30 C
Bangkok
Monday, June 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 2094

Media Guild Accused of Dismissing Sexual Harassment Claim

Isra News director Prasong Lertrattanasut speaks on Aug. 24 at a forum in Bangkok about media's role in fighting corruption. Image: ideakeeperhouse / YouTube

BANGKOK — The Thai Journalists Association, or TJA, on Wednesday denied allegations that it plans to dismiss sexual harassment complaints against a prominent media figure.

Women’s rights activist Thicha Na Nakorn was quoted Tuesday in several reports saying she learned the guild has completed its investigation and would exonerate Isra News director Prasong Lertrattanasut of the accusations.

Thicha said the committee has already reached its conclusion – to write off the alleged harassments as mere maa york gai, a term for “flirting around.” Thicha, who’s campaigned for women’s welfare and headed several rights groups, said the conclusion amounts to burying the victim’s grievances.

Reached for comment, Thicha declined to answer questions about her statements, saying she was unavailable.

Mongkol Bangprapha, a TJA official in charge of the investigation, declined to comment on Thicha’s claims. While he acknowledged a working group already finished the investigation, he said it hadn’t yet sent the findings to the committee.

“They already concluded it, but the committee hasn’t seen it yet,” Mongkol said. “To compare to a newspaper: The news is already printed, but the newspapers haven’t left the printing press yet. So we still haven’t them yet.”

He added, “That is all I can say at this stage.”

A reporter who was summoned to testify to the committee said she had the impression that the investigation was conducted fairly. Hathairat Phaholtap, who publicly urged TJA to launch the inquiry back when the allegations first surfaced, said she believes the outcome won’t reflect what Thicha asserted.

“On that day, I felt they could be fair on this issue, and I still feel the same today,” said Hathairat, a Thai PBS reporter. “I don’t think it will turn out that way.”

The TJA announced in September that it was looking into complaints that a senior reporter had sexually harassed one of his female employees, reportedly leading her to quit the newsroom.

Although the group declined the name the person under investigation – citing legal concerns – Isra News agency identified him as Prasong in a September statement, adding it had full confidence in his innocence.

Prasong declined to be interviewed Wednesday.

The 56-year-old editor is widely known for his investigative reports targeting high-ranking officials.

Advertisement

Judge Blocks Trump Decision to End Young Immigrant Program

Cristina Jiminez, left, and Ady Barkan, in wheelchair, lead a small delegation to the office of California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, urging the Democrats to protect the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in Los Angeles, Wednesday, Jan. 3, 2018. Photo: Reed Saxon / Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge on Tuesday night temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s decision to end a program protecting young immigrants from deportation.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup granted a request by California and other plaintiffs to prevent President Donald Trump from ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program while their lawsuits play out in court.

Read: Meet the Thai Medical Student Suing Donald Trump 

Alsup said lawyers in favor of DACA clearly demonstrated that the young immigrants “were likely to suffer serious, irreparable harm” without court action. The judge also said the lawyers have a strong chance of succeeding at trial.

DACA has protected about 800,000 people who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children or came with families who overstayed visas. The program includes hundreds of thousands of college-age students.

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced in September that the program would be phased out, saying former President Barack Obama had exceeded his authority when he implemented it in 2012.

On Tuesday, the Department of Justice said the judge’s decision doesn’t change the fact that the program was an illegal circumvention of Congress, and it is within the agency’s power to end it.

“The Justice Department will continue to vigorously defend this position, and looks forward to vindicating its position in further litigation,” department spokesman Devin O’Malley said in a statement.

Sessions’ move to phase pout DACA sparked a flurry of lawsuits nationwide.

Alsup considered five separate lawsuits filed in Northern California, including one by the California and three other states, and another by the governing board of the University of California school system.

“DACA covers a class of immigrants whose presence, seemingly all agree, pose the least, if any, threat and allows them to sign up for honest labor on the condition of continued good behavior,” Alsup wrote in his decision. “This has become an important program for DACA recipients and their families, for the employers who hire them, for our tax treasuries, and for our economy.”

That echoed the judge’s comments from a court hearing on Dec. 20, when he grilled an attorney for the Department of Justice over the government’s justification for ending DACA, saying many people had come to rely on it and faced a “real” and “palpable” hardship from its loss.

Alsup also questioned whether the administration had conducted a thorough review before ending the program.

Brad Rosenberg, a Justice Department attorney, said the administration considered the effects of ending DACA and decided to phase it out over time instead of cutting it immediately.

DACA recipients will be allowed to stay in the U.S. for the remainder of their two-year authorizations. Any recipient whose status was due to expire within six months also got a month to apply for another two-year term.

The Justice Department said in court documents that DACA was facing the possibility of an abrupt end by court order, but Alsup was critical of that argument.

People took out loans, enrolled in school and even made decisions about whether to get married and start families on the basis of DACA and now face “horrific” consequences from the loss of the program, said Jeffrey Davidson, an attorney for the University of California governing board.

“The government considered none of this at all when they decided to rescind DACA,” he said at the hearing.

The University of California said in a statement after the decision that “UC’s DACA students represent the very best of our country and are a key part of California and our nation’s future.”

The statement says the UC system will persist in legal challenges to the end of the program and will seek permanent protection for the young immigrants.

DACA recipients are commonly referred to as “dreamers,” based on never-passed proposals in Congress called the DREAM Act that would have provided similar protections for young immigrants.

“Dreamers lives were thrown into chaos when the Trump administration tried to terminate the DACA program without obeying the law,” California Attorney General Becerra said in a statement after Tuesday’s decision. “Tonight’s ruling is a huge step in the right direction.”

Related stories:

Meet the Thai Medical Student Suing Donald Trump 

Advertisement

Reuters Journalists Charged with Violating Myanmar Law

Reuters journalist Thet Oo Maung Maung, known as Wa Lone, is escorted by police upon arrival at court Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2018, outside Yangon, Myanmar. Photo: Thein Zaw / Associated Press
Reuters journalist Thet Oo Maung Maung, known as Wa Lone, is escorted by police upon arrival at court Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2018, outside Yangon, Myanmar. Photo: Thein Zaw / Associated Press

BANGKOK — Prosecutors in Myanmar formally charged two journalists from the Reuters news agency on Wednesday with violating the Official Secrets Act, signaling the case will go forward despite international condemnation.

Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were arrested Dec. 12 after police accused them of violating the colonial-era law by acquiring “important secret papers” from two policemen. The police officers had worked in Rakhine state, where security forces are blamed for rights abuses against Rohingya Muslims that sparked the exodus of some 650,000 people to Bangladesh.

Than Zaw Aung, the lawyer for the journalists, said the prosecutor formally indicted the pair at Wednesday’s hearing. They face up to 14 years in prison if convicted.

Than Zaw Aung said he appealed for the two to be immediately released on bail, but the judge said he would review that request and rule at the next hearing on Jan. 23.

“We are still far from the verdict,” he said.

Rights and media groups have criticized Myanmar’s new civilian government led by Nobel Peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi for continuing to use colonial-era laws to threaten and imprison journalists. Such laws were widely used by the military junta that previously ruled the country to muzzle critics and the media.

Dozens of journalists wearing black waited outside the court Wednesday to protest the arrest of their colleagues, who were led into the court with iron chains on their wrists.

Their detention has caused an international outcry. After they were detained, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the arrests showed how press freedom was deteriorating in Myanmar, while U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called for their immediate release.

“A free press is critical to a free society_the detention of journalists anywhere is unacceptable,” former President Bill Clinton tweeted Monday. “The Reuters journalists being held in Myanmar should be released immediately.”

Amnesty International again called for their immediate release and said the arrests were part of a larger problem in Myanmar.

“These arrests have not happened in a vacuum, but come as authorities are increasingly restricting independent media,” James Gomez, the group’s director for Southeast Asia and the Pacific, said in a statement. “Journalists and media outlets, in particular those who report on ‘sensitive topics,’ are living with the constant fear of harassment, intimidation or arrest. This clampdown on freedom of speech must end.”

Advertisement

King’s New Year Greeting Cards Go On Sale

Children play Kee Maa Kaan Kluay in a detail from one of four New Year’s greeting cards designed by King Rama X.

BANGKOK — Hand-drawn cards illustrated by King Rama X went on sale Wednesday nationwide.

The New Year’s greeting cards released Friday feature illustrations of children playing traditional Thai games and were drawn by King Vajiralongkorn. They have attracted “much interest” from the public, according to state media.

The cards, which sell for 99 baht, were first put on shelves at outlets such as Golden Place supermarkets, 7-Eleven, Bangkok Bank, Siam Commercial Bank, Muang Thai Life Assurance, Thai Insurance and King Power. Proceeds will go toward royal charity projects aimed at helping disaster victims.

The New Year’s cards, of which there are four versions, also feature a signed message from King Rama X.

Read: King Rama X Asks King Bhumibol’s Grace to Protect Thais in 2018

The first card shows children playing Mon Son Pa, a Thai game similar to Duck, Duck, Goose.

“Happy New Year B.E. 2561. The Thai game Mon Son Pa is happy and bright,” reads the message from Rama X. To the right is a drawing of a dog and the word “Jor,” a word for dog used to signify the Year of the Dog.

The other cards shows children playing Rii Rii Khaosan, Kee Maa Kaan Kluay and skipping rope. All four cards have similar New Year’s greeting messages and a dog somewhere in the image.

On Jan. 1, King Vajiralongkorn released a card depicting a family playing in the sun, rain and snow.

Since his ascension to the throne, Rama X has drawn several cards for charity, especially during recent flood disasters.

1 28 8AE39052159A4C87BB579D3D3CFD4CD9 089E7BFFCE464A19B477290C8CB8A5F2 74A5123298654211B9268A12E5E95783

Related stories:

King Rama X Asks King Bhumibol’s Grace to Protect Thais in 2018

Our Person of the Year 2017: King Rama X

Advertisement

Potent Precipitation Punishes Bangkok

BANGKOK — Don’t feel too bad about being late this morning – you weren’t the only one.

A heavy downpour and that began with a thunderstorm in the early hours of Wednesday continued unabated into the late morning over much of the capital, bringing a 3C to 4C dip in temperatures and flash floods which snarled traffic in and around the city.

Many areas along Sukhumvit Road experienced the worst traffic so far this year, with traffic at a standstill.

Soi Ramkamhaeng 1 was flooded up to 15 centimeters across three lanes. Rama IX Road toward Chaturathit Road was flooded in some areas, slowing traffic, according to the Bangkok Metropolitan Flood Control Center.

Khlong Saen Saep Express Boats had to cease operation for canal commuters this morning due to rising water levels. Pedestrians crowded onto footpaths as water levels were high in many roads.

Today’s storm blew in on a high pressure front from over China. No major precipitation is forecast through to next week.

10 กรุง4

10 กรุง3

Advertisement

Cinemas Do Not Have to Play Indian Anthem: Top Court

NEW DELHI — India’s Supreme Court on Tuesday reversed a ruling that ordered the national anthem to be played before movie screenings while audiences stand, a ruling that sparked a spate of arrests and attacks on cinema-goers who refused to rise.

The new decision, Indian news outlets reported, allows theaters to choose whether to play the national anthem.

The 2016 ruling, which the court had said was designed to instill patriotism, set off a wave of attacks in theaters, including one on a disabled man in a wheelchair.

The court had indicated it might reverse its ruling. During a hearing last year, a group of justices noted that “Citizens cannot be forced to carry patriotism on their sleeves and courts cannot inculcate patriotism among people through its order,” the Press Trust of India news agency reported.

The court has also ordered that a government commission be established to recommend further decisions on whether the anthem should be played in theaters.

Advertisement

Strolling Through Kolkata’s Colonial Past

A popular café in Kolkata, India, which draws a steady flow of customers for its famed ''chai,'' or spiced tea, and buttered toast. Kolkata is a paradise for lovers of local street food. Photo: Denis D. Gray / Associated Press

KOLKATA, India — The British left footprints across their far-flung colonial empire from Toronto to Yangon. But nowhere is there as vast and varied a collection of heritage architecture than in Kolkata.

Thousands of buildings – including homes, churches, palaces and even synagogues — survive here from the days of the Raj, when Britain ruled India.

This marvelously exuberant, maddeningly chaotic city began as a small trading post in the 1690s, rose to become the seat of British power and now ranks as India’s third largest city, a megalopolis of some 15 million people.

Unlike countries which opted to eradicate the physical legacies of colonialism, India has accepted them as witnesses to history. The prime eradicator of Kolkata’s past has not been politics but those whom preservationists call “land sharks,” developers against whom they wage a sometimes winning, sometimes losing battle.

To dip into Kolkata’s bygone era, my wife and I stayed at the Oberoi Grand Hotel, took afternoon tea at the still oh-so-English Bengal Club and best of all signed up for a guided walk around Dalhousie Square, the onetime epicenter of the British Raj.

Dating back to the late 1880s, the Grande Dame of Calcutta, as the Oberoi and Kolkata were earlier known, was the social hub of the colonial city. During World War II, it was party time headquarters for American soldiers. Today the hotel is an oasis of tranquility amid the surrounding vibrant street life, offering palm-shaded courtyards, Victorian four-poster beds and service which viceroys would find hard to fault.

The Bengal Club, another enduring social fixture, has been catering to elites since 1827, and the lovely premise strives to keep the modern world at bay. One may forget it is 2018 while sipping tea in a politely hushed room named after the prominent 18th century British painter Joshua Reynolds, one of whose works hangs on its pastel yellow walls. The colonials also tried to shut out a dramatically changing India: Incredibly, the club only opened its doors to Indians in 1959 – 12 years after independence was won.

“‘It was from here that 200 British officers ruled over 200 million Indians,” remarked our guide Ramanuj Ghosh, pointing to what is now the 133-room home of the state governor, where British viceroys resided during most of the decades when Kolkata served as India’s capital. Modeled on a stately home in England, it was encased in 6 acres of lush gardens and built in the Gregorian style.

What soon became obvious on our walk, even to an untrained eye, was the incredible architectural melange. The Victoria Memorial, the city’s most imposing colonial structure, is described as designed in “the Indo-Saracenic revivalist style which uses a mixture of British and Moghul elements with Venetian, Egyptian, Decanni and Islamic architectural influences.” Dedicated to the memory of Queen Victoria, its vast art and artifact collections include her childhood piano and a writing desk.

Our four-hour stroll through several centuries of history took us past the 1868 post office and the Royal Insurance Building, still busy today, where British officials would ride their horses right up to their desks. At the vast Writer’s Building, India’s still notorious bureaucracy administered a population which also included Greeks, the Dutch, Armenians and others.

Kolkata once was also home to some 6,000 Jews, though there are just a handful living here today descended from the Jews who settled here in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The city’s oldest, now restored synagogue Neveh Shalome dates back to 1831.

Most of the buildings we saw are about on a protected heritage list. But many others are decaying or have been razed.

“Indian people want to preserve the past. We don’t easily make way for the new, but powerful market forces are working against this,” says Bonani Kakkar, who heads People United for Better Living in Calcutta, an environmental and preservation group.

Developers, she says, approach owners of dilapidated homes, offer them new condos in exchange and then take them down to build high-rises. The solution, she believes, is to either “make people boast that they live in old buildings” or to bring them to life again by turning them into B&Bs, art galleries and music venues.

Philip Davies, an authority on colonial architecture, notes that there are more heritage buildings in this city than all of the United States, but that Kolkata is a “sleeping giant at the crossroads.”

“It is stumbling toward the future rather than grasping the spectacular opportunities afforded by its heritage,” he said. “Its unparalleled heritage is crumbling from neglect, and falling prey to random, speculative development.” But he hopes a brave new vision will save one of the world’s great historic cities.

Story: Denis D. Gray

Advertisement

South Korea’s Moon Willing to Meet North’s Kim

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un waves at parade participants in 2016 at the Kim Il Sung Square in Pyongyang, North Korea. Photo: Wong Maye-E / Associated Press

SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea’s president says he’s willing to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un under certain conditions, after their countries agreed in high-level talks to cooperate in next month’s Winter Olympics in South Korea.

President Moon Jae-in said Wednesday he’s open to meeting with Kim to resolve the North Korean nuclear standoff. But he says the success of such a summit must be guaranteed before the meeting can be realized.

Moon also says he will call for more talks with North Korea to help defuse the nuclear issue.

On Tuesday, the Koreas held their first high-level talks in two years. North Korea agreed to send a delegation to the Games and both sides agreed to hold talks on reducing tensions along their border.

Advertisement

Malaysia PM Visits Saudi King Despite Controversy over Ties

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak. Photo: DPA

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Malaysia’s Prime Minister Najib Razak met with Saudi King Salman in a visit to the kingdom on Tuesday that highlights their close and at times controversial ties.

Najib, who faces elections later this year, has clung to power despite a corruption scandal that involved nearly USD $700 million. Malaysia’s attorney general cleared Najib of wrongdoing, saying the millions transferred to his personal bank account were a donation from the Saudi royal family and that most of it was returned.

Meanwhile, the state investment fund he established and once ran, 1MDB, is under investigation in the U.S. and several other countries amid allegations of a global money-laundering scheme and embezzlement. The U.S. Justice Department says people close to Najib stole billions of dollars, and the U.S. government is working to seize USD $1.7 billion it says were taken from the fund to buy assets in the U.S.

The state-run Saudi Press Agency said the two leaders discussed areas of cooperation during their meeting, which was attended by Saudi royal court advisers as well as Malaysia’s minister of Islamic affairs.

King Salman’s four-day visit to Malaysia last year was followed by an announcement that the King Salman Center for International Peace would be built on a 40-acre (16-hecatre) plot of land in Malaysia’s administrative capital of Putrajaya. The center aims to draw scholars of Islam to combat extremist views and promote tolerance.

There have been concerns in recent years that under Najib, Saudi Arabia’s ultraconservative interpretation of Islam has gained an expanded foothold in Malaysia. The kingdom has built mosques and schools across the region and offers scholarships to Malaysians and other Southeast Asian Muslims who want to study in Saudi Arabia.

The U.N. Special Rapporteur for cultural rights, Karima Bennoune, said after a fact-finding visit to Malaysia in September there are “warning signs that the country’s culture of tolerance is under threat.” She expressed concern for the banning of specific traditional performing arts in parts of Malaysia, as well as the banning of books, including those about moderate and progressive Islam.

Advertisement

Bannon to Exit Breitbart News Network After Break with Trump

Steve Bannon, speaks last November during an event in Manchester, New Hampshire. Photo: Mary Schwalm / Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon is stepping down as chairman of Breitbart News Network after a public break with President Donald Trump.

Breitbart announced Tuesday that Bannon would step down as executive chairman of the conservative news site, less than a week after Bannon’s explosive criticisms of Trump and his family were published in a new book.

A report on the Breitbart website quotes Bannon saying, “I’m proud of what the Breitbart team has accomplished in so short a period of time in building out a world-class news platform.”

Trump lashed out at Bannon for comments made in Michael Wolff’s “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” which questions the president’s fitness for office. As Trump aides called him disloyal and disgraceful, the president branded his former chief strategist on Twitter as “Sloppy Steve,” an apparent reference to Bannon’s often unkempt appearance, and declared that “he lost his mind” when he was pushed out of the White House last August.

The president was livid about Bannon’s remarks – not just at the insults about his family, but also at his former strategist’s apparent intent to take credit for Trump’s election victory and political movement, according to a White House official and two outside advisers not authorized to speak publicly about internal conversations.

After days of silence amid withering criticism from his former colleagues and his largest benefactor, Bannon tried to make amends. He issued a statement Sunday praising the president’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., whom he was quoted accusing of treasonous behavior in the book. Bannon did not apologize for his criticism of the president’s daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, with whom he had squabbled inside the West Wing.

Bannon’s departure from Breitbart came as a shock to some of his allies. One said Bannon was telling people as recently as Monday that he expected to stay on.

Bannon’s breakup with Breitbart is also costing him his daily show on the conservative talk station on satellite radio network SiriusXM. The company announced it is ending its relationship with Bannon, stating its programing agreement is with Breitbart.

Inside the White House, Bannon was viewed as the keeper of Trump’s nationalistic flame, charting the progress on the president’s promises to his base on dry erase boards in his office. But Bannon was marginalized in the months before his ouster over Trump’s concerns that the top aide was being viewed as an Oval Office puppeteer.

Trump had stayed in touch with the Breitbart head after he left the White House in August, including consulting him on last month’s Alabama Senate race. But since Bannon’s quotes in the Wolff book emerged, the White House began sending Republicans and conservative figures a clear message: Trump or Bannon.

The chief strategist had lost many allies in the West Wing after Chief of Staff John Kelly’s staff shakeup and was blamed for some of the infighting that had paralyzed the White House. Some West Wing aides in recent days had made little effort to hide their happiness that Bannon had suffered such a public rebuke.

The White House did not immediately respond to the news of Bannon’s ouster, but press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders last week called on the conservative site – which has been a steadfast backer of the president – to “look at and consider” parting ways with Bannon.

Despite the setback, Bannon has told confidants that he believes Trump, after a cooling-off period, will again seek his counsel, noting that the president often maintains contact with aides he has fired. But some Trump allies hope the president will permanently cut off his former strategist, and the fate of Bannon’s insurgency against the Republican establishment is now in doubt.

On Monday, deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley said Bannon’s apology did not alter his standing with the president. “I don’t believe there’s any way back for Mr. Bannon at this point,” Gidley said.

Story: Zeke Miller, Johnathan Lemire

Advertisement

Hot News

LATEST NEWS

Bangkok
overcast clouds
30 ° C
30 °
28.8 °
78 %
5kmh
100 %
Sun
31 °
Mon
36 °
Tue
38 °
Wed
35 °
Thu
35 °