMA will also extend the system to animal shelters and breeding farms.
Roger Lohanan pointed out that Bangkok currently has many stray dogs and cats, mainly because people abandon animals without identification. Microchipping could help solve this problem by linking animals to their registered owners.
“A good law doesn’t have to please everyone; that’s impossible. What matters is effective enforcement,” Lohanan added. “This law doesn’t hurt responsible owners. If someone raises 10-20 animals responsibly without disturbing others, they have nothing to fear. But even a single, poorly cared for pet can cause problems.”
Prince Harry waves as he leaves the Royal Courts of Justice in London, Wednesday, April 9, 2025. (AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali)
LONDON (AP) — Prince Harry said that he wants to reconcile with his family after losing a court battle Friday over his publicly funded security that he said led his father, King Charles III, to stop talking to him.
“I would love reconciliation with my family. There’s no point in continuing to fight anymore,” Harry told the BBC. “I don’t know how much longer my father has.”
But Harry took aim at Buckingham Palace officials after the court of appeal rejected a bid to restore his police protection detail that was stripped by a government committee when he stepped away from his royal duties and moved to the U.S.
The Duke of Sussex said that he was devastated to lose the case that was a source of friction with his 76-year-old father, who is being treated for an undisclosed cancer. Harry has met with him once briefly since his diagnosis early last year.
“He won’t speak to me because of this security stuff,” Harry said in the interview that aired three hours after the ruling.
Harry, who is estranged from his family since departing the U.K. and writing a tell-all memoir with embarrassing details about the House of Windsor, said Friday’s court verdict meant it would be impossible to safely bring his family back to the U.K.
FILE – Britain’s Prince Harry leaves after attending an Invictus Games Foundation 10th Anniversary Service of Thanksgiving at St Paul’s Cathedral in London, on May 8, 2024. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, File)
Harry blames Buckingham Palace officials
Despite those comments, there was little indication of reconciliation in the near future as the palace signaled its support for the court’s ruling.
Harry said repeatedly that the decision to withdraw his security had been made at the direction of palace officials in an effort to control him and his wife, even though it put their safety at risk.
“What I’m struggling to forgive, and what I will probably always struggle to forgive, is the decision that was made in 2020 that affects my every single day, and that is knowingly putting me and my family in harm’s way,” Harry said.
A government committee decided in 2020 that Harry’s security arrangements should be decided on a case-by-case basis whenever he visits the U.K.
Harry said that committee includes two representatives of Buckingham Palace who have blocked his security in the U.K. The king could resolve the security issue by stepping out of the way and letting experts make the decision, Harry added.
The prince called on U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to order a review of the process.
“Whether you’re the government, whether you’re the royal household, whether you’re my dad, my family, despite all of our differences, do you not want to just ensure our safety?”
In response to the court ruling, Buckingham Palace issued a statement saying that issue had been meticulously examined by the courts “with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.”
FILE – From left, Prince William, the Duke of Gloucester, King Charles III, Prince Harry, Princess Anne and Timothy Laurence follow the coffin of Queen Elizabeth II from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Hall, London on Sept. 14, 2022. (Jeff Mitchell/Pool via AP, File)
Loss of security an ‘unintended consequence’ of move
Harry said that he loves his country and would love to show his young children his homeland, but now he only returns for funerals and court cases.
He made a rare appearance for the two-day Court of Appeal hearing last month, where his lawyer argued that his life was in danger and the Royal and VIP Executive Committee had singled him out for inferior treatment.
Three judges on the appellate court ruled unanimously Friday that the committee’s decision to strip him of his publicly funded security wasn’t unreasonable.
Justice Geoffrey Vos acknowledged in a 21-page judgment that the Duke of Sussex felt badly treated and his lawyer had made powerful and moving arguments on his behalf. But he said that Harry’s grievance wasn’t legal grounds to challenge the decision to deny him regular security.
“From the Duke of Sussex’s point of view, something may indeed have gone wrong, in that an unintended consequence of his decision to step back from royal duties and spend the majority of his time abroad has been that he has been provided with a more bespoke, and generally lesser, level of protection than when he was in the U.K.,” Vos said. “But that does not, of itself, give rise to a legal complaint.”
The ruling is likely to leave the Duke of Sussex with a large bill to pay the U.K. government’s legal fees — in addition to his own lawyers’ costs.
The judgment upheld a High Court judge’s decision last year that found that a “bespoke” plan for the Duke of Sussex’s security wasn’t unlawful, irrational or unjustified.
A lawyer for the government said that Harry’s argument repeated his misconceived approach that failed in the lower court.
“It involves a continued failure to see the wood for the trees, advancing propositions available only by reading small parts of the evidence, and now the judgment, out of context and ignoring the totality of the picture,” attorney James Eadie said.
This image provided by Harpo Productions shows Prince Harry, left, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, speaking about expecting their second child during an interview with Oprah Winfrey. “Oprah with Meghan and Harry: A CBS Primetime Special” airs March 7 as a two-hour exclusive primetime special on the CBS Television Network. (Joe Pugliese/Harpo Productions via AP)
Harry says family is endangered
Harry and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, had stepped back from their official roles in the family in 2020, because they didn’t feel they were “being protected by the institution,” his lawyer said.
After doing so, a Home Office committee ruled that there was “no basis for publicly funded security support for the duke and duchess within Great Britain.”
Harry claimed that he and his family are endangered when visiting his homeland because of hostility aimed at him and Meghan on social media and through relentless hounding by news media.
Since he lost his government-sponsored protection, Harry faced at least two serious security threats, his lawyer said in court papers. Al-Qaida had published a document that said Harry’s assassination would please Muslims. And nearly two years ago, he and his wife were involved in a dangerous pursuit by paparazzi in New York.
Harry, 40, the younger son of Charles and the late Princess Diana, has bucked royal family convention by taking the government and tabloid press to court, where he has a mixed record.
He lost a related court case in which he sought permission to privately pay for a police detail when in the U.K. A judge denied that offer after a government lawyer argued officers shouldn’t be used as “private bodyguards for the wealthy.”
But he won a significant victory at trial in 2023 against the publisher of the Daily Mirror when a judge found that phone hacking at the tabloid was “widespread and habitual.” He claimed a “monumental” victory in January when Rupert Murdoch’s U.K. tabloids made an unprecedented apology for intruding in his life for years, and agreed to pay substantial damages to settle his privacy invasion lawsuit.
He has a similar case pending against the publisher of the Daily Mail.
CCTV footage from one of Kaithong's branch at Central Embassy reveals a foreign male customer using his mobile phone to photograph the restaurant's menu, while a female customer takes the restaurant's menu book into her bag, on April 29, 2025.
BANGKOK — A famous Thai restaurant ‘Kaithong Original‘ posted a message on its Facebook page in both Thai and English on May 2 stating that it has filed a police report to prosecute two foreigners who exhibited behavior of stealing the restaurant’s menu.
Kaithong Original stated that on April 29, the restaurant’s headquarters received a report from one of their branches. According to the report, around the afternoon of that day, two foreign customers (a man and a woman) came to have lunch.
“During their time at the restaurant, the male customer used his mobile phone to take detailed photographs of every page of both the food and dessert menus.”
Following this, the female customer placed both menus, which are large-format copies designated strictly for in-house use, into her personal bag and carried them out of the restaurant. The male customer remained at the table during the entire incident and appeared fully aware of her actions.”
CCTV footage from Kaithong’s branch at Central Embassy reveals a foreign male customer using his mobile phone to photograph the restaurant’s menu, on April 29, 2025.
After receiving the report, Kaithong Original’s head office conducted further investigation and reviewed the CCTV footage. Verification of the name appearing on the payment receipt revealed that the male customer is the owner of several Thai restaurants based in Indonesia, operating under multiple brand names.
“The actions of both individuals demonstrate a clear lack of respect for the property of others and represent a serious breach of professional ethics, particularly between businesses operating within the same industry.”
CCTV footage from Kaithong’s branch at Central Embassy reveals a female customer taking the restaurant’s menu book into her bag, on April 29, 2025.
Kaithong Original added that they have filed an official police report with the local authorities. Both civil and criminal proceedings have been initiated in accordance with Thai law. The restaurant also emphasized to state the following:
The intentional removal of the restaurant’s property without permission constitutes a criminal offense.
We urge the individuals involved to take full responsibility for their actions and return the property immediately.
The restaurant will take all appropriate measures to prevent unauthorized use, imitation, or recurrence of such behavior in the future.
They thank their valued customers for their continued support and reaffirm our commitment to upholding the highest standards of ethics and the integrity behind everything they do.
“We hope this incident serves as a reminder to the wider food and hospitality community that mutual respect is the foundation of professionalism and must never be overlooked.”
Kaithong Original Facebook page
Kaithong Original opened in 1998 as a 6-seater eatery, cooking “on demand.” The original restaurant was called ‘Gum Gai Kaithong,’ where “Gum Gai” is Cantonese language used in Hong Kong meaning “Golden Chicken.”
The first branch was in Muang Thong Thani, with Chinese-style decoration, before changing its name to ‘Kaithong Original’ during the era of Saeng-arun Montreewat, the second-generation heir who renovated the restaurant and modernized the brand. It has expanded to 4 branches: Muang Thong Thani, Central Festival EastVille, Central Phuket Floresta, and Central Embassy.
According to Michelin Guide, the family-run establishment, is renowed for its traditional recipes, serving fresh meat and seafood flavours in simple yet refined and lightly seasoned dishes. Catering to different tastes, the stir-fried liver with garlic is made with either pork or chicken liver.
‘Acme Worawat’ has made history with the recognition of the “Most Influential Person in Blockchain and Crypto 2025” accolade at the globally renowned Middle East Blockchain Awards 2025, staged at the iconic Burj Al Arab in Dubai. The ceremony, which occurred on 29 April 2025, attracted attendance from influential figures across various sectors shaping the future of Web3, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Decentralized Finance (DeFi).
Acme Worawat has become the first and only Thai national to receive this prestigious international accolade, following deliberation by a distinguished panel at MEBA 2025. The selection committee comprised notable figures such as:
Dr. Marwan Al Zarouni, CEO of AI at the Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism, Founder & CEO of the Dubai Blockchain Centre, and recipient of the Special Recognition Award
Gareth Van Zyl – Editor, Gulf Business
Scott Melker – Host of The Wolf of All Streets and #CryptoTownHall
Saqr Ereiqat – Secretary General, Digital Assets Association of Dubai
Megan Plisky, also known as “Crypto Megan”, a leading advocate for the advancement of the cryptocurrency, NFT, and Web3 ecosystems
The inclusion of invited judges from the blockchain, fintech, and AI sectors further emphasised the region’s strategic significance in the progression of emerging technologies.
Acme Worawat stated, “It is a tremendous honour to receive the ‘Most Influential Person in Blockchain and Crypto 2025’ award. This recognition constitutes a collective achievement by all $ACT(ACET) holders. ACT started with zero initial supply and was propelled by individuals who invested their own assets to create and sustain its value. ACT exists because of the people and will remain the people’s asset forever—ACT is The People.”
Acme Worawat, also known as Worawat Narknawdee, is a self-made Thai entrepreneur and investor widely recognised as one of the pioneers of the blockchain and cryptocurrency sector in Asia. His engagement with the industry commenced in 2012 through Bitcoin mining, culminating in his current ownership of over 11,000 BTC. He founded ACT(ACET), a globally recognised blockchain-powered digital asset that has attracted more than 159,368 holders and recorded a trading volume exceeding $470 million or approximately THB 15.98 billion. His investment activities in the United Arab Emirates exceed $300 million, encompassing the fintech, luxurious real estate, and premium hospitality sectors. In addition, he established Traderist, an organisation committed to financial literacy advancement and personal life skill development. For over 13 years, he has contributed to empowering individuals worldwide at no cost, promoting success, and encouraging the capacity to support others.
The Middle East Blockchain Awards—an event which marks the convergence of investors, developers, and thought leaders in the future of technology—continues to reinforce the United Arab Emirates’ status as “a global centre for digital asset innovation.”
Sasin School of Management, together with main sponsor SCG Chemicals (SCGC), a leading innovator in the polymer business and integrated solutions for sustainability, proudly launches the Bangkok Business Challenge (BBC) 2025 powered by SCGC.
BANGKOK — The Bangkok Business Challenge (BBC) 2025, powered by SCG Chemicals (SCGC), is set to showcase innovative student startups at Sasin School of Management from May 22-24 in Bangkok.
Now in its 23rd year, the competition stands as Asia’s longest-running global student startup event, providing university students a platform to present sustainable, innovation-driven business solutions.
This year’s competition theme, “Growing Impactful Ventures,” encourages students from around the world to develop bold ideas addressing economic, social, and environmental challenges while creating opportunities for networking and international collaboration.
According to Dibyendu Bose, Deputy Director of Strategy, Innovation & Impact at Sasin School of Management, “At Sasin, we are committed to developing future leaders who can create real-world, sustainable impact.” Bose noted that nearly half of participating teams are focusing on emerging sectors such as MedTech, HealthTech, Agri Tech, and AI, demonstrating the shifting priorities in today’s entrepreneurial landscape.
Dr. Suracha Udomsak, SCGC’s Chief Operations and Innovation Officer, and Dibyendu Bose, Deputy Director of Strategy, Innovation & Impact at Sasin School of Management
Dr. Suracha Udomsak, Chief Operations and Innovation Officer at SCGC, emphasized the company’s commitment to polymer innovation and sustainable solutions.
“Our collaboration with Sasin to co-host the Bangkok Business Challenge 2025 powered by SCGC is a model for innovation and solution development,” said Udomsak. He highlighted that the competition creates opportunities for diverse ideas to transform into viable businesses, calling startups “a vital force in driving innovation in today’s complex business landscape.”
Interest in the competition has grown significantly, with 308 team applications received this year—an 11% increase from 2024. The applications represent 82 academic institutions, including 32 universities participating for the first time.
A distinguished panel of experienced judges will evaluate the teams, selecting those with the strongest, most impactful business ideas. Top performers will receive prestigious awards including the HM The King’s Award and the HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn’s Sustainability Award, along with cash prizes totaling over $42,000 USD (approximately 1,500,000 THB).
The competition reflects growing global interest in sustainable business practices and demonstrates how academic institutions and corporate partners can collaborate to foster the next generation of impactful entrepreneurs.
20 teams have advanced to the semi-finals.
The 20 teams advancing to the semi-finals are:
1. AGAP.AI, Asian Institute of Management, Philippines
2. AgriConnect, Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines
3. Beyond Connected, Sasin School of Management, Thailand
4. CELLECT Laboratories, University of Waterloo, Canada
5. CERO, School of Integrated Innovation (ScII), Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
6. DeliGence, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
7. Edversity, Pak-Austria Fachhochschule: Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, Pakistan
8. HappEar, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
9. Humimic Biosystems, University of Arkansas, United States of America
10. inspecTD, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
11. Joy to the world, Naresuan University, Thailand
12. Krufarm, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand
13. Krumap, Sasin School of Management, Thailand
14. LOCOL, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
15. MabLab, Harvard University, United States of America
16. NeuroFore, Washington University in St. Louis, United States of America
17. PinaClean, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China
18. PowerBite, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh
19. Protenere, Thammasat University, Thailand
20. PulseArk Technologies, University of Arkansas, United States of America
Front page of "Prachachat" Thai newspaper, May 1, 1975, reporting the Viet Cong's capture of Saigon.
BANGKOK — The fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, marked the end of a 35-year war period that began with resistance against French colonization, continued through the Japanese occupation, and concluded with the expulsion of American forces. On that day, Viet Cong troops successfully captured the capital of South Vietnam.
Thailand’s leading newspaper “Prachachat” reported this world-changing event with the headline “Viet Cong Captures Saigon, Rules South Vietnam” in its May 1, 1975 edition. The newspaper detailed how Dương Văn Minh announced surrender to the Viet Cong via Saigon radio at 10:40 AM.
“After the surrender announcement, three white flags were raised over the Central Police Department in Saigon, with another fluttering in the northern suburbs, just four hours after the last American soldier jumped onto a helicopter to escape the city,” the newspaper reported.
Victorious North Vietnamese troops aboard a tank take a position outside Independence Palace in Saigon, April 30, 1975
The report also noted that the United States had been involved in the Vietnam War for 30 years, resulting in 56,000 American deaths, 150,000 injuries, and affecting the lives of more than ten million Vietnamese people.
The end of the “Republic of South Vietnam” came as a result of the “Nixon Doctrine,” implemented by President Richard Nixon, who sought to withdraw the United States from the Vietnam War. This naturally meant that the US no longer needed to maintain military forces and bases in Thailand for operations in Indochina.
Thailand Congratulates the Fall of Saigon
Thailand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement saying, “The long-suffering of Vietnam has ended, and the dream of all Vietnamese people to reunify their country has now become a reality. We extend our best wishes and hope for their success, and we hope that with peace in Indochina, Southeast Asia will be able to develop its resources for the benefit of everyone.”
The rapid advance of the Viet Cong, who took just 2 months to control all of South Vietnam’s territory (Image from the book “How We Won the War” by General Vo Nguyen Giap and General Van Tien Dung, published by Thailand’s Army Operations Department).
Major General Chatichai Choonhavan, then Thailand’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, commented on the fall of Saigon, suggesting that the situation might improve because the fighting would finally stop, leaving governance to the people. Meanwhile, M.R. Seni Pramoj, leader of the Democrat Party and the opposition in parliament, stated, “Thailand can no longer dream that after Saigon falls, Bangkok won’t fall. It will come to us someday.”
M.R. Seni further emphasized that “Thailand must not remain passive about the situation. We should begin relations with China, as well as Cambodia and Vietnam. We need to revise our foreign policy. If American troops withdraw, it would be beneficial. Over the past 40 years, Thailand’s foreign policy implementation has been terrible.”
Difficult Negotiations for US Military Withdrawal
Mr. Anand Panyarachun, former Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, later reflected in an interview 40 years after the event that establishing diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China in 1975 (July 1) faced relatively little pressure compared to the negotiations for US military withdrawal, which encountered significant resistance.
Front page of “Prachachat” Thai newspaper, May 1, 1975, reporting the Viet Cong’s capture of Saigon.
The M.R. Kukrit government wanted the United States to recognize that Thailand’s foreign policy decision-making process had changed since the pre-October 14 era, and that this government had decided to withdraw American troops.
In his foreign policy statement to parliament on March 19, 1975, M.R. Kukrit Pramoj clearly stated, “To create balance in relationships with superpowers, this government will ensure the withdrawal of foreign troops from Thailand within one year.” At that time, the United States still had 25,000 troops and 350 aircraft stationed in Thailand.
Seven Principles of New ground rules
A report on “Thailand’s Foreign Policy Adjustment (1973 to 1976)” states that Anand Panyarachun, who headed the negotiations for US troop withdrawal, spoke about “New ground rules” for a new framework of relations based on seven principles:
Placing US assets and personnel under Thai legal jurisdiction
Prohibiting use of US resources to threaten any nation’s sovereignty
Requiring activity reports to the Thai government
Replacing American personnel with Thai staff for training purposes
Limiting US personnel numbers to Thai-approved levels
Providing US technical officers with the same privileges as those from other countries
Capping cooperation agreements at two years, with options for renewal or early termination
Helicopters carrying Vietnamese refugees landing on the USS Midway, an American aircraft carrier. This was part of Operation Frequent Wind to evacuate American civilians and some Vietnamese from Saigon between April 29-30, 1975, with more than 7,000 people evacuated by helicopter.
Conflicts Between Military and Civilian Officials
The Matichon Information Center reported that the Ramasoon Camp issue not only deteriorated Thai-US relations but also created conflicts within the Thai bureaucracy—between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense, or in other words, between military and civilian officials. Similarly, conflicting mass movements emerged: one led by the Student Center of Thailand demanding US base withdrawals, and another right-wing group opposing communist threats.
Thai military leaders were extremely concerned about the US withdrawal from Thailand, with rumors of a potential coup during M.R. Kukrit’s government. Signs included General Boonjai Bamrungpong, Commander-in-Chief of the Royal Thai Army, ordering military readiness in 1976, and warnings that a coup might occur before the general election on April 4, 1976.
Takhli Air Base in Nakhon Sawan, one of seven US Air Force bases in Thailand. This photo was taken in 1965.Ramasoon Camp in Udon Thani, operated by the US Army Security Agency (ASA). This photo was taken in 1973.
Nevertheless, M.R. Kukrit’s foreign policy led to the closure of US bases in the Northeast on January 31, 1976, and the withdrawal of US troops from Thailand.
Ultimately, the April 4 election results showed M.R. Kukrit receiving only 23,634 votes, losing to Samak Sundaravej who received 33,335 votes in Dusit district, where most eligible voters were military personnel.
Establish Relations with Vietnam
The subsequent government led by M.R. Seni Pramoj as Prime Minister, with Pichai Rattakul as Minister of Foreign Affairs, attempted to establish relations with the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. Pichai and Anand Panyarachun traveled to negotiate with the Vietnamese government in Hanoi in August 1976, reaching an agreement for a joint statement to establish diplomatic relations, pending cabinet approval.
Pichai had to send three telegrams to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to request cabinet approval, with Minister Lek Nana waiting for negotiation results. This revealed an obstacle in policy implementation, as noted in the report on Thailand’s foreign policy adjustment.
“It turned out that the right-wing coalition government partners disagreed, fearing various consequences. I sent a third telegram to Khun Lek, telling him to inform Professor Seni that this was government policy already announced to parliament. We had now succeeded and merely needed cabinet approval. As leader of the Democrat Party and head of government, he couldn’t just sit idly—he needed to make a decision.”
Eventually, the cabinet approved the Foreign Minister’s signing, establishing diplomatic relations with Vietnam that continue to this day.
Thailand’s Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has a pull-aside meeting with Vietnam’s Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh during the 44th and 45th ASEAN summits, on October 9, 2024.
The world-renowned pianist Lang Lang will make his highly anticipated debut performance in Bangkok on May 31, 2025, at Thailand Cultural Centre starting at 7:30 pm, with a piano recital.
This exclusive concert is presented by the Royal Bangkok Symphony Orchestra Foundation, supported by B.Grimm. Lang Lang’s first-ever performance in Thailand offers audiences a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to experience the virtuosity of one of the greatest pianists of our time.
Lang Lang, the world-renowned superstar pianist, educator, and philanthropist, is celebrated as one of the most influential figures in the arts today. Known for his versatility, he has performed for billions at the Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony.
He is a passionate advocate for music education, having founded the Lang Lang International Music Foundation in 2008 to support young musicians and promote music education.
In 2013, he was named a UN Messenger of Peace, focusing on global education. Lang Lang’s efforts to make classical music more accessible have earned him numerous honours, including the Crystal Award at Davos, the German Federal Merit Award, and the French Order of Arts and Letters Medal. He holds honorary doctorates and has performed for international leaders, including four U.S. presidents and Pope Francis.
The program promises to be an unforgettable celebration of passion through the powerful language of music. Lang Lang will perform an exquisite selection of works by iconic composers, curated to evoke the spirit of romance, from Fauré’s lyrical Pavane, the intense expressiveness of Schumann’s Kreisleriana, and Chopin’s passionate Mazurkas and dramatic Polonaise.
Each piece will allow Lang Lang to showcase his dazzling technique, versatility, and ability to connect deeply with his audiences. This concert is an extraordinary treat for classical music lovers and a perfect way to celebrate the season of love.
This recital promises to deliver artistry and a heartfelt experience that will leave a lasting impression. Don’t miss the chance to witness the magic of Lang Lang.
Tickets are available at Thaiticketmajor. The top price ticket includes the following benefits:
SAO Auditor General Monthian Charoenphol explained that expensive chairs are limited to those for the chairperson and committee members in meeting rooms.
BANGKOK — The State Audit Office (SAO) Auditor General has responded to allegations regarding expensive furniture and amenities in the office’s new headquarters, which collapsed during construction due to an earthquake in Myanmar.
During a hearing before the House of Representatives’ Anti-Corruption Committee on April 30, SAO Auditor General Monthian Charoenphol clarified that the furniture mentioned in social media controversies had not actually been purchased.
He explained that the design specifications merely indicated what equipment would be used on each floor and potential vendors, but actual procurement could only occur after construction was completed.
Monthian further stated that once construction is finished, they would need to determine if the furniture meets government standards. He noted that for government agencies, design modifications that add features increase costs, while reducing features decreases costs. Currently, the SAO’s design has resulted in cost reductions.
SAO Auditor General Monthian Charoenphol
When questioned about reports of shower heads costing over 10,000 baht ($300) and meeting room chairs at 90,000 baht ($2,700) each, Monthian responded that the SAO has 2,400 staff members, with over 80% using standard chairs costing 10,000-20,000 baht ($300-600) each.
He explained that expensive chairs are limited to those for the chairperson and committee members in meeting rooms, details of which can be verified through the Comptroller General’s Department. Regarding the shower heads, he stated there were two designs that, when combined, resulted in the higher price.
“The chair issue corresponds to position status. When comparing executive positions in the office, they are equivalent to ministerial level, which is in accordance with the law. You can verify what position the chairperson is equivalent to,” Monthian stated.
SAO Auditor General Monthian Charoenphol clarified that the furniture mentioned in social media controversies had not actually been purchased.
He also denied reports of a movie theater in the building, clarifying that all rooms are meeting rooms, simply designated as different types such as “classroom” or “theater” style. The SAO does not have a movie viewing room.
The Auditor General expressed appreciation for the opportunity to provide clarification and welcomed investigations by all relevant agencies, including government committees, the Department of Special Investigation, police investigators, and other agencies.
“The SAO is an audit organization. We don’t rely on feelings or news reports to audit us. We must adhere to laws and regulations. Everything is scientific and document-based. We are willing to cooperate with audit committees and parliamentary committees with all existing documents and regulations. We are ready to cooperate, but everything must stand on the foundation of correctness,” he concluded.
FILE - U.S. political science lecturer Paul Chambers,left, of Thailand's Naresuan University, stands outside the police station in Phitsanulok, Thailand, where he was arrested on Tuesday, April 8, 2025, on charges of insulting the monarchy. (AP Photo, file)
BANGKOK (AP) — State prosecutors in Thailand announced Thursday that they don’t intend to press charges against an American academic arrested for royal defamation, an offense punishable by up to 15 years in prison.
The arrest last month of Paul Chambers, a political science lecturer at Naresuan University in the northern province of Phitsanulok, had drawn concern from the academic community, especially from Asian studies scholars around the world, as well as the U.S. government
The decision not to prosecute the 58-year-old Oklahoma native doesn’t immediately clear him of the charge of insulting the monarchy— also known as “lèse majesté” — or a related charge of violating the Computer Crime Act, which covers online activities.
The announcement said that the Phitsanulok provincial prosecutor will request the provincial court to drop the charges and forward the case file and nonprosecution order to the commissioner of Provincial Police Region 6, covering Phitsanulok, who may review and contest the decision.
Chambers, a 58-year-old Oklahoma native with a doctorate in political science from Northern Illinois University, was arrested in early April on a complaint made by the northern regional office of the army’s Internal Security Operations Command.
He has studied the power and influence of the Thai military, which plays a major role in politics. It has staged 13 coups since Thailand became a constitutional monarchy in 1932, most recently 11 years ago.
The army’s Internal Security Operations Command told a parliamentary inquiry that it filed the complaint based on a Facebook post that translated words from a website operated by ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, a think tank in Singapore, about a webinar on Thai politics that included Chambers as a participant.
Chambers’ supporters said that the blurb for the webinar, which was cited in his charge sheet as evidence, wasn’t written by him.
He had been jailed in April for two nights after reporting himself to the Phitsanulok police, and then granted release on bail, with several conditions, including wearing an ankle monitor. A court on Tuesday allowed him to take off the device.
Chambers’ visa was revoked at the time of his arrest on the basis of an immigration law barring entry to foreigners who are deemed likely to engage in activities contrary to public order or good morals, prostitution, people smuggling and drug trafficking. It wasn’t immediately clear whether the revocation will stand.
“This case reinforces our longstanding concerns about the use of lèse majesté laws in Thailand,” a U.S. State Department statement said after Chambers’ arrest. ”We continue to urge Thai authorities to respect freedom of expression and to ensure that laws are not used to stifle permitted expression.”
Thailand’s lèse majesté law calls for three to 15 years imprisonment for anyone who defames, insults or threatens the king, the queen, the heir apparent or the regent. Critics say it’s among the harshest such laws anywhere and also has been used to punish critics of the government and the military.
The monarchy has long been considered a pillar of Thai society and criticizing it used to be strictly taboo. Conservative Thais, especially in the military and courts, still consider it untouchable.
However, public debate on the topic has grown louder in the past decade, particularly among young people, and student-led pro-democracy protests starting in 2020 began openly criticizing the institution.
That led to vigorous prosecutions under the previously little-used law. The legal aid group Thai Lawyers for Human Rights has said that since early 2020, more than 270 people — many of them student activists — have been charged with violating the law.
