29.4 C
Bangkok
Saturday, June 20, 2026
Home Blog Page 3403

Court Inquest Says Soldiers Kill 6 at Wat Pathum

BANGKOK — A court ruled today that the Thai military was responsible for the deaths of six civilians, including a pair of volunteer medics, who were seeking haven inside a temple during the 2010 crackdown on Redshirt protesters in Bangkok.

In a lengthy reading lasting almost an hour, a judge told a packed courtroom today that residues of bullets found inside the victims’ bodies were the same type of ammunition issued to soldiers operating in the area at the time of the shooting.

The ruling by the Southern Bangkok Criminal Court shed light on what is considered the darkest episode in the violence that gripped Bangkok between April-May 2010, when the military cracked down on Redshirt protesters who were demanding then-Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajeeva dissolve parliament and organize a new election.

The incident took place on the final day of the military operation, 19 May 2010, when hundreds of protesters took cover in Wat Pathumwanararm Temple as the military moved to break up the Redshirts’ main encampment nearby in Ratchaprasong Intersection.

Many of those seeking cover inside the temple were women, children, and elderly. Also present was a group of young volunteer medics who had set up a makeshift medical station near the temple’s gate.

According to witnesses, gunfire suddenly erupted inside the temple and lasted for hours. By nightfall, six people were discovered dead, including volunteer medics Kamonkate Akhard, 25, and Akaradech Khankaew, 22.

Of the six victims, five were killed inside the temple compound, while the other victim, Attachai Chumchan, 28, was found near the entrance of the temple.

The court said that video footage, taken by a group of policemen from the Royal Thai Police headquarters opposite the temple, clearly showed soldiers on the nearby Skytrain track shooting into the temple.

In an unprecedented move, judges also disputed soldiers’ explanation that they acted in necessary “self-defense” against armed militants who, according to soldiers, were embedded in the crowd around the temple and shooting at military personnel.

Critics of the Redshirts have frequently blamed the crackdown violence on the so-called Blackshirt militants, citing the firearms found inside the temple several weeks later that military officers said were left behind by the Blackshirts.

Some Democrat Party leaders, such as former Deputy Prime Minister Suthep Thaugsuban, even went as far as suggesting that the Blackshirts killed the six civilians in order to smear the government Abhisit’s government.

According to the findings of the court inquest announced today, there was no evidence that Blackshirt militants were present inside or around the temple during the shooting. The entire area had been secured by the military, the court said, and it was difficult to believe that so many journalists – some of them foreigners – had simply failed to spot the gunmen.

The soldiers’ testimony that they were simply returning fire from Blackshirts in the temple also contradicted the accounts of other soldiers in the area who testified they that did not see any armed militants with the demonstrators, the court said.

The judge also noted that in the video footage of soldiers on the Skytrain track shooting at the temple, the officers did not try to take cover or react to supposed attacks from the Blackshirts.

As for the weapons allegedly found inside the temple and shown to the press later, the court said there was no evidence that the firearms were found inside the temple immediately after the incident.

The court also questioned how alleged Blackshirts would be able to transport a cache of firearms into the temple without being detected by authorities who had heightened security around the protest site for days before the final military assault on 19 May 2010.

The judge added that security forces never sent these weapons to undergo extensive forensic testing, a reluctance he said was “suspicious.”

Additionally, contrary to claims circulated by Redshirt critics, forensic tests revealed that no gunpowder was found on the bodies of the six victims. Therefore, the judge said, it was clear that the victims were not related to the guns allegedly confiscated in the temple.

None of the court inquests into 2010 crackdown violence have found Blackshirts responsible for civilian deaths.

Advertisement

Chonburi Teacher Murdered By Her Ex-Lover

(6 August) A Navy officer
killed his ex-lover and committed suicide soon afterwards, witnesses and police say.

Police
in Chonburi province received the report about the incident a school in Banglamung District. In the
building behind the school, police found found bodies of Ms. Manita Rittlamlert, 30, a part-time
teacher at the school, and Petty Officer Prathan Sawangaron, 37, a navy officer from Sattahip
district.

A pistol was found in Po. Prathan′s hands, believed to be the weapon Po.
Prathan used to kill Ms. Manita before he shot himself to death.

Mr. Prakit Kalpakarnchai,
34, Ms. Manita’s colleague, told the police that at around 18.30 he saw Po. Prathan barging into the
school, furiously looking for Ms. Manita. He later saw Po.Prathan arguing with Ms. Manita. He was
trying to convince her to get back into the relationship with him, Mr. Prakit said.

The
heated argument between the two, which lasted over an hour, was witnessed by many teachers and
students, according to Mr. Prakit.

Mr. Prakit then encouraged Ms. Manita to hide inside his
house, where she would be accompanied by another teacher, but the enraged Po. Prathan suddenly
followed Ms. Manita inside and locked the door.

The last words they heard from Ms. Manita was
when she cried Please…. Please don?t do this, followed by 2 gunshots.

Police said
investigation revealed that Ms. Manita and Po.Prathan broke up a month ago after Ms. Manita found
out that he was having an affair. Po. Prathan then tried to convince Ms. Manita to date him again
for several times, and even caused car accidents twice, until Ms. Manita called the police to handle
his act.

Po. Prathan then reportedly promised he would never cause any trouble again, but he
eventually decided to end the relationship in tragic way.

Advertisement

Man Arrested For Hiding Drugs In 'Sergeant Stand Still'

'Sergeant Stand Still' guarding a road

(5 August) Chonburi police arrested a man who hid narcotics inside a ceramic figure imitating the larger traffic police officer commonly seen on Thailand′s roads.

Known as ′Sergeant Stand Still′ (จ่าเฉย), the models stand guard in corners and intersections to act like a traffic police scarecrow, deterring drivers from committing illegal overtaking or turns, as many drivers often mistake the ′Sergeant′ for actual traffic police officers.

The arrest in Chonburi′s Mueang District demonstrates that the Sergeant can also be used to store narcotics. 

Mr. Namchoke Srihongsa was spotted behaving suspiciously in his neighbourhood by police patrols, and ran inside his house when he realised the police were watching him. The officers ran after him and searched his home, but found nothing suspicious at first. 

However, an officer noticed the small saluting ′Sergeant Stand Still′ ceramic figure and proceeded to inspect it, which revealed a number of illegal substance.

Mr. Namchoke confessed to possessing the narcotics, stating that he had bought the drugs from a woman in Chonburi province to sell it to a third party. He told the police he was very new to the business and failed to control his nerves when he noticed the police on the road.

Advertisement

NBTC Chief Says No Intention To Censor 'Hormones' – Yet

Lt.Gen. Peerapong Manakit

(5 August) It appears
that the popular TV series about teens being teens gets to live for another day, after a top
official said he had no plans to axe the show as many have feared.

The comment came after the
members of Office of National Broadcasting and Telecommunication Commission (NBTC) met with
producers of Hormones at Century Park Hotel. The meeting was arranged by NBTC so that the
producers can discuss the much-debated series.

Hormones featured stories about characters who are students facing various issues in their adolescence. Some scenes hint at (but never
explicitly show) sexual intercourse of the characters – and such frank portrayal of teenage life has 
distinguished the series from the rest of a largely-conservative media landscape in
Thailand.

Each episode was aired on a cable channel and later uploaded onto Youtube website.
The producers had claimed Hormones has been watched by over 1 million people.

Nevertheless,
NBTC says it has received a number of complaints about the sexually suggestive contents of the TV
show, so its members had deemed it necessary that the producers explained their motives about the
series to the Commission.

The meeting was attended by Ms. Somsri Rittipan, General Manager of GMM One
Channel – which airs the show – and Mr.Songyot ‘Yong’ Sukmak-anant, the director and producer of the
series from the company GMM Thai Hub.

Lt.Gen. Peerapong Manakit, director of the NBTC,
told Khaosod that the Commission will always use he right procedures to handle the issue before
resorting to any hard power to decide the fate of the series.

He stressed that the
Commission is still on its early stage to resolve the issue, and there has been no intention to ban
the series so far, contrary to reports that the NBTC will simply axe Hormones, especially after
one of its starlets was photographed taking methamphetamine with her friend.

Lt.Gen.
Peerapong said the series had riggered misunderstanding and discussion in the society, so he will
allow the producers to state their points of views. He said the NBTC will give fairness to every
side, and encouraged the society to discuss the show.

“We are calling the society to
act like a jury”, said Lt.Gen. Peerapong

He also explained that the banning process is not
common to censorship, “the producer needs to evaluate themselves first, and the NBTC will evaluate
the content aired to the public”.

However, he confirmed that the investigation into
whether the Hormones series has violated the section of broadcasting law about public morality is
ongoing. He said it would take around 2 months before the Commission deliver its
judgement.

Previously, Lt.Gen. Peerapong had expressedhis
wish to invoke the law to censor the show in order to preserve public morality.

Advertisement

Inquest Over 2010 Wat Pathum's 6 Deaths Due Tomorrow

(5 August) The court is due to deliver an inquest detailing who was responsible for deaths of 6 civilians, including a volunteer nurse, at Wat Pathumwanararm Temple in the last day of the 2010 Redshirts protests.

As the military moved in to crush the months-long protest in central Bangkok on 19 May 2010, hundreds of protesters fled into the tranquil temple, known locally as Wat Pathum, which sits between Siam Paragon and Central World shopping malls.

The temple was designated as "safe zone" by the authorities at the time. Yet, gunfire erupted near the temple in the evening. 6 people were discovered dead, killed by gunshot wounds.

One of them is Ms. Kamonkate Akhard, a volunteer nurse who was tending at the wounded when the shooting started.

Numerous witnesses said they had seen soldiers firing at the temple from the overlooking Skytrain track. Video footage also showed group of soldiers on the track at the time of the shooting. However, the military has always denied any involvement, blaming the incident on group of shadowy armed militants instead.

Tomorrow (6 August) at 09.00, the Southern Bangkok Criminal Court will read out its inquest concerning the 6 victims at Wat Pathum. The case is closely followed as the shooting of Wat Pathum is often described as one of the most poignant violations of human rights in the violent month of May 2010.

One can only guess what the court will say. Previously, the same court ruled that military-issued ammunition fired from the direction of the military position killed the Italian photographer Fabio Polenghi near Lumpini Park just hours before the tragedy at Wat Pathum.

 

Advertisement

Superstar's Affair With Son Of Wanted Politician Raises Eyebrows

Leaked photo purportedly showing Ms. Janie with Mr. Chonsawat and his father Mr. Wattana Asavahame, who is currently on the run from Thai authorities after he was convicted of corruption.

(5 August) Thailand is inundated with daily share of
gossip news about which superstar is in love with whom. But one particular piece of such
ews
manages to get the attention of the Kingdom′s law enforcement agency – the Office of Attorney
General, no less.

For some time, many netizens had been speculating about the new
relationship of Ms. Janie Tienphosuwan, after the famous actress posted series of photos with an
unidentified man bearing the mysterious
messages
expressing how “happily in love” she is.

The 32-year-old star has been in the spotlight for
the last 10 years, and recently made huge success from her leading role as twins Munin and Muta in
Channel 3 soap opera “Raeng Ngao” (Reflection)

The drama featured the story about a woman,
Muta, who was engaged in a love affair with a married top bureaucrat and later committed suicide
after the bureaucrat′s wife publicly humiliated her and the man refused to take responsibility for
her pregnancy. Later, Munin, Muta′s twin sister, came back from her studies in the United States and
sought to avenge her naive twin.

Ms. Janie was praised for her ability in playing both
characters with their widely different personalities. Unsurprisingly, she commands a large fan base.
And the fans have been speculating who she had been dating recently.

As speculation widens,
rumours surfaced that the man Ms. Janie had been seeing is none other than Mr.Chonsawat Asavahame, a
son of a former top politician Mr.Wattana Asavahem who has been on the run from Thai authorities
after he was convicted of corruption 5 years ago.

In 2008, the court ruled that Mr. Wattana, who
was serving as Minister of Interior Affairs, was guilty of conspiring with 10 other defendants to
illegally buy and sell lands in Samut Prakarn province. The lands, located in Bang Bo District, were
in connection with construction of 23 billion baht wastewater treatment plant near the capital
city.

The court sentenced Mr. Wattana, prominent member of Phuea Phaen Din Party, to 10 years
in prison – but he was already out of the country by that time; he fled to an unknown destination
during his release on bail. The Thai authorities, ostensibly at least, have been trying to locate
him ever since.

The law enforcement agency′s latest lead came in a photo, leaked to
ASTV Manager news site by unknown source couple of weeks ago, which appears to show Ms. Janie, Mr.
Chonsawat, and Mr. Wattana together at an unidentified place.

The photo seems to confirm the
relationship between Ms. Janie and Mr. Chonsawat (who is already married), and sparks much
discussion over the internet about the ability of Thai authorities in their dealing with corrupt
politicians.

Indeed, the story struck many netizens as similar to the case about former Prime
Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, the former leader deposed in a 2006 military coup and had been avoiding
corruption charges convicted by the Thai court.

Many opinions from the internet criticised
the Thai police for not putting enough effort to arrest “powerful people” convicted by the court.
One commentator referred to how top-ranking police officers met with Mr. Thaksin to celebrate his
new position in Hong Kong, where the former leader had residence, without enforcing any legal
prosecution or showing any attempt to arrest the man.

Some netizens – ever renowned for their
investigative skill – suggest that the photo of Ms. Janie and Mr. Wattana was taken at Crown Tower
Hotel’s Presidential Suite in Macao. They raised questions why the police did not show any interest
in pursuing the lead.

At least, couldn?t they summon Janie and Chonsawat to be questioned?
asked one commentator.

Eventually, the authorities responded to the debate. Mr. Amnat
Chotchai, Executive Director Office of International Affairs, which operates under the Office of
Attorney General, encouraged the police to question Ms. Janie in order to glean more information
about Mr. Wattana′s whereabouts.

Once we have definite information about where he might be,
the Office will cooperate with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to contact the country Mr. Wattana
is residing, Mr. Amnat told the reporters earlier this week

Mr. Amnat insisted that the
mission to have Mr. Wattana extradited is still going on, and that if he ever enters the country
that has an extradition treaty with the Kingdom of Thailand, he will certainly be brought back to
Thailand to face his jail sentence.

However, the Executive Director said he had not been
contacted by the police about the Macau photo, and it was not in the power of the Office of
Attorney General to summon anyone for questioning.

It′s the duty of the police to
investigate this matter, Mr. Amnat said.

Advertisement

Minister Insists Koh Samet Seafood Unaffected By Oil Spill

Mr. Chuwit Kamolwisit swimming near Ao Phrao Bay

(5 August) The Thai
authorities are intent on assuring consumers and tourists alike that seafood fished off the coast in
Rayong province, the centre of a recent oil spill crisis, is perfectly safe.

The leakage
from an underwater pipeline operated by PTT Global Chemical in the Gulf of Thailand blackened parts
of the popular resort island of Koh Samet last week. Numerous tourists left the island, while many
others cancelled their visits.

Its effect on the environment and tourism eventually spilled
over into seafood businesses. Reports suggest that fear about contaminated seafood has forced local
fishermen to cut the price of their products by as much as 50%.

In a bid to placate such
concerns,
Mr.
Vichet Kasenthongsri,
Minister of Natural Resources with his associates visited Rayong province where
he was received by
Mr. Vichit Chartpaisit, governor of
Rayong province, and a number of other officials.

At lunch time, the provincial
authority arranged the meal for Mr. Vichet and his companions to be served with seafood,
particularly the sea crab which is the delicacy of the province. The delegates ate the meal in front
of the press, reassuring the reporters that the food was “fresh” and “free from chemical residue”
from the oil spill.

Later in the day, the team travelled to Samet Island. They landed on Sai
Kaew beach, famous for its night clubs and restaurants. The beach had not been affected by the
incident and is still visibly crowded with tourists.

The team then visited Ao Phrao Bay, the
area severely affected by the incident, and talked to residents there. They found out that tourists
were not yet confident of the clean-up procedures that PTT and the authorities had carried out, but many
were relieved to see that the beach is nearly back to its previous condition.

Mr. Vichet,
Natural Resources Minister, said that the clean-up procedures are divided into 3 stages and would
take about a year to fully revive the beaches back to their conditions.

He said the
Ministry and Rayong authority will continue to cooperate with PTT to observe the situation and
handle the oil stain left in the sand by chemical treatment. The process will take a while, Mr.
Vichet said.

The minister expressed his belief that Ao Phrao Bay will regain its fame as a
popular tourism spot within the week. He told our correspondent he had instructed PTT to arrange
activities to promote tourism business at the island to build trust among visitors.

Mr.
Vichit, the Rayong governor, said that at least 6 groups of fishermen in the region had asked for
compensations, and at least 560 more people have filed complaints. He said he had appointed the
Provincial Fishery Authority to manage the compensation and rehabilitation procedures in this
matter.

Meanwhile, a prominent MP went even further in his attempt to reassure the public
about the condition of Koh Samet – by swimming in the sea off Ao Phrao  Bay.

Mr. Chuwit
Kamolwisit of Love Thailand Party posted a photo on his Facebook profile showing him topless and
swimming in the sea. He wrote that he was swimming around 30 metre away from the shore and that
while there are traces of oil spill left in the shore, the seawater felt clean enough.

Advertisement

Trang Woman Shot Dead For 'Trying To Break Up Fights'

(5 August) An 18-year-old
woman was shot dead in Trang province after she reportedly tried to break up a fight between a man
and his wife.

The woman was identified simply as Maam by Mueang district police. Mr.
Wirojna Paduka, a friend of the victim, told police he and Ms. Maam and another mutual friend of
theirs were riding motorcycles around the town on the night of the incident.

Mr. Wirojna said
he had spotted a friend of his, called Nen, fighting with his wife on the roadside, so the group
stopped their motorcycles and tried to break up the fight. However, Mr. Nen reportedly pulled out a
handgun in anger, which sent Mr. Wirojna and his friend fleeing into the near wooded area.

He
said Ms. Maam failed to run fast enough, so Mr. Nen shot her dead before he fled the scene.

The police are still searching for Mr. Nen and his wife.

Advertisement

Fugitive Ex-Monk To Surrender Himself: DSI Chief

Mr. Wirapol Sukpol at the height of his influence

(5 August) The former
monk wanted by Thai police for alleged frauds and sexual assault will meet with the Division of
Special Investigation (DSI) on 8 August according to his lawyer, the DSI chief
said.

The DSI has argued that Mr. Wirapol Sukpol had been involved in possible money laundering
and frauds during his tenet as an influential monk based at his secluded monastery in Si Saket
province, where he was revered as a Luang Pu (elder monk) despite his relatively young age.
He had also been charged for sexually abusive an underage woman.

Mr. Wirapol is
believed to be residing in the United States, after the court issued arrest warrant on him. The DSI
has been cooperating with the US authorities in order to have the former monk
extradited.

Now, it appears that such effort would not be needed, as Mr. Tharit Pengdit, the
chief of DSI, said he had been contacted by the appointed lawyer of Mr. Wirapol who had reportedly
assured him that his client wishes to turn himself in later this week – on 3 conditions.

Mr.
Tharit said Mr. Wirapol had requested that he is to meet with the DSI chief personally, that he
would be released on bail after the surrender, and that the DSI treat his case with
justice.

The DSI chief told our correspondent that the DSI will definitely fulfil Mr.
Wirapol′s, as DSI investigates with fairness, and allow suspects to bail themselves
out.

Mr. Wirapol can surely be released on bail if he could affirm the DSI that he will not
leave the country or attempt to disrupt the investigation in anyway, Mr. Tharit said.

Mr.
Tharit added that he believed Mr. Wirapol is currently hiding in one of Thailand′s neighbouring
countries, and he is considering whether to travel to Suvarnabhumi Airport or through the land
border crossing.

Advertisement

Wife Of Redshirt Jailed For Carrying Radio Pleads For Amnesty

(3 August) Ms. Jintana Eiamlaor, a 53-year-old housewife in Rayong province,
has been closely following the chaotic debate surrounding the Amnesty Bill out of a very personal
reason.

She hopes that her husband, who was arrested and jailed in the closing days of 2010
Redshirt protests in Bangkok for violating security laws by possessing a radio transmitter in his
pocket, would be freed alongside other Redshirts prisoners currently imprisoned if the Amnesty Bill
is passed.

The draft of Amnesty Bill proposed by Mr. Worachai Hema, an MP of the ruling Pheu
Thai Party, is due to be debated in the Parliament on 7 August. It promises immediately release, and
amnesty, for Redshirts protesters jailed for their alleged crimes during the 2010
protests.

Ms. Jintana′s husband, Mr. Prasong
Maneeing, 60, was arrested for violating the emergency decree near the Redshirts protests sites in
central Bangkok on 17 May 2010.

The prosecutor charged him with possession of explosives and
communication device, arguing that he was coordinating unlawful attacks on security forces. Mr.
Prasong′s wife contended that the charge and the evidence of explosives were falsely placed against
him, insisting that he was only carrying a small radio transmitter on that day.

Nevertheless,
the court decided that the prosecutor′s evidences are adequate, sentencing Mr. Prasong to 9 years and 4
months in prison.

Ms. Jintana told our correspondent a story similar to what other families
of jailed Redshirts protesters had experienced:
losing
the breadwinner of the family, and having to travel back and forth between their homes in outlying
provinces and Bangkok to navigate through the legal complication for their imprisoned relatives – a
daunting task for many rural residents.

In Ms. Jintana′s case, she and her daughter had to
skip work frequently in order to attend numerous court hearings in Bangkok. She had attempted to
have Mr. Prasong released on bail as he fought his case, but the court never granted it.

“My
family is becoming poorer” said Ms. Jintana. Her husband worked as a local construction contractor,
earning up to 20,00-30,000 baht per project, according to Ms. Jintana. Now that he is in prison, her
daughter is solely responsible for shouldering the family expenses.

She said she was forced to
give up a house she and her husband had been paying in installments in Bangkok, and she had returned
to Rayong province to take care of her 5-year-old granddaughter. Spending time with her is also
hard, she said, as the little girl kept asking her where grandpa is.

Meanwhile, Mr. Prasong′s condition kept deteriorating in prison,  according to Ms. Jintana, as he is old and
has chronic diseases – like diabetes – which usually require him to see the doctor once a month. She is
worried that her husband does not have adequate medical access in jail.

Ms. Jintana said that her family were really happy when they heard about the
Amnesty Bill, hoping that her husband would finally be released from his ordeal with the passing of
the bill.

She stressed that many Redshirts like her husband were falsely implicated in their
crimes by the authorities at the time, and argued that the bill would rectify these
injustices. 


“I wish the bill will pass” said
Ms. Jintana, “It will bring justice for everyone”.

However, the opposition Democrat Party and
anti-government factions have vowed that  they would never let Mr. Worachai′s Amnesty Bill to pass
through the Parliament, insisting that the Redshirts were errorists who deserved punishment and
that an amnesty would amount to cheating the legal system on behalf of city-burning
thugs.

The anti-government activists are poised to stage their major rally near the
Parliament next week to voice their opposition to the Amnesty Bill. The government has responded by
enacting security laws giving it sweeping power to contain the protests, as fear that the protests
might turn violent grew in Bangkok.

Ms. Jintana insisted that her husband is a good man who
went to the protests in 2010 o exercise his democratic rights. She said he had
committed no crime, and did not deserve the lengthy jail sentence imposed on
him.

“It is not
like he had murdered anyone. He is a good man, he does not deserve this”, Ms. Jintana
said.

Advertisement

Hot News

LATEST NEWS

Bangkok
overcast clouds
29.4 ° C
29.4 °
26.6 °
82 %
1.8kmh
98 %
Sat
29 °
Sun
36 °
Mon
37 °
Tue
36 °
Wed
37 °