Allegation Of Former PM Thaksin Insulting The King 'Not Libellous'

By

-

15 August 2013, 14:11

Mr. Sondhi Limthongkul and Ms. Sarocha Pon-Udomsuk

(15 August) The Appeals
Court found 2 Yellowshirts figures not guilty of defamation after former Prime Minister Thaksin
Shinawatra sued them for accusing him of insulting the monarchy.

Mr. Thaksin′s lawsuit, filed
through his representing lawyer, names Mr. Sondhi Limthongkul, the owner of ASTV Manager news
publication and the most visible face of the Yellowshirts movements, and Ms. Sarocha Pon-Udomsuk, a
newscaster on ASTV channel, as defendants.

The lawsuit referred to an episode of ASTV
broadcasts in which Mr. Sondhi cited Mr. Surakiat Sathienthai, a former Deputy Prime Minister in Mr.
Thaksin’s administration, that Mr. Thaksin used hateful rhetoric against the monarchy after he had
been overthrown by a military coup on 19 September 2006.

Mr. Thaksin said in the lawsuit
that the allegation cause damaged his reputation and
credibility.

The Royal Family is a sensitive issue in Thailand, but political factions often
accuse one another of insulting the monarchy.

Various figures of the Yellowshirts and the
Democrat Party particularly have long history of alleging that Mr. Thaksin and his allies are secret
republicans with a plot to overthrow the monarchy – a charge he has repeatedly denied.

In May
2012, the lower court ruled in Mr. Thaksin′s favour, handing down suspended sentence of 2 years
in prison to both Mr. Sondhi and Ms. Sarocha. The pair was also fined 20,000 baht and forced to
advertise the court ruling in 4 newspapers – including Khaosod – for 3 days.

Mr. Sondhi and
Ms. Sarocha appealed the ruling, and the Appeals Court today explained that the ASTV episode was taped beyond the date cited in Mr. Thaksin′s
lawsuit (24 August 2007), hence the court cannot find Mr. Sondhi guilty for material on the video.
The court also found Ms. Sarocha not guilty.

The court noted that Mr. Thaksin was engaging
with the Redshirts protesters during their protest outside the residence of the Head of Privy
Council, Gen. Prem Tinsulanonda, in April 2009. The protest against Gen. Prem, the court argued,
could amount to display of disrespect against the monarchy, since the position of Privy Councillor
is personally appointed by His Majesty the King.

Therefore, it is not unreasonable that the
defendants would be convinced that Mr. Thaksin harbours a disrespect to the monarchy, according the
Appeals Court ruling.

Mr. Sondhi told our correspondent afterwards that the ruling proves
what he understands about Mr. Thaksin.

On the same day, the Appeals Court also dismissed the
defamation suit filed by Mr. Chamlong Sri-Mueang, another Yellowshirts leader, against Mr. Jatupon
Prompan, which stated that the former Pheu Thai MP had published libellous opinions about him.

The case referred to Mr. Jatupon’s opinion published in Khaosod′s daily newspaper and its
online site on 8 November 2010, in which Mr. Jatupon said that Mr. Chamlong and other Yellowshirts
leaders were resorting to ultra-nationalist rhetoric to creat chaotic situation in Bangkok and pave
way for military intervention.

At the time, Thailand and Cambodia were locked in violent
border dispute over possession of Preah Vihear Temple, while Yellowshirts protesters took to the
street in an attempt to oust the Thaksin-allied government.

The lower court argued that Mr.
Jatupon only criticised Mr. Chamlong and friends to express his personal opinion.

In the
court’s opinion, the phrase, “create chaotic situation … expanding the situation beyond the
government control”, was said on Mr. Jatupon’s opinion that the protest led by Mr. Chamlong was not
appropriate. Meanwhile, the phrase “left a gap for military intervention” was only Mr. Jatupon’s
assumption, the court said.

The Appeals Court today sided with the lower court, dismissing
the lawsuit.

Red Protesters Call For NHRC Chairwoman To Resign

By

Khaosod English

-

14 August 2013, 18:08

(14 August) Redshirts converged at the office of the National Human Rights Committee (NHRC) today to voice their displeasure at the report about the 2010 political unrest released by the agency, which has been criticised for its lack of emphasis on the atrocities committed by the military during the crackdown.

Published online last week, it took only several hours before some academics and Redshirts activists denounced the report, calling it full of bias and double standard.

Much of the criticism is directed at Ms. Amara Pongsapitch, the Chairman of the NHRC, charging that she failed to protect the human rights of the citizens. Her critics noted her reluctance to hold the military accountable for their roles in 2010, either in her reports or her public appearances.

Mr. Wutthipong Kotchathammmakun (aka. Ko Tee), a leader of the National United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) in Pathumthani Province, and Mr. Pongpisit Kongsena, a representative of another Redshirts group, led the protests at the NHRC today to repeat such allegation against Ms. Amara.

Some Redshirts at the protest claimed that the report is an instrument to whitewash then-Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva and his deputy at the time, Mr. Suthep Thuegsuban, from the atrocities that took place after the pair authorised the military crackdown against the Redshirts protest which left nearly 100 people dead, mostly civilians.

Both Mr. Abhisit and Mr. Suthep are facing murder charges for their role in the 2010 crackdown.

Mr. Pongpisit said that the works of the NHRC, particularly their recent report, had misled the people and distorted the truth. He also cited opinions of a number of academics who said that the NHRC avoided mentioning the deaths of Redshirts protesters and often defended the authorities action in its report.

He told our correspondent that the role of the NHRC is to protect people’s human rights to be free from government violation. "However, the NHRC proved they did not stand with the people," Mr. Pongpisit said.

In a sarcastic gesture, the protesters also brought applications for the membership of the Democrat Party for the committee to sign. "We believe that the committee would contribute more to the society if they just worked for the Democrat Party," one protester said.

At 10.50, Mr. Khanchai Kongsanae, the deputy secretary of the NHRC emerged and met with the protesters to receive the complaint letter the Redshirts wrote for the Committee. He told the protesters he would bring up the issue with other members of NHRC.

Leaders of the protests said they will give the committee 15 days to consider their resignation, and if the committee refuses, they would proceed with further action.

However, the organisers of the protests added that they would consider government’s action before they proceed, as the government is currently working to create peace in the society.

After more speeches denouncing the NHRC were made, the protest peacefully dispersed at around 11.00.

Motorcycle Crash Costs Foreign Man His Leg

By

Khaosod English

-

14 August 2013, 17:03

(14 August) A foreigner
in Chonburi Province lost his left leg after his motorcycle crashed into a speedboat parked on the
beach, police said.

Earlier this morning, Police from Banglamoong District, Chonburi
province, was alerted to investigation the scene, where a foreigner was found
unconscious.

According to the police, the man did not carry any official documents with him.
He is said to be a White Caucasian aged between 20-25 years old.

One witness told our
correspondent that he saw the foreigner driving his motorcycle at a high speed. He also suspected
that the foreigner was drunk, as the motorcycle swung before it crashed into a speedboat which was
parked on the beach.

The witness said that the body of the foreign man had been thrown 50
metres away from the crash. The accident also caused the man to lose a part of his left
leg.

Police said they would contact the owner of the speedboat and proceed with the legal
investigation.

Taxi Driver Suffers Shock, Dies At Passenger's House

By

Khaosod English

-

14 August 2013, 16:48

(14 August) A taxi driver died at
his passenger′s house in Bangkok after he suffered a shock.

Mr. Petchara Raengsikor, 44, was
picking up his regular passenger at her residence. The house owner, Mr. Pasawee Tansiriwanchai, said he called Mr. Petchara to
pick up his wife and invited him for a conversation in his living room when he arrived as they
waited for his wife to get ready.

After half an hour of talking, Mr. Pasawee said, the driver
left the house, but suddenly suffered a circulatory shock on his front porch. Mr. Pasawee told
police he contacted the rescue team and tried to save Mr. Petchara′s life, to no avail. The rescue
workers pronounced him dead at the scene when they arrived.

Ms. Kesorn Lanwong, the
driver′s wife, was later informed of Mr. Petchara′s death. She told our correspondent that her
husband did not have any underlying disease, and lived his life normally before his death. Mr.
Pasawee also said Mr. Petchara did not show any sign of illness during their
conversation.

Police said they would proceed with further investigation in order to confirm
the cause of death.

4 Suffocated To Dead In Ubon Mushroom Greenhouse

By

Khaosod English

-

14 August 2013, 15:47

(14 August) 4 people
reportedly died of asphyxia in a sealed mushroom incubator workshop.

Mr. Sathon Lathuli, 42,
the owner of a mushroom farm in Mueang district, Ubon Ratchathani Province, was found dead along
with 3 of his relatives, said Ms. Sa-ngiam Lathuli, Mr. Sathon’s relative and a worker at the
farm.

Along with Mr. Sathon, Ms. Sompong Kasemmanee, 37, Ms. Supawinee Lathuli, 20 and Mr.
Roong-arun Kasemmanee, 14, were also found dead at the scene.

Ms. Sangiam told police that
she went into the incubator after she noticed that Ms. Supawinee did not return home yesterday
evening. She then found the 4 bodies inside the incubator, and called for help from other people to
open the incubator’s roof, but it was too late.

The 4 people were pronounced dead at the
scene, and police said they did not find anything suspicious. However, the police said they would
still conduct tests on the victims? blood examples to find any trace of chemical
substances.

According to our correspondent, this kind of accident rarely happened in
Thailand, but media reports in the past documented how pipe workers suffered oxygen deficiency
inside the tunnel which contains low oxygen level.

'LINE' Controversy Adds To Yingluck Govt's Dubious Rights Records

By

Khaosod English

-

14 August 2013, 13:57

Ms. Yingluck Shinawatra at 65th World News Paper Congress, held in Bangkok, where she insisted that freedom of expression is her government's priority.

(14 August) The
technology crime police′s proposal to snoop chat logs of the popular ?LINE? application has drawn
widespread opposition, including from some close associates of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra.

Pol.Maj.Gen. Pisit Pao-in, commander of Technology Crime Suppression division, claimed
yesterday (13 August) that he has dispatched officials to Japan, where LINE is based, to request chat log
data of individuals suspected of committing crimes.

He said his agency would use a software
to detect suggestive words in the communication networks such as arms trading, drugs selling,
fake goods, or prostitution.

Thailand has over 15 million Line users. Surely I cannot
monitor them all, so we will only focus on those who violate the laws on social network,
Pol.Maj.Gen. Pisit said.

He added that the division would also seek out those who criticise
the monarchy or pose other threats to the national security. Discussion of the Royal Family is
criminalised under lese majeste law in Thailand.

As for other social network outlets,
Pol.Maj.Gen Pisit said he had requested cooperation from administrators of WhatsApp, Youtube, and
Facebook but those requests had been largely ignored. Japan, on the other hand, tends to be more
cooperative, he mused.

The news –
understandably – ignites a fury on the Thai social network. Many view the proposal as an intrusive
measure against individuals? rights to free expression and privacy, while others say they are
reminded of the ongoing controversy about Prism surveillance program conducted by the United States
spy agency.

The chairwoman of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Ms. Amara
Pongsapitch, said the program suggested by Pol.Maj.Gen. Pisit is highly at risk of violating
individuals? privacy. If the authorities should go ahead with the plan, she said, the aim and
process of the program should be strictly defined.

The Democrat Party also spared no time
before lashing out at the proposal – for a somewhat different reason. Ms. Mallika Boonmeetrakoon,
deputy spokeswoman of the Democrats, said instead of intruding citizens? Line communication the
government should in fact focus on shutting down websites and blocking Facebook pages that contain
offensive content about the Royal Family.

It should be noted that the proposal to monitor Line application is
the latest addition to dubious records of free speech under the administration of Ms. Yingluck,
which disappointed many of its supporters who hoped the government would show more tolerance toward
freedom of speech than its predecessors.

Just last week, the police summoned 4 individuals,
one of them a high profile editor at a TV channel, to talk with the officials because they spread
rumours about an imminent military coup, just as anti-government protests were about to take place in
Bangkok.

As for the use of lese majeste law, while
it is true the royalist Democrat Party is more keen on punishing the discussions on monarchy (in
November 2011, for instance, Ms. Mallika demanded that the Yingluck administration completely block
Youtube and Facebook because of offensive contents posted there), the ruling Pheu Thai Party does
not show any sign to reform or repeal it neither.

Mr. Anudit Nakornthub,
Minister of Information and Communications Technology (ICT), went as far as saying that anyone who
even ?liked? or ′shared? offensive materials on the social media could be punished by computer crime
laws – a remark that drew sharp criticism from internet rights advocacy
groups.

Contacted by
Khaosod, Pol.Maj.Gen. Pisit said the concern of civil rights groups has been overblown. He said
that human rights and privacy of ordinary citizens will not be affected by the plan, because only
those suspected of breaking the laws would be targeted.

Ms. Yingluck herself told the reporters at a press conference later in the day that she
has not studied the surveillance program in details, but said there is a need to monitor
communications for threat to national security.

She repeated Pol.Maj.Gen. Pisit′s insistence
that rights and liberty of ordinary citizens would not be in danger

Nonetheless, perhaps
sensing the intense unpopularity of the program, some allies of Ms. Yingluck went on the record to
criticise the plan to monitor LINE chat logs.

Mr. Panthongtae Shinawatra, the son of former
leader Thaksin Shinawatra and a niece of Ms. Yingluck, wrote on his Facebook that chat application
is a tool which could be used for both legal and illegal purposes, so an attempt to enforce the laws
should take care not to affect other citizens who are not part of the wrongful
actions.

Police in this era should be friendly to the people. Please don?t copy the playbook
of the Democrat Party, Mr. Panthongtae said.

Meanwhile, Mr. Siriwat Jupamatta, a
representative of the Redshirts? official organisation in Payao Province, said he disagreed with
Pol.Maj.Gen. Pisit′s plan because it will violate rights to communication and only serve to alienate
the government from its supporters.

Mr. Siriwat warned that if the technology crime
suppression police continue to create an atmosphere of fear for internet users, many would be more
radicalised and vent their political frustration in platforms more dangerous or uncontrollable than
the social network.

Mr. Anudit, the ICT Minister, similarly voiced his opposition to the LINE
monitor program. He said his agency would not assist the Technology Crime Suppression police about
the matter.

LINE representative in Thailand
said in a statement that the company has not received any formal request from the police, and
insisted that the company will not give its data to the Thai authorities as it prizes the privacy
of our users.

Banana Trees Planted As Protests Over Poor Roads

By

Khaosod English

-

13 August 2013, 21:28

(13 August) Many
residents in in Nakorn Ratchasima Province said they had complained repeatedly to the provincial
authority about the condition of local roads which are dotted with holes and puddles. The roads
would be more useful as farmland, the residents complained.

So far, the provincial officials
showed no hurry to fix the matter. A group of protesters, mostly villagers in the area, made their
point today by sarcastically planting banana trees along the stretch of roads near Baan Nong Phuang
village.

Many kids fell on their bicycles around here said a villager hey could not go to
school, because their uniforms were covered in mud.

The protesters also complained
that the Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA) and the Pho Klang Municipality have not been
providing electricity to Baan Nong Phuang village.

One villager told our correspondent that it has
been 10 years since the PEA promised them that they would be able to use electricity. It never
happened. The only thing we can do is to illegal connect the electricity from other village, he
said.

The villagers said they hope that these banana trees planted on the road would finally
attract some attention from related authorities to come and provide better infrastructure in the
village.

Redshirts Leader Acquitted Of Defaming Former PM Abhisit

By

Khaosod English

-

13 August 2013, 20:42

Contrary to Mr. Jatupon Prompan's claim, other Prime Ministers were also seated next to the King, including Ms. Yingluck Shinawatra

(13 August) The Appeals Court ruled today that a prominent leader of the Redshirts was not guilty of defaming former Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva when he accused Mr. Abhisit of displaying insolence in front of His Majesty the King.

In 2009, Mr. Jatupon Prompan, acting as a spokesman of the National United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD), said in a press conference that Mr. Abhisit, who was the Prime Minister at the time, insulted King Bhumibol by sitting on a chair when he appeared before His Majesty the King a few weeks earlier.

Members of the Royal Family are treated with strict reverence in Thai public life. Those who seek audience with the Royal Family generally prostrate or kneel on the ground (foreign leaders are exempted from this practice). Therefore, Mr. Jatupon said, Mr. Abhisit was ′behaving as though he was equal to the king′ (ตีตนเสมอเจ้า).

The accusation turned out to be inaccurate, as there had been instances when top officials, Prime Ministers included, are allowed to be seated with His Majesty the King.

Mr. Abhisit later filed charge against Mr. Jatupon, who also served as MP for Pheu Thai Party, claiming that the Redshirts leader spread false information against him. The lawsuit accused Mr. Jatupon of ′causing misunderstanding and disgracing [Mr. Abhisit′s] reputation′.

The Criminal Court ruled on 20 July 2012 that Mr. Jatupon was guilty as charged, sentencing him to 6 months in prison. Mr. Jutupon was also fined for 50,000 baht and forced to advertise court decision on 2 daily newspapers for 7 days.

However, since Mr. Jatuporn had no history of criminal conviction, the court gave Mr. Jatupon a suspended sentence.

Mr. Jatuporn then appealed against the court decision, which led to the verdict of the Appeals Court today.

The Appeals Court stated that Mr. Jatupon′s claim against Mr. Abhisit was ‘the rhetoric from his own perspective’, which may sound ‘invalid’ and ‘subjective’ to the public. The Court also noted that Mr. Jatupon has never appeared before the Royal Family, so it is forgiveable that he was mistaken about the tradition.

Hence, the Court of Appeal ruled that Mr. Jatupon was not guilty, and announced the previous court decision to be nullified.

The Royal Family is virtually a taboo topic in Thailand, but it does not stop various political factions to play politics by invoking the monarchy in its rhetoric. The surest way to defame opponents in Thailand is to accuse them of being disrespectful to the monarchy.

Although it is mostly the royalist Yellowshirts and Democrat Party that charge the Redshirts of insulting the monarchy, Mr. Jatupon′s case is a proof that some among the Redshirts movements are also capable of adopting the same rhetoric.

'Butt-Shaking Murderer' Claims Dowry Dispute As Motive

By

Khaosod English

-

13 August 2013, 18:00

(13 August) After nearly
a week of intense dead-or-alive manhunt, Thai police finally arrested a man who shot dead his
fiancée and her mother, then shook his bottom merrily as he left the crime scene.

The
suspect, identified by police as Mr. Thanet Haegan, killed the 2 victims in front of his 2 friends
at BS Modify, an automobile workshop located in Mueang District of Chonburi Province on 8
August.

The whole incident was captured on CCTV camera. The footage showed the moments when Mr.
Thanet, sitting on a stool in front of his fiancée and his soon-to-be mother-in-law, suddenly stood
up after a heated argument with them and shot both victims dead.

To many, the most disturbing moment was when Mr. Thanet briefly danced, shaking his bottom, as he calmly left the
workshop – a gesture that made him instantly known as the ?Butt-Shaking Murderer?.

The
police immediately issued a wanted notice on Mr. Thanet, describing him as armed and extremely
dangerous. The notice also authorised the officers to use deadly force against him.

The
victims were identified as Ms. Kewalin Hongthong, 28, and her mother Ms. Wimon Hongthong. Video
footage showed that Ms. Wimon tried to flee the scene but was stopped and shot dead by Mr.
Thanet.

Yesterday (12 August), the police finally got its hand on Mr. Thanet, after Cambodian authorities extradited him to the Thai authorities. Reports indicated that Mr. Thanet
had been hiding in Banteay Maenchey province of Cambodia before he was recognised by the Cambodian
police.

Mr. Thanet confessed that he had committed the crime. As for his motive, he said he
had been pressured by the victims? family who requested a hefty sum of dowry from
him.

According to Mr. Thanet, Ms. Kewalin′s family demanded 2 million baht in cash and a car,
which Ms. Wimon reportedly said she wanted Mr. Thanet to drive Ms. Kewalin to the
university.

Mr. Thanet also denied that he did not mean to insult anyone when the camera
recorded him shaking his butt after he shot both victims.

Media reports have previously said that Mr. Thanet shot his girlfriend and her mother after he accused Ms. Kewalin of talking
to other men on Facebook, and that he committed the murder out of rage and jealousy.

Mr.
Narong Hongthong, Ms. Kewalin′s adoptive father, later objected to Mr. Thanet’s claim, stating that his
family only asked for a 480,000-baht-worth dowry.

He told our correspondent that Mr. Thanet
initially offered 600,000 baht as dowry, but Mr. Narong disagreed because he believed number 6 was
an unlucky number, and later proposed the amount of 480,000 baht. He also insisted that his wife
never asked Mr. Thanet to buy any car.

Meanwhile, Mr. Arom Nantachalakornkit, Ms. Kewalin′s
biological father, said that his daughter had consulted him about Mr. Thanet’s behaviour prior to
the incident, saying he acted violently whenever he was angry.

Mr. Arom said he saw Mr. Thanet
as nice and modest. He said he often went out for clubbing with Mr. Thanet, so he was quite close to
Mr. Thanet. Mr. Thanet had also vowed to take good care of his daughter, according to Mr. Arom.

It is
not clear what Mr. Thanet does for a living. Mr. Arom refused to tell our correspondent what Mr.
Thanet′s occupation is, but police officers said they suspected that Mr. Thanet may be involved in
the drug smuggling circle in Chonburi Province.

Mr. Thanet, according to the police, owns several assets, cars, and large amount of money in his bank accounts even though he is unemployed.
Additionally, Mr. Thanet has bought property under other people’s names, including the house for
his future family worth 5 million baht, police said.

Although the case shocked much of
the Thai public, domestic violence is in fact widely common in Thai society. According to statistic
from Office of Women′s Affairs and Family Development, 461 cases of domestic violence between
married husband and wife alone were reported throughout 2010.

However, experts have
warned that the data might be under-reported as many Thai women believe it is shameful to talk about
such issues to anyone outside the family, so many cases of domestic violence are not recorded by the
authorities.

Even so, one does not need accurate statistics to highlight the prevalent problem
of domestic violence in Thailand. News reports frequently documented cases in which suspects harmed
or even killed their lovers or ex-lovers in emotional disputes.

Just today, a taxi driver
reportedly stabbed his wife to dead in Sam Pran District of Nakhon Pathom Province after he
discovered that she had been chatting with other men on her smartphone.

A witness told our
correspondent that Ms. Wassana Srisalai, a 30 year old factory worker, was arguing heatedly with her
husband Mr. Wijint Thongsuwan, 31, about the matter. Mr. Wijint was trying to grab her phone before
he suddenly stabbed Ms. Wassana with a knife, the witness said.

Mr. Wijint also stabbed
himself in the neck afterwards. He is being treated in hospital.

Police investigation
suggested that Mr. Wijint was jealous of Ms. Wassana′s relationship with other men, and he later
learned about a romantic chat between his wife and a man, whose name believed to be ?Pao?.

Man Seeks Ex-Girlfriend's Forgiveness Via Billboard

By

Khaosod English

-

13 August 2013, 17:10

(13 August) Billboards
advertising various products grace the landscape of Bangkok metropolis, but many commuters would
surely have been struck by one peculiar signboard on the busy Ladprao Road.

The billboard,
which occupies an entire length of a 3-storey block of building on Soi Ladprao 101, bears a message
of a man pleading his ex-girlfriend, identified by the sign as ?Tarn?, to come back to
him.

According to the sign, a man who identified himself as ?Mr. A? is very sorry for having
said that to you. I just said it to test if you still love me.

I am sorry. I still
love you and still wait for you, Tarn, the message continues, Everybody at home is worrying about
you. We are waiting for your return. I wish you could forgive me. I love you so much

In the
last two lines, the man gave the telephone numbers of him and – strangely enough – Ms. Tarn. The
full name of Ms. Tarn was also written on top of the billboard.

Khaosod correspondent
later contacted the woman, who admitted that she had indeed dated the guy, but has not seen the sign
herself.

Ms. Tarn said she was aware of the billboard because she has been contacted a few
times by people who saw her telephone number on it: once from a commuter who called her to say she
wished Ms. Tarn could reconcile with Mr. A, and the other was a man who asked if he could buy the
building where the billboard was posted.

As for Mr. A, Ms. Tarn said that they had separated
several months ago. Now that he is doing this [placing a billboard asking her forgiveness], it got
me wondering: why did he not do better while we were still together? Ms. Tarn said.

She told
our correspondent she was the one who decided to end the relationship, and does not think that she
had been letting everybody worried about her, contrary to what the billboard suggested.

I
work in Bangkok but I have been in contact with my family in Petchabun Province all the time. They
have nothing to worry about, Ms. Tarn said, adding that the billboard′s text is misleading because
it gives perception that she has run away from him.

When our correspondent asked if she is
going to take any legal action against the man, she said I do not wish to cause any trouble, but I
will ask him to remove the sign.

Hot News

LATEST NEWS